Murder on a Sunday Morning

Do you have any recent example of this from a recent case that you can tell me about?

In the Tinker vs. Des Moines court case the judges decided for Tinker even though both arguments from the lawyers where not well made. The judge’s decision was made by who they thought they should go for even though both sides had bad arguments and made a bigger deal of this case than what it should really be.

Not only was the gun used in the murder found in a location found pretty much impossible for Butler to walk to (nine and a half miles away from the hotel where the murder was committed), but they did not test the gun for evidence once it was recovered. So with all that being said let us just recap.

Judges are often required to decide a verdict in case heard in a court of law. This decision has tremendous weight and often may decide the future of the defendant. The law can be exceedingly difficult to translate; consequently, a few may interpret the facts and the law differently. When a defendant believes a judge’s decision to be in error, he or she may wish to appeal a decision. In fact, the United States Courts (2015) indicated, “The defendant may appeal a guilty verdict, but the government may not appeal if a defendant is found not guilty. Either side in a criminal case may appeal with respect to the sentence that is imposed after a guilty verdict” (para. 5). In Jackson County, there were a multitude of appeals for the decisions that the judges handed down; however, what is the probability that an appeals court will overturn the decision?

Almost every day, we hear about justice being served upon criminals and we, as a society, feel a sense of relief that another threat to the public has been sentenced to a term in prison, where they will no longer pose a risk to the world at large. However, there are very rare occasions where the integrity of the justice system gets skewed and people who should not have been convicted are made to serve heavy prison sentences. When word of this judicial misstep reaches the public, there is social outcry, and we begin to question the judicial system for committing such a serious faux pas.

Over the years over 200,000 kids are arrested and tried as adults each year. In the book “Monster” A 17 year old teen named Steve Harmon is put into jail because he is waiting for trial. He is waiting for trial because there was a murder of a store owner named Aguinaldo Nesbit. In the movie “Murder on a Sunday morning” a 15 year old teen who is African American is falsely accused of murdering an elderly tourist in Florida. While he is in jail he is being abused mentally and physically.

If the judiciary allows the exception to pass, then they set a bad example for the individuals

Through all the ups and downs, the United States justice system continues to face obvious issues in itself causing a problematic government.

Synopsis: Our story follows a economist from Harvard University called Henry Spearmen who takes a vacation from his life of writing books and lectures to go to the virgin islands with his Wife. However, as they reach their resort (Cinnamon bay) they quickly find that there is trouble in paradise as radical black power groups are spreading their influence on the island and wish to harm the tourism industry by harassing white visitors. Nonetheless the couple enjoy their stay and meet colorful characters such as Mr.Dyke a fellow Harvard professor of theology, a vacationing couple called the Clarks and General Decker: a strict and demanding military official that earns

Doug finds himself in a very difficult situation and he cant decide whether to do what he knows is right and not except this foolish trade, or what he wants to do because of his longing for Ralph’s friendship. When Doug begins to him reminisce about these memories we see he’s changed a little bit. He hated himself as if it was his fault back then and now as things have gone on that anger has built up substantially. The difference is now that anger has redirected almost completely at Ralph. He tries to solve this conflict within himself by blaming everything on Ralph. This only makes things worse by reversing that anger to Ralph causing Doug to decide to kill him.

The National Geographic film, A Portrait of a Killer, examines the types of stress that living beings can endure, and how it can thus affect the rest of their bodies. Severe chronic stress can lead even lead to the destruction of brain cells. Dr. Robert Sapolsky is a neurobiologist of Stanford University who has been researching stress for over thirty years. In order to study stress and its implications upon nonhumans, he went to Africa to study baboons. This species has only three hours of stress caused by eating, and the rest of their daily routine is consumed by about nine hours of free time. Much like Western society, baboons socially stress out one another, as they have social hierarchies to regulate how them interact with one another.

The detective genre is recognizable by the mystery that it represents or establishes. Every word of a fiction novel is chosen with a purpose, and that purpose on a detective novel is to create suspense. The excerpts from The Big Sleep by Raymond Chandler, Murder Is My Business by Lynette Prucha, and Devil in a Blue Dress by Walter Mosley, create an atmosphere of suspense and mystery. Even though they all fit into this category, there are some differences that make each novel unique. The imagery that the authors offer in the excerpts helps the reader to distinguish the similarities and the differences.

Since 1923, when Judge Learned Hand said that the American judicial system “has always been haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted,” the issue of wrongful conviction has been acknowledged to man (Halstead, 1992; Huff, Rattner, Sagarin, & MacNamara, 1986). After the judge made his innocuous statements, serious study of this phenomenon began. Contrary to the statement the judge made, time and technology have revealed that an unquantifiable number of wrongfully convicted persons have served prison terms and even been executed for crimes they did not commit and some that did not even occur. Research into wrongful conviction was virtually nonexistent until Professor Edward Brochard of Yale University published his book Convicting the Innocent in 1932. This book documented 65 such cases, addressed the legal causes of miscarriage, and offered suggestions to reform. Subsequently, numerous other researchers began conducting case studies and publishing findings that affirmed that wrongful conviction represents a systematic problem within the American judicial process (Huff, 2002).

What happened: In tis event there were two parts, the first part is when Jace and Tasha go to see Lucille Horstbueller the daughter of deceased Evart Horstbueller a waiter at the Café the night of the murder. So basically what happened was Jace and Tasha were stuck at a dead end and then Tasha remembered that Evart Horstbueller would always get picked up by his daughter at the end of shifts. If he saw anything that night Tasha and Jace are hoping he told her so they can get a new lead. When Jace and Tasha arrive to her house she mistakes them for piano students for her next class then she invites them into her house. So when Jace and Tasha get settled in her house and they start telling her that they and not actually piano students and they are here to see if she knows anything about the murder of Tasha’s mother.Just like that Lucille started getting ancy and told Jace and Tasha to please leave her house now and don’t come back. So Jace and Tasha did just that they left her house and sat in Jace’s car to see if she did anything suspicious, after about an hour of waiting they saw her get in her car and drive away. Jace tried to keep up but with stop lights and traffic they weren 't able to all they saw was Lucille drove to a farm land looking area.

The China Syndrome was a very interesting movie, because my generation does not really understand what it was like in the 1970s or even much about nuclear weapons or power. I personally find documentary interesting because they can teach us so much about the past so we do not make the same mistakes. I first learned about nuclear power by watching a YouTube documentary of the Chernobyl accident.