Native and Current Americans Perception of Nature Have you ever wondered what America was like before we got here? The Native Americans know, and they wrote many stories describing how they feel about nature. These writings show they worshipped nature greatly and never wanted to disturb it in any way. Then, the Europeans came and disrupted their whole way of life. The invaders, at the time, did not have much respect for the land around them, and the Native Americans did not like that. They thought they might be friendly but ended up not respecting them. They told the Americans through writings like How can you buy or sell the sky?. Some others writings they used to show the Americans their appreciation towards nature were Walum Olum, Song of …show more content…
First of all, their overall views of nature have many differences and similarities. The one major difference is how Native Americans cherish nature and Americans want to control it. The Native Americans only use what they need and do not try to upset anything else while we keep trying to expand our cities and destroy nature. An example of Americans trying to control nature is through projects like dams and mowing the lawn. Mowing the lawn is disrespecting nature because we are controlling how long it grows. Native Americans would just let it grow and leave it be. Another way we can compare these two cultures is how they protect the environment. The Native American Chief Seattle said “I have seen a thousand rotting buffalos...left by the white man”. This shows how wasteful Americans used to be and can still apply in today’s society. We are getting better though, through the use of renewable energies. Americans are starting to use the sun and wind to create energy instead of harming the Earth to get it. Native Americans were more like the people who are trying to get renewable energies. The Native Americans only used what they needed and never more. They left the environment how they found it which is like what Americans today are doing through conservation efforts and alternative energy sources. Finally, we can compare and contrasts the way Native Americans and current Americans understand the world around them. The Native Americans used stories to try and explain the unknown events. These stories are like the way we use religion today. Both are used to explain how or why things happen so people can start trying to understand. A difference would be how we use science. We try to explain everything with science and leave nothing to the imagination. The Native Americans were the exact opposite because they would rather think and
In the Age of Exploration these are two of the recorded encounters of Native Americans and here is my comparison of those encounters. Each encounter was by a different explorer and were 27 years apart as well as many miles apart. With each encounter comes a difference in sophistication and how technologically advanced the Native Americans by Hernando Cortes in the Meso-America to those of the Native Americans encountered by Christopher Columbus on the islands of the Caribbean. The main differences revolved around how their weapons were made, what constituted housing for each group,
Before 1492, when Columbus sailed the ocean blue, there were many tribes living in North America. Two equally similar and different ones were the Iroquois tribe and the Cherokee tribe. On one hand, they are similar because of their geographies and their economies. On the other hand, they are different because of their cultures and religious beliefs.
Native American’s food was not processed and their homes and resources not shipped from overseas. Men, women and children lived off the land that Mother Nature provided them with. Both Cornell and Krech discuss the importance of Native American’s involvement and appreciation with nature, yet both debunk the stereotype of Native’s being one and respecting the earth and its inhabitants to the utmost respect. Krech distinguishes the term “ecological” from “conservationist” due to Native American’s having an appreciation for nature and all its inhabitants but not for conserving, from interpreting the text, conservation was the act of conserving resources for themselves and claiming ownership of land due to resources. Having such a strong connection to the lands they lived in Native American’s felt strong ownership, especially since “prior to
The Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida, they inherited all of these lands from their ancestors who cultivated for generations. According to Elias Boudinot the natives considered themselves to be just as equal as the Whites, he states, “What is an Indian? Is he not formed of the same materials with yourself?” (Boudinot, 1826) The natives saw themselves to be no different from the Whites, in fact they cared for one another as a whole, they lived in kinships, where there was never an Indian left alone without a family. They followed a society based off of the concept of interdependence, they had in their mind that everything is dependent of something. The Indians were very advanced, and were able to prosper in their society, although the Whites believed otherwise, and believed that the natives were uncivilized.
The Native American’s way of living was different from the Europeans. They believed that man is ruled by respect and reverence for nature and that nature is an
The Native Americans, at the time of the first encounter, were still very culturally and socially primitive compared to the Europeans. They moved a lot, lived mainly of fishing and hunting, spent their time cultivating and used primitive tools and equipment in their daily activities.
Europeans lived a much more modern way of life than the primitive lifestyle of Native Americans. Europeans referred to themselves as “civilized” and regarded Native Americans as “savage,” “heathen,” or “barbarian.” Their interaction provoked by multiple differences led to misunderstanding and sometimes conflict. These two cultures, having been isolated from one another, exhibited an extensive variation in their ideals. Europeans and Native Americans maintained contradictory social, economic, and spiritual practices.
Native Americans were the first environmentalists and horticulturists. They were the spirit world was embodied in every part of the natural world, whether animal, vegetable or mineral. Survived by being big game hunters and/or fisherman. They would settle in different regions and form independent tribes with distinct Indian cultures. According to Bible Scripture, by 1492 there were over 300 Native American languages. Native Americans left so much history for people today and how America got started. Many people don't realize how much the Indians achieved during the time.
My experience is a bit different compared to other minority group experiences because I am a Caucasian American with Hispanic from Central America. People from a minority of Native American, African American, Muslim American, Chinese/Japanese American, and Jewish American would all have a complete unalike experience compared to me. Central Americans and Vietnamese Americans I feel it is rare for these two cultures to come together and that is what makes my experience so unique to the situation. A similarity and the only similarity I could find between Central Americans and Vietnamese Americans is they both immigrated to the United States. Central America immigration has increased significantly and added to the diversity in the United States.
The essay “Letter to President Pierce” written by Chief Seattle in 1855 lays out some of the biggest differences between white American culture and the culture of Native Americans. The essay is very brief in length but it does address many points that can be take farther. Chief Seattle begins the essay with simple stating the obvious; that everyone already knows white men and natives do not understand each other’s ways of living. He continues this by saying that even though the land that each of them hold is the same the way that it is handled could make you think otherwise. Chief Seattle believes that white man tires to fight and pillage everything rather work with it. This is the start of one of the biggest differences between the two cultures. By acting this way Seattle thinks that white man has no real connection to his culture because he continuously moves on from place to place leaving behind anything that was built by his ancestors. However, he contradicts himself by saying that maybe his thoughts are wrong because he is only a savage. The next main point that Seattle addresses is how he compares the silence of nature rather than all of the manmade noise of cities. He questions his stance on the noise pollution made by cities and asks if the only reason he does not like it is because he has not learned the “civilization” of it. Seattle believes in working with nature and what the world has given us, so that humans will last. He makes a strong point that if something
After reading and listening to the lectures, I would have first enacted laws that would do away with underminding the Great Plains Indians knowledge of their homeland and authority they had over their people. Having dealt with Indian relations for over 200 years, I believe that the people of the United States, white or indian, should be treated fairly on their own land. Creating individual towns and territorys for both whites and indians would create even more tention, so rather than seperating each race the I would create united communities consisting of both whites and indians on both white land and indian land. Living in a community were both races are next door to each other and are trading items, would allow for relationships to grow much
“It is a dream. It is what people who have come here from the beginning of time have dreamed. It’s a dream landscape. To the Native Americans, it’s full of sacred realities, powerful things. It’s a landscape that has to be seen to be believe. And as I say on occasion, it may have to be believed in order to be seen.” –N. Scott Momaday
Additionally, Royal gives clarification for Native Americans’ positive stereotypes. He explains, “ But this is far from modern concepts of ecology. Native Americans in fact overhunted deer and beaver even before the arrival of the white man, and did not seriously try to preserve the resources in the vicinity of their villages. As a result, the typical woodland village, having exhausted local soil and game, had to move on average every eight to 10 years” (Royal 47). Although the Native Americans did not destroy the environment like Europeans on such a large scale, they are not trying to protect the environment either. This opposes the stereotypes that Native Americans are model ecologists. Royal also examines the inhumane sides of Native American tribes. Royal reveals, “The
In modern day society, Americans are immersed in unnatural cultural norms. These set of cultural guidelines do not allow us to experience nature in its beautiful and natural form. We ignore it. Everyday Americans go through the same routine: wake up, go to work, come home, watch TV, go to sleep, and repeat. This routine is abnormal because we waste our lives away by not seeing the world as it is meant to be seen.
Many indigenous religions and cultures viewed the earth with great respect and reverence. This can be seen through their kinship with the land, their belief in animism, their hunter/hunted relationship, and their origin stories.