preview

Mike Rezendes 'Corruption In The Film Spotlight'

Decent Essays

Society relates corruption due to possession of power with the government or other politicians. People rarely think of those they trust, such as family members or closest friends. Despite that, some individuals use their positions to take advantage of that trust.
In Spotlight, a team within the Boston Globe called Spotlight investigates claims that priests are molesting children. The film follows the journalists gathering evidence of the corrupted system (Spotlight).
The characters in Spotlight each act base on moral, journalistic, or legal ethics.
Journalistic and legal ethics describe what individual can and cannot do due to the nature of their occupation (Chernow; Israel).
Moral ethics is what a person concludes as right or wrong based …show more content…

He feels a personal connection to the survivors, exclaiming “It could have been any of us!” (Spotlight).
Mike Rezendes is biased against the church, wanting to show the public what they have done so that no more children would have to suffer. Rezendes wanted to quickly print the article because he was afraid that in another newspaper’s hands, the article would only be swept under the rug.
This shows the audience that Rezendes places value in the journalistic ethic of completeness. Rezendes was scared that another newspaper would print the article ahead of them and not investigate the full story. However, by rushing the story the team will cut down on investigating and exclude valuable information. Rezendes, did not care for both sides of the story, which went against the journalistic ethic of fairness (Ethics Handbook). Although it may not be preferred to report the priests’ perspective, the story must be impartial (Spotlight).

With her Nana, Sacha Pfeiffer used to go to church three times a week. However, as she investigated further into the story, she stopped going. Pfeiffer has virtue ethics because out of concern, she decides not to tell her Nana about what she is

Get Access