preview

Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary

Good Essays

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s response letter to the aftermath of the events in Birmingham, entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” begs the question: why does non-violent direct action work? The letter is addressed to eight white clergymen who strongly disagreed with King’s untimely decision to exhibit nonviolent direct action during his protests in Birmingham. In his letter he justifies the need for protests and negotiations against the numerous counts of racial injustice. He addresses the criticism over his untimely choice to protest by countering, “For years now I have heard the word ‘Wait!’…We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God-given rights” (King 98-99). He goes on to defend his willingness to break the law. Explaining the difference between just and unjust laws, he justifies his morally and ethically correct decision to pursue non-violent direct action. Reflecting upon biblical and historical illustrations, he cites the unjust laws of Nebuchadnezzar and Hitler as examples that do not coincide with the laws of God and are thus meant to be broken; similar to how he feels about segregation laws. Midway through the letter he begins to shift his focus to expressing his disappointment in certain groups of non-supporters; such as the Christian church and the “white moderate,” someone who demands peace, but neglects justice. He closes the letter by apologizing for its excessive length and overstatement of the truth, but hopes it will promote an

Get Access