preview

Morris Kent Research Paper

Decent Essays

Never being able to see your friends and family seems like something unimaginable but for Morris Kent because of his own actions has to live in a nightmare for the rest of his life. Morris Kent was arrested at the age of 16 for 3 counts of robbery, 3 counts of home robberies and worst of all 2 counts of rape. Because of the severity of the crimes the prosecutor moved to try morris as an adult as the punishment would be more severe, but morris’s lawyer didn’t want to have Morris tried as an adult so he planned to argue that Morris had a “mental illness” so the case would stay in juvenile court but in the end the judges ruled against Morris and for the prosecutor. As a result Kent’s punishment was more severe at a sentence of 30 to 90 years in prison but Morris not agreeing with the decision the judges had made Morris appealed stating that the case should have stayed in juvenile court but as the judges didn’t feel the same way about the case they ruled …show more content…

United States related to the eighth amendment rights of citizens in the united states. In the case of Kent v. United States, the Supreme Court made the correct decision. First of all the crimes that kent had committed were to severe to stay in juvenile court and as it says in the article “In deciding whether to remove a case from juvenile court ,judges must consider the seriousness of the crime.”(Upfront) Judges not only take into consideration the severity of a crime but also the criminal background of the defendant. With Morris having a criminal background it helped persuade the judges into having Morris trialed as an adult instead of a juvenile.Lastly judges when looking at a case they take into consideration age since Morris was 16 and was close to becoming an adult it gave that extra push to have the case settled in adult court. All in all to the judges the crimes were severe enough that having Morris tried as an adult was a better solution then Morris being tried as a

Get Access