4. Clinician did not visit with the parents of the Minor Child. However, Clinician spoke with the Minor Child’s mother by phone regarding the guardianship review and indicated she does not do not have any concerns. The biological father of the Minor Child has not be identified.
5. The court granted full guardianship of Minor Child to the parental grandfather and step grandmother, Carl Smith Jr. and Kimberly Smith. Jamie Smith, the mother of the Minor Child, lives in Pinckney, Michigan with a close family friend and is currently employed at Jets Pizza. The mother has been making strides in her substance abuse since her release from incarceration in October of 2016. The mother of the Minor Child is currently on parole and has to do random drops
…show more content…
In the Minor Child’s bedroom, she had a drawer for storing all of her toys. The kitchen was well stocked with a sufficient amount of healthy food and snacks. The guardian explained that they began a health kick and were watching closely what they eat. The fridge contained fruit, vegetables, milk, and various other foods.
10. It is necessary to continue the guardianship for the following reasons: The Minor Child has had a positive and healthy relationship with her guardians all of her life. The guardian provides the Minor Child with all the necessities of life, including a comfortable safe home, with sufficient food, clothing, love and affection. The mother is unable to provide the Minor Child with adequate financial support or a continuous stable emotional environment.
11. If the guardianship is continued, the effect on the welfare of the Minor Child will be as follows: the Minor Child will continue to grow in a consistent and stable environment with her grandparents, who are raising the Minor Child. The guardians allow the biological mother to be a part of the Minor Child’s life. The Minor Child will continue to receive the medical care, education, and socialization that will allow the Minor Child to continue her healthy
According to many the custody of a child should be determined with the best interest of the child in mind. However, it is not easy for a
According to Encyclopedia: Child Custody (2003), “ Application of the best interests of the child criterion implies that the court's decision will provide the very best possible solution for the child.”
(c) If the child is actually residing with a grandparent in a stable relationship, whether the court has awarded custody or visitation to the grandparent or not,
A report was received on 06/05/2017 alleging that the mother (Hermionne) left Ashante (C-V 17) with a non-relative since 02/2017 without any legal rights. According to the report, the mother refuses to take her child back home and will not engage with Ms. Aarons (caretaker) to provide legal documentation for the child to be enroll in school and taken to a Primary Care Physician. Ashante has not been is school for the past 4 months and are unable to enroll in school without paperwork. According to the report, Ashante self mutilates her arms, and the mother refuses to get counseling. The report indicates Ashante was to follow-up with a Cardiologist for a chest pain and the mother refuses to take her to the doctor.
Again, Section 24 authorizes the court to determine immediate “removal of a child from his home for the only reason to protect the child from serious abuse or neglect.” See Care & Protection of Robert. According to G.L. c. 119, Section 1, the court must “take into account the presumption that a child’s best interests generally are best served if the child is able to remain with her natural
A mandate of the AFSA is that juvenile court judges terminate parental rights of biological parents who fail to reunify with their children. The law also states that parental rights should be terminated for parents whose children are in foster care for fifteen months within the last twenty-two months. According to the ASFA act once parental rights are terminated, children can longer return home to their biological parents and the parents are no longer entitled to rights meaning they no longer carry rights to the child. The juvenile court judge now will act as the parent of the children until they are placed up for adoption. ASFA gives state courts the option to allow juvenile court judges not to terminate parental rights in certain circumstances. One circumstance occurs when a child is in kinship care home placement. Juvenile courts usually do not terminate parental rights when children have long-term placement with relatives. Another situation would be when parental rights cannot be terminated is when the existing evidence that termination of parental rights are not in the best interest of the child. The determination of compelling evidence is at the discretion of the juvenile court judge. Last when a child welfare agency fails to provide services to the families for the safe return of the child to his/her biological
3. Selenna has no current legal involvement. Selenna’s adoptive parent’s parental rights are terminated. There is a sibling in care.
There are many factors the court should contemplate before determining the guardian of Walter and his estate. The court will recognize that both parents are deceased and the guardian will most likely be the nearest ascendant in the line of the minor. If there is more than one relative available, the guardian will be chosen based upon the best interest of the child.
The concept of a guardian ad litem is for an individual, usually an attorney to provide assistance to a minor involved in the juvenile justice system. This representative is selected to provide recommendations to the court for the direction of actions believed to provide the best outcome for the child. Guardian ad litem’s are tasked with making sure the child is not lost in the court proceedings and due diligence is given to obtaining the best course of action for that child and family though the use of social service agencies.
The applicant has a child from a previous relationship, Adrian, age 18, who resides with her and there is no occurring problem regarding Adrian in this case.
Caseyn’s biological father failed to submit to assessments and treatments. He was employed at a roofing company and at an auto body shop. He is currently incarcerated. The biological father did not comply with the majority of the steps in his case plan. He refused to complete parenting classes, substance abuse counseling, and classes for battering. He surrendered his parental rights, without counseling, to Caseyn and his siblings on December 21, 2016 in the presence of the Agency’s Attorney, Courtney Franklin, and his Attorney, Varhonda Burrell.
For the most part, parents have the best interest of their children at heart. However, there are unfortunately many cases throughout the United States where parents are unable to, for one reason or another, take care of their children. Sometimes, this can be seen as a health issue of the parents. Sometimes, parents are unable to raise their children well due to physical, financial, and/or emotional issues. Other times, parents do not have the best interests of their children in mind and can be neglectful or abusive to them. In these circumstances, the state may become involved and step into
According to the Free Dictionary, a guardian ad litem is a guardian who is appointed by a judiciary court to represent the interests of an infant, an unborn child, or someone who is incompetent (and otherwise unable to adequately represent themselves) in cases of legal action. Generally, guardians are adults who are legally responsible for protecting the interests and wellbeing of their ward, who is typically a minor, but a guardian ad litem is a special kind of guardian whose relationship with a ward or minor has been created by a court order only for the duration of a certain legal action. Guardians ad litem are typically appointed by courts to be special representatives for minors including infants and small children or people who are mentally incompetent. These are groups of people who need the most help protecting their rights in court in legal actions.
The main two types are temporary and then full guardianship. Temporary guardianship is where the judge or someone else with authority gives them guardianship for a certain amount of time, sometimes days or even months. Also, under temporary guardianship guardians are normally appointed for emergency or short-term, it’s simpler than a full term. Temporary guardianships are limited and are not always used for guardianship, but sometimes it is an exception. Full guardianship is more long-term to where it’s last years. Full term guardianship is almost never terminated, but it can be terminated it’s just not always the case. There are other types of guardianship into these categories, but these two are the ones the others fall
guardians can reach their children, their kids friends, or just a young person in their community and