1. I think the movie it titled “More than Honey”, because the director is trying to make a statement about the important role bees play in our society, and how he we grossly underestimate the importance of preserving them. The movie provides us, the viewers, with some of statistics to illustrate the importance of bees in our world. For example, we learn that 80% of plant species require bees to be pollinated, a third of our food wouldn’t exist without bees, and the value of bees pollination is over $15 billion.
2. The American beekeeper John Miller seemed to be much more motivated by hid commercial interests than Fred Jaggi is. When we first hear him in the movie, he is arriving at one of his facilities and says that the sound of the bees buzzing sounds like money to him. Through out the movie Miller makes statements that show us he sees his bees as commodities. The director attempts to learn more about the mystery surrounding “colony collapse disorder”. When we see Miller himself fall victim to this phenomenon, his reaction is very revealing. He claims that he doesn’t have a personal connection to the bees and will not mourn or be hurt by their deaths. Miller frustration with the “colony collapse disorder” comes from the loss of potential profits that comes with the death of the bees. This is
…show more content…
The tone of the documentary is alarmist. The movie starts of trying to appeal the views affection for bees with narrator, director and writer, Markus Imhoof, telling us about his family’s history bee keeping. He goes on to present the pollination process with attractive imagery and engaging language. The movie then transitions into telling the viewers how important this beautiful process is to our society. After implanting these positive thoughts and perceptions of bees and pollination in the minds of the viewers, the documentary takes a dramatic turn and starts to show us how these wonderful creatures are dying in mass, and how we are close to losing this
When I first read through Nathanael Johnson’s article discussing the fall of bee populations in relation to a catastrophic unearthly demise, I kept an open mind. With my personal opinion about the bee crisis stifled, I read on to see if Johnson could aptly convince me of his argument. Unsurprisingly, he failed.
The honey bee population is going down, and while most people think it doesn't really matter or just don’t notice it, they should because it is a very big problem. I think the other people should try and change that. If bees die then it will not be good, at all. In this persuasive piece of writing, I will be trying to make people rethink about the bee population, and what it could potentially do to the human race.
Volk is a writer for Discover magazine and he follows around Darren Cox who is a 50 year old beekeeper who tries to make a change. The biggest question they are trying to answer is what is killing the bees, and how can it be stopped? Cox’s bees do not produce the amount of honey they used to and he would like to see an answer. Another point they consider is that the bees are not only dying, but they are weakening. He believes that the quality of work that bees put out is diminishing, which is then leading to the decrease in the quality of the honey in recent years. Volk’s article helps display how losing bees will impact us significantly. As far as solving the bee problem it is not what I was looking for but, I will use it as an example of what needs to change.
Jacobsen’s objectives in writing Fruitless Fall: The Collapse of the Honey Bee and the Coming Agricultural Crisis, are the world’s bees disappearance, pollinator crisis, and the overall the incline of human agricultural crisis. I believe anyone who read Fruitless Fall can be honked to the book. It is an easy to read, and not too many difficult scientific words, so if people in other areas read it they can understand it too because it is highly
The documentary called "More than Honey" directed by Markus Imhoof released on June 12, 2013, takes the viewers and explains why bees are necessary, what they do and most importantly what is causing them to die. This film takes the spectator to a much deeper understanding of what bees are like living in their natural habitat on a daily. Also how they are at risk of catching diseases and parasites. The strongest area of this documentary was logos they really enforced and expanded on the fact that bees are essential to growing fruit but they didn’t use much emotion though when they did it was very effective last it fell short on ethos.
The bees believed that a communist society where they owned their own means of production would be a better life for them, but as Montgomery, the humans lawyer lost the trial he warned Barry that ‘a negative shift in the balance of nature is imminent’. As it turned out, the immense amass of honey put every bee out of a job, including the vitally important Pollen Jocks and Barry’s best friend Adam. Barry now believes he lives in an ideal world where no one has to work for anything ‘I don’t understand why they aren’t happy! We have so much now’ (Benson, Bee Movie 2007). The bees realised that living in the communist society was not the ideology they had wanted, now the bees didn’t need to make honey they had no work to do, this put bee kind in jeopardy as without bees making honey they was no pollination so the flowers were dying
In the Secret Life of Bees it shows how people may act one way but feel another, how loves isn’t fixed or certain, and it showed that people are perceived
There are a few weaknesses within an otherwise delightful read. First, though well-researched, the author neglects to acknowledge the impact that multinational corporations have on the beekeeping and agricultural industries, especially where monocultures are concerned. If individual farmers did not compete with the corporations, they would lose their heritage, farms and livelihoods. They observe multinationals using monocultures and perhaps believe monocropping is the only plausible way to contend. Next, Jacobsen theorizes that honeybees are trying to collapse, evolutionarily, in order to become stronger and that human economics and addiction to honey will not allow this to take place. This is a weak argument as evolution takes its own course - this detracts from his argument for a complex reasoning for CCD. Finally, instead of including the controversial feral-type hive within the pages of the main book, he relegates it to the appendices, where the reader might have no exposure to it. I found this to be the most interesting topic in the book - it offers a natural solution to mite infestation, explains how honeybees act in the wild, and provides twice as much honey if this simple non-technique is
But the history of the spread of sugar could have only happened to this extent because of its unparalleled appeal to humans. The sweet taste is undeniably connected to the finer things in life, celebrations like engagements and weddings in many cultures are not complete with out some sweet treat. It is engrained in our world. So why are humans so inclined to like this sweet taste. One reason that is given by That Sugar Film is that our love for sucrose comes from our primate heritage.The human tongue can detect four basic flavors — salt, sour, bitter and sweet, but humans are naturally drawn to sweet because we evolved from primates that ate fruit in the trees.
The honey bee is vital to an estimated $117 billion annual production of crops through pollination within the United States more than a half of the food that humans consume has a correlation with the bee either directly or indirectly. The USDA reports the following food products would be immediately damaged if no bees were available to pollinate:
Bee Movie is a 2007 children’s animated film, produced by popular comedian Jerry Seinfeld. The film centers around protagonist Barry B. Benson, a young male bee dissatisfied with the way his fellow workers are forced to live their lives. Bee movie works as an example of class division and social uprising within a society. Although the difference between the proletariat and bourgeoisie extend farther than socioeconomic standing, as the bourgeoisie in this scenario are a different species, this film still works as a model for societal divide. The relationship between bees and the humans in Bee Movie represents the exploitation and alienation of proletariat workers, and how class division can lead to revolution.
That Sugar Film is a 2014 documentary directed and hosted by Damon Gameau. The health documentary is focused on an audience of mainly parents, families, and teenagers, and its main topic and purpose is to point out the risks of sugar in your diet and to convince to stop the consumption of sugar in diets through an experiment where he himself is the protagonist. The main techniques of this documentary are graphics and music to keep people focused on its documentary; he also used clips and interviews with scientists, doctors and other professionals as a technique to convince the audience of the veracity of his argument. During the whole documentary researchers, doctors and health professional give their opinion about sugar, food, the effects of a high sugar diet, the amount of sugar consumed depending on the food we eat even if we think that we are involved in a healthy diet. He does this through the graphics in which he uses visual effects (CGI-computer generated imagery) of them talking through egg boxes, yoghurt packs, advertising panels and different products in real life scenes.
The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees by E. Lily Yu tells the fictional story of the relationship between an overpowering wasp community and a docile bee community. The wasps take over the bees, basically rule over them, and instill their very different way of life on them. A group of anarchist bees that oppose the wasp government secretly escape and begin a new community. The story abruptly ends though when both the cartographer wasps and anarchist bees die from humans and the cold. Throughout The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees, Yu creates tension to build toward the climax.
Jim and Jan Nesti have been in the bee business for years and their bees aren’t dying. To keep their bees safe they had to know what’s killing the bees.
The Bee Movie is a film that shows the never ending struggle between good and evil. After Barry Benson leaves the hive and begins to talk to humans, he sees that the humans have been harvesting and eating honey without the bees’ knowledge. He finds out that bee farms exist and their only purpose is to make bees work and to take the honey from them; from Barry’s eyes humans are grossly mistreating the bees. When he first gets to the farm, Barry overhears two beekeepers talking: “They make the honey and we make the money” (Hickner, Bee Movie). The bees work extremely hard to make honey, so Barry is appalled that humans are greedily taking their entire life’s work. Because of this, Barry decides to file a lawsuit against all humans. The case is set up in a way that presents the humans as bullies and the bees as defenseless, harmless creatures. As Barry explains in his opening statement, the honey companies are “exploiting tiny helpless bees,” and back in the hive bee news anchors tell the public that humans are “packing [honey] and profiting from it illegally” (Hickner, Bee Movie). It becomes very clear that humans are evil and bees are inherently good. Also, during the trial, Ray Liotta suggests that “someone just step on [Barry] and [the people involved in the lawsuit] could all go home,” proving that humans do not care about bees (Hickner, Bee Movie). The theme of good versus evil is supported through the fact that the bees use honey, one of the movies motifs, for everything. They use it as antenna gel, soap, toothpaste, food, and they even fill pools with it; honey is an integral part of their daily life. It is everything they know and humans are taking it without their consent. As soon as bees are eligible, they start to make honey and they work until they die. Honey is literally their life’s work and the bees want a say in who gets to use it.