preview

Mr. Sterling Shooting Summary

Better Essays

On Tuesday July 6, 2016 at approximately 12:15 a.m. 37 year old Alton Sterling was shot and killed by two police officers responding to a disturbance call. The altercation between Mr. Sterling and the two officers occurred at the Triple S Food Mart in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The two officers involved in the shooting have been identified as 28 year old Blane Salamoni, and 28 year old Howie Lake II. Both officers used physical force to bring Mr. Sterling to the ground, but it is unclear through the video which officer used their gun to shoot Mr. Sterling or if both officers shot him.
Both Officer Blane, and Officer Lake were initially responding to a disturbance call in which the complainant said that a large black male wearing a red shirt selling …show more content…

Sterling shortly after arriving at the location. The food mart owner, who was a witness to the incident, then said that officers shot a Taser gun at Sterling, but he did not drop to the ground immediately, which prompted the officers to wrestle him to the ground. It was at this point that one of the officers yelled that Mr. Sterling had a gun which lead to the officers to shoot him. In the videos taken by eyewitnesses, it can be seen that Mr. Sterling was on the ground with his back on the pavement. Both officers were on top of him trying to gain control of him, when one of the officers spots what looks like a gun. The officer proceeds to yell out he’s got a gun, and the other officer tells Sterling not to move. They yell out he’s going for the gun once before shooting Sterling a total of six times in his chest. According to officers, they used the amount of force they used because once they saw his weapon the level of danger increased. They not only had an obligation to protect themselves, but the public as well which is why they felt as though shooting Sterling was the right action to …show more content…

From the video, it looks like things escalated quickly between the officers and Sterling. The Officers could have spent more time talking to Sterling, and the might have even been able to ask him if he had a weapon on him instead of finding it once they wrestled him to the ground. They could have also resorted to using the Taser gun on him again once he was on the ground instead of pulling out their guns. By doing this I feel as though the situation would have gone more calmly than it did. It would have prevented anyone from getting shot which would have allowed officers to fulfill their four goals which were stated before. Sterling would have never been killed, and everyone’s safety would have been protected. If this situation were looked at from a hypothetical standpoint things could have turned out differently. Sterling could have gained possession of his gun while they were wrestling and shot off a few rounds before the officers shot him, or Sterling might have just let the officers take the weapon from him before things escalated. The second hypothetical scenario would have been the best outcome because everyone would have been safe, the officers would have made their arrest and Sterling’s rights would not have been

Get Access