To what extent do the female protagonists in As You Like It and Much Ado About Nothing fit the archetypal structure of literature? … Rosalind and Beatrice, Celia and Hero How does Shakespeare create the female characters through archetypes? How are the themes of love accurately portrayed? How are female archetypes in Shakespeare’s As you Like it and Much Ado about nothing similar and different to modern women? How does Shakespeare fight against the normal archetypes? How does Shakespeare use archetypes to his advantage? The Talented Mr. Ripley by Patricia Highsmith and Macbeth.-Why are they similar? What archetypes can we find in them? Much Ado about nothing and Confessions of a Triple Shot Betty by Jody Gehrman-Archetypes. Romiette and Julio-(bullying and racism) with Romeo and Juliet- How we see those archetypes…modern twist? West Side Story and Romeo and Juliet In Shakespeare’s comedic play “Much Ado about Nothing” there are many unique characters but the character Beatrice sticks out for many reasons. Beatrice is not like the other characters in “Much Ado about Nothing.” She “rebels” against the idea of conformity and humility that was prevalent during that time period for women; therefore, she fit the archetype of …show more content…
Shakespeare created his own archetypal structure when he wrote tragedies and comedies. In tragedies everyone dies. In comedies everyone gets married. Across each tragedy and comedy similarities with other tragedies and comedies can be found. That’s because, once again, it’s archetypal literature. The characters especially as far as women go consist of “the weak one”- (Ophelia, Juliet, (although not really because she loved her parents enemies), Hero and many others. Shakespeare created a new type of literature with women that were stronger and rebellious and perhaps had power like Rosalind and Beatrice in “As you like it,” and “Much Ado about
Shakespeare couldn’t have picked a better character to add to his play. Beatrice, with her quick wit and humor, is easily the spotlight stealer in Much Ado about Nothing. She possesses many great qualities that the other characters lack and ultimately gets the story going and captures the audience’s attention.
Differences between Beatrice and Hero in the early scenes of Shakespeare’s play ‘Much Ado about Nothing’
Every single human being, at some point in their life, has had a role model. When Queen Elizabeth was at the peak of her rule, she was a huge role model for many women across the nation. She ruled a prominently male dominant society. Women like Beatrice, strong and independent, were not common. The more normal example of a women of those days would be Hero. Hero is a quiet character who does what she is told. Beatrice, when this play was first written, was found comedic. In contrast to today, Beatrice is respected as a strong women. Shakespeare uses Beatrice’s independence to contrast Hero’s obedience and toys with the social standards of the Elizabethan society to make his play the one of the best comedies of his time.
Female gender roles have greatly changed from now and the sixteen hundreds when Shakespeare wrote the popular play Much Ado About Nothing. Women were raised to believe they were inferior to men. Women were taught that men should be the one who brings in money and women should stay home to clean and bare children. Also women were given no choice in who they were to marry or when. Over hundreds of years women realized that they were just as good as men and that they should be treated equally. This essay will cover the analysis of the women’s gender roles in the play Much Ado About Nothing, showing the analysis of Beatrice not following any stereotypes, Hero following all of the stereotypes, and Margaret not getting the same stereotypes as other women because she is a servant.
One of the most intriguing characters from Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing must be Beatrice. An intelligent, well-spoken (and, perhaps more interesting, outspoken) young woman, she is an almost exact opposite of her cousin, Hero. What makes Beatrice so different than what one expects of a woman during Shakespeare’s time? Why did Shakespeare decide to make her such a strong female character? It begs the question of what women were actually like in the Tudor era, and if she was really so radical a character.
Midterm: Much Ado About Nothing Classic, best-beloved, most popular, most entertaining, frequently preformed, funny- those are the descriptions used when recounting Shakespeare’s play Much Ado About Nothing. Written between 1598 and 1599, on the surface Much Ado About Nothing is simply a comedy that portrays various instances of love. However, it is much more than that; Much Ado brings to light the harsh cultural morals of the era in which it was written. Underneath the comedic nature of the play, Shakespeare examines the sociality gendered double standards, and how they affected his female characters. I plan to explore how others view the comedy, Much Ado About Nothing, specifically in relation to how they perceived the female characters,
In William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, a family is residing in Italy where two tales of love unfold, in a plot filled with deceit and lies. It is seen that there is the constant, but underlined, presence of the struggles of the role that women partake in society through the actions of Beatrice and Hero. Through the character foils of Beatrice and Hero, Much Ado About Nothing suggests that men are stronger and dominant over women, if they like it or not, and therefore, men’s words are held more respectable and truthful than those of women. An active pattern in Beatrice is that she subconsciously admits that men are portrayed as stronger and more dominant, though she still scorns them.
During the Shakespearean era, gender roles differed substantially from the modern world. Patriarchal society made women seen as subordinate to men, therefore idealized women that were obedient to men, innocent, and pure. Both genders were expected to get married and have a family. Hero exhibits the stereotypical women during this era, given that she was a quiet, polite, feminine, weak, obedient, and submissive to
William Shakespeare’s tragedy “Macbeth” completely challenges the idea of traditional gender roles and social norms during the renaissance period. The male characters have many feminine traits while the female characters have many more masculine and manlier traits. This was going entirely against the stereotypical outlook of the roles you’re supposed to play as your gender during that time of history. During the renaissance period women were only expected to clean, cook, and to have babies. Men on the other hand were typically expected to work hard and to provide for the home. Socially women didn’t have power or respect and men were the ones who were supposed to be brave and tough at the best of times and the worst of times. That idea is
During the Renaissance, it was common for women to behave in a certain manner in a patriarchal society. Women were subordinate to any man in their life, whether it was a husband or a father. However, Shakespeare creates female roles in his plays that often steer away from the common script. These women challenge, deceive, and steal from these men, including one’s closest to them in their lives. In Merchant of Venice, young Portia and Jessica are two examples of these strayed female characters. They feel trapped in the hands of their father’s and do their best to break free of that hold. In Much Ado About Nothing, Hero is a young woman who feels her relationship with
This essay is an exploration of the play Much Ado About Nothing, and the gender roles involved in the deceit and trickery that transpire and develop throughout the story. As gender is one of the main themes in the plot, identifying the expected gender roles of the characters, and how the contrast between characters highlights these expected roles. In Shakespeare 's time, known as the Elizabethan Era, men and women’s roles and expectations were starkly different. Elizabethan women, no matter what social class, were inferior to men. A female’s role in the family was to get married so they could increase their family 's wealth and power and to produce heirs. Men, on the other hand, had all of the power within a household. Males were expected
Shakespeare and Webster represent the female characters in ‘Hamlet’ and ‘The duchess of Malfi’ by using general themes such as the patriarchy and the social control, the female identity and its independence, this institution of marriage, the expressions of sexuality and finally women shown to be either conformist or transgressive. Men were firmly in control in the Elizabethan and Jacobean era, and the expectations for women were to stay home, cook, clean and raise a family. Women’s status and roles were subject to the Tyranny of patriarchy, they were given strict disciplinary rules to follow whether by law or unspoken norms to prevent from rebellion. Women’s rights were restricted, legally, socially and economically, unlike today were women are more powerful and independent. Today women and men are seen to be equal and women can do pretty much everything a man can do (voting, working, becoming president) although there are many people still today who disagree with women having these rights.
With social and cultural stereotypes in this era, men were viewed as more powerful while women were portrayed as weak. William Shakespeare tries to interpret the roles between genders by having characters of the opposite sex. In the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare uses rhetorical devices to demonstrate Macbeth’s and Lady Macbeth’s switch in traditional gender roles, which arise from the consequences for each character’s actions and speech.
The women in the play are positive, optimistic, clever and brave, especially Mistress Ford and Mistress Page. They seem to be such “merry” but actually they are faithful to their family and love. At that time, the society put women at a very low status, and they had to obey their parents and husbands and had no rights to speak. The new female image that Shakespeare had built up is the biggest strike to the feudal thought. In the play, they also fight against men which he was looking forward to a bright society. This kind of new female image is a representation of
When one considers Shakespeare’s female characters, one has to remember that the plays were written in a time when women were considered weak-minded creatures who were apt to make bad choices if given the freedom. Shakespeare, for the most