The Mid South Grizzlies vs. National Football League case, was a case over sport franchise. The plaintiff-appellant, Mid- South Grizzlies (Grizzlies), sued the defendant, National Football League (NFL), under the the antitrust law stating that the Grizzlies were denied a franchise in the league under bad faith. This case would soon become what would insure professional leagues control over their decisions and how they are able to govern their current teams and applications for hopeful ones. The Grizzlies were a great hometown football team in Memphis, Tennessee that participated in the World Football League, the NFLs rival league. Around midseason in 1975 the Grizzles applied to the NFL for a full franchises within the NFL considering there …show more content…
The court stated the Grizzles failed to show any actual or potential injury to the economic competition. The NFL met with the Grizzles three times to hear their statements of why they should be added to the league, and had also already made the decision that expansion to the league was unnecessary before the Grizzlies application was even reviewed, they did however inform the team that they would receive “serious consideration” in the future if they were ever to expand. Therefore, the NFL was never making their decision unfairly, or treating the team poorly when it came to reviewing their application. The NFL was even able to show proof of this because of how sporadic the NFL expands their franchise, never having a set time or date when this events would occur. Also the Grizzles failed to prove that the league was abusing its power by not allowing them in because they are “rivals”, according to Judge Grim in a case a twenty years back over television policies within the NFL, he described that the professional teams “must not compete too well with each other in a business was, but on the playing field they must compete as hard as they can at all times.”. The NFL showed that they were only rivals when it came to the field, not in any business form whatsoever. The courts even saw that even though the NFL did not accept the Grizzles into the league, they still showed pro competitive interleague effects because the Grizzles were still able to become a franchise for a potential competitors league. After the courts decision on this case that the NFL was not in the wrong for not accepting the Grizzlies, this allowed no only the NFL but other professional sport teams to regulate their own memberships, and be in complete control with how their league will grow and become very
The U.S. Supreme Court Decision of Warford v. Lexington News-Herald is an example of how the court defined an assistant basketball coach at the University of Pittsburgh as a private figure. Reggie Warford complained about allegations of recruiting improperties that he committed as an assistant basketball coach. The issue at hand was originally posted in the 1985 Lexington Herald, but were reprinted in 1986 under a special NCAA reprint publication entitled 1985: A Year of Crisis in College Athletics. The 1986 publication is the source of the libel dispute.
Certain court cases have changed because of Amendments. The Gibbons v. Ogden case of 1824 was about a plaintiff, named Aaron Ogden, had purchased an interest in the monopoly to operate steam boats. Ogden brought suit in New York
Economic theory introduces us to four different types of markets: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. Professional sports teams operate in an environment that is different than the typical business structure. The goal of this paper is to look at this industry, in particular the NFL, in an economics context and gain an understanding of the market structure of this unique industry. To do this I will discuss a brief history of the National Football League in the U.S. and how this organization is structured. I will also discuss typical market structures and type of
This case is a good example of the “earnings game”. A dispute arose between the baseball team owners and the players association on the true profitability of the baseball business.
1. Discuss the factors that have resulted in the NFL becoming “America’s Game” and the
Symbolism in “The Grizzlies” In the movie “The Grizzlies” about a secluded arctic town struggling with suicide and poverty, a symbol that stood out to me was the name of the newly developed lacrosse team, the Grizzlies. In Indigenous culture, the grizzly is seen as an animal of transformation, one whose life can represent the good or bad changes we experience in our life cycle. In Indigenous and Inuit culture, the grizzly is a symbol of transformation and healing.
American Needle Inc. filed a suit in an Illinois district court against the NFL, NFLP, NFL teams, and Reebok, claiming that this exclusive license agreement violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 § U.S.C. 1, which outlaws any “contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade.” American Needle argued that because individual teams separately own their team logos and trademarks, their collective agreement to authorize NFLP to award the exclusive headwear license to Reebok, was a conspiracy to restrict other vendors' ability to obtain licenses for the teams' intellectual property.
I really do not obtain any financial help from my mother due to the fact that she is a single mother taking care of all expense on her own back at home. Therefore, I take care of all my expense such as apartment rent and utilities, car expenses, groceries, etc. I know that ATC would open up new experiences and would allow me to broaden my horizons by building relationships with my fellow Aggies. Any sort of financial help to attend ATC would be greatly
In some cases a schools decision to cut sports in order to comply with Title IX has lead to a lawsuit. An example of this would be Miami University. The university formed a committee to address the issue of Title IX compliance and hired a consultant as well. "The committee and consultant determined that in order to comply with Title IX, the university had the option of eliminating a few sports for men. As a result, the university eliminated the men's soccer, wrestling and tennis teams, effective at the end of the 1999 spring semester (Challenge 2002)." On November 18, 1999, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendants, claming that the defendants' elimination of the men's wrestling, tennis and soccer programs at Miami University, a state university of the State of Ohio and a recipient of federal funds, constituted gender discrimination in violation of the 20 U.S.C.& et seq. And violated their rights to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment (United 2002). The court found that the plaintiffs failed
While growing up in the state of Texas I was introduced to National Football League (NFL) at a very young age. Not only was I obsessed with great players like Emmitt Smith and Michael Irving, I had a more finical appreciation for the lucrativeness associated with the NFL. My young adulthood as well as my teenage years was spent playing and learning football with the aspirations of hopefully making it to the NFL. Unfortunately, my playing days ended with tryouts at Texas Tech University, but my love for the game has remained stagnant over the years even till this day. The NFL today is Americas most watched sports league and has taken the crown as the most lucrative and unique economic force in sports. Forbes offered approximations stating that on average, the NFL generates more than $6-9 billion a year in revenues alone. A third of the individual franchises in the league were appraised at over more than $1 billion while the other franchises average nine figures or higher. The NFL as an organization generates its revenues through a multitude of ways ranging from huge television contracts, in-stadium ticket sales, advertising ads paid for by sponsors and merchandise. Their business model unlike most other leagues, is centered on a hard salary cap on player contracts which provides cost certainty with its sponsors. In this paper, I will examine the economic and historical narrative associated with the growth of the NFL’s
Over the past little while I have researched and learned quite a bit about the NFL and fan to fan, I'd like to share with you my findings. First off, I would like to introduce myself. My name is Robbie Wolanski, proud fan of the Green Bay Packers, and avid football fan. I'm sure that when most of you think about the NFL you think about watching your team on Sunday, big hits, and Tom Brady. Let me give you something else to think about. Is the NFL a perfect corporation? Do they have any issues? Today I will be answering this and going into detail about the NFL.
The second factor was the development of competing leagues. “Competing leagues such as the American Football League, the American Baseball Association, the World Hockey Association, and the United States Football League offered an alternative to athletes (Masteralexis, 246).” These leagues offered higher salaries to induce players to move from their original teams. When players left a team to for more money, it also increased the salaries of players who stayed on the team. Agents played a crucial role in determining what was best for athletes, and which league they should choose.
Sports disputes fall into two general categories: external and internal. External sporting disputes are handled in a state Court system and generally include: "contract or tort; intellectual property; trade practices and competition; criminal law; taxation; broadcasting and media; and other statutory-based disputes" (Bellamy & Hayes, 2007, pp. 5-6). Internal sporting disputes are normally handled by sports tribunals and deal with
In 1961, Congress passed the Sports Broadcasting Act which allowed major professional sports to pool the broadcast rights of its member clubs to negotiate television broadcast agreements that normally would have violated federal antitrust laws. (21 Jeffery S. Moorad Sports Law Journal 577) This antitrust exemption enabled the NFL to protect its primary revenue source of live attendance by negotiating with the networks as to when and where games would be televised.
Among the terms of the agreement is that the settlement is not to be regarded as an admission of guilt by the league." The NFL knows of the dangers the players are in. The rules change but the equipment increased. Without more or better equipment the players are still in danger. In a PBS Frontline documentary about injuries in football Dr. Robert Stern said," In football, one has to expect that, almost every play of every game and every practice, they're going to be hitting their heads against each other. That's the nature of the game. Those things seem to happen around 1,000 to 1,500 times a year. Each time that happens, it's around 20 g or more. That's the equivalent of driving a car at 35 miles per hour into a brick wall." The players in the NFL know the risk of playing but it is up to the NFL to make the sport safe for the players. Many people may argue that since the players know the risk and they are paid for their athletic performance is ok. However you cannot put a price on a person health. There is no way of rationalizing the behavior of the NFL. Yes, the athletes are paid to perform, but it is up to the NFL to make the sport safer. The NBA has increase rules and is aggressively making the sport less physical. In a Radio interview with XTRA 910 a Phoenix, AZ, Former NBA player, Robert Horry said, "… If you