preview

Mercy Clinic Orthopedic Summary

Decent Essays

An X-ray of the claimant’s left foot performed on March 8, 2018 indicated previous remote trauma. Also indicated was advanced osteoarthritic degenerative changes in the left first metatarsophalangeal joint. The metatarsal fractures in the left foot were healed (Ex. 22F).

Dr. Justin Clayton at the Mercy Clinic Orthopedic Surgery evaluated the claimant on April 6, 2018. Dr. Clayton stated the claimant may have rheumatoid disease and prescribe him Meloxicam. In addition, he reported the claimant would be referred for further arthritis evaluation (Ex. 23F).

On May 15, 2018, the claimant reported to Dr. Sherilyn Webb at Healthy Connections – Mena that he was anxious and depressed. He was taking Paxil. He admitted to fleeting thoughts of …show more content…

Moreover, there are numerous inconsistencies in the claimant’ reports between the two psychological consultative examinations. For example, at the initial examination the claimant reported he dropped out of high school and got a GED. However, at the follow up examination, he indicated that he graduated from high school. At the initial examination, he reported that his longest job was for four years at a construction company. However, at the follow up examination he reported that his longest job was for 12 years as a foreman in construction. At the initial examination, the claimant reported he attended Henderson County Junior College. However, at the follow up examination, he reported he attended Trinity Valley College. At the initial examination, he reported he lives in the town of Wikieup and “likes where he currently lives.” At the follow up examination, he was very critical of the residence and did not like where he lived. The claimant was not cooperative at both consultative examination with numerous inconsistencies between the two reports. Dr. Doss did not address any of the blatant differences with the two consultative examinations. Her opinion was highly speculative, based heavily on the claimant’s reports projected potential limitations, and was not supported by longitudinal data. Therefore, both of Dr. Doss’ reports are given little weight (Ex. 13F,

Get Access