preview

Negative Effects Of The Columbian Exchange

Decent Essays

Many times, actions come with unintentional results. They can be both helpful and harmful to the environment. Similarly, Columbus’ voyage to the Americas had unintended results. In 1492, Columbus sailed west in search of a quicker, cheaper way to reach Asia and access the goods there. Instead, he arrived at modern-day Bahamas. He had a total of four voyages, looking for gold. Men accompanying him to the New World also made settlements throughout the Caribbean islands, converting Natives to Christianity. Columbus’ voyages were all funded by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, as he promised to earn Spain glory. Although Columbus may not have intended so, he paved the way for the Columbian Exchange. Many goods were traded and Europeans traveled …show more content…

Bringing over diseases may have been unintentional, but just as drastic. Alfred Crosby, a professor at the University of Texas, first used the term “Columbian Exchange” to describe the world-wide interaction set off by Columbus’ discovery. He explains in his book, The Columbian Exchange, “... they brought with them all their plants, animals, and germs, creating a kind of environment to which they were already adapted… Amerindians had not adapted to European germs, so initially their numbers plunged.” By transferring their goods to the New World, Europeans created a place where they could flourish. Without the Natives in mind, they lived in comfort with plants and animals familiar to them. The germs they brought with them killed off Natives, since their bodies had not adapted. Foreign species can also have a negative impact on the environment, upsetting the food chain by disturbing the balanced ratio of predators and prey. To summarize, the Columbian Exchange was harmful because it brought over diseases that killed Natives, and had a side effect that harmed the …show more content…

Jesus Garcia, a professor at the University of Nevada, supports in his book Creating America: Beginnings Through Reconstruction: A History of the United States that the Columbian Exchange did indeed do good for the Europeans. He confirms that various crops fed Europeans, “two that had a huge impact were potatoes and corn. They helped feed European populations that otherwise might have gone hungry” (Garcia). When populations go hungry, they either die out or move somewhere for work. If it were not for the Columbian Exchange, places like Ireland, which thrived on potatoes, would be scarcely inhabited. The rest of the world would also be affected because less people means less people to work, have kids, and overall improve the economy. Who knows how the world economy would be affected today, just because Europeans went hungry so many years ago. Although the survival of people is undeniably a cause for gratefulness, it does not justify the many lives that were lost among the Native people. While lives were saved, they were lost as well, death and abuse upset the overall scale of judgement in its favor. In summary, the Columbian Exchange still caused more harm than good, even though it eased the hunger of starving

Get Access