What do you think Dr. Martin Luther King’s moral theory was? He states, “We will reach the goal of freedom in Birmingham and all over the nation, because the goal of America is freedom” but what is he moral decree? Perhaps he is a deontologist, a utilitarian, or a virtue ethicist? After reading “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, one may conclude their opinion on what moral action he stood by. Philosophy in moral theory is unique, because it helps draw the line for individuals to understand what actions are morally right or wrong.
We question his moral philosophy. Is he a deontologist? It is important to understand what deontology is before proceeding. Deontology states an idea to ethics that decides if a certain act itself is right or wrong. For example, a deontologist believes that one should never lie, even if a killer asks for a location of his next victim. Act to will your actions to the universal law, just like utilitarianism it is a black or white moral decision guider. He could not have been a deontologist because he is promoting the action of breaking unjust laws if it is for a morally acceptable reason. A deontologist would not promote breaking even unjust laws, because if one breaks an unjust law, then it can lead to everyone breaking laws. No, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was not a deontologist because he does not promote one should act only based on universal law.
Utilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is indefinitely determined by its
In the Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. the author makes multiple allusions to philosophers. His comparison make it seem as if he shares likeness with them. King’s work was highly devoted to one thing only, the protection of civil disobedience so that the civil rights movement could go on uncompromised. Although King only had one purpose the complexity of the situation called for unity by eight Alabama clergymen for a decision. In this way King’s letter served more than the one singular purpose of fighting for civil rights, he used it to establish himself as a credible authority amongst his audience, let the trials of the black in America be shown, and to argue the absolute necessity of immediate action.
Martin Luther King Jr. believed in transcendence, believing we all should be treated fairly and that right and wrong does exist. King’s critics violate non-contradiction, appropriate authority, and equivocation. The oppress gets freedom when they demand it. In Letter from Birmingham Jail, King uses evidence to prove his statements. King believed in just and unjust laws. To King a just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. Unjust laws can be broken if it’s something you believe in and needs to be stood up for, even if that are consequences that go along with your decision. King wanted better for African American and did not want them to suffer from unfair justice any longer. Dr. King was a motivational speaker who supported non-violence actions and believe that no man should fight with their hands but with their words. In Letter from Birmingham Jail, King is not only appealing to Christian Authorities but to other beliefs and religions also. King blames the regular white society instead of the powerful white supremacists because they were the ones that are not doing anything to help the blacks overcome the triumph. The legislator states that it is democratically correct that only the white can vote. The white individuals equivocate the word democratically saying that only whites can vote, when in reality anyone can vote. Just because a person makes a claim about the blacks, does not mean they have all of the credentials to make that direct claim. King refers to the bible and utilizes it in his letter by saying that by doing right and believing in God does not mean that the result will always be in your favor the first time around. King says that even though doing right is not always easy, we should not give up and continue to strive for the success that you
Martin Luther king through his letter “letter from Birmingham jail” he revealed his ethical thought by enunciating real facts furthermore he did not only consider his own viewpoints rather he considered viewpoints of many other people in relation to churches hypocrisy and unjust laws versus just laws. Despite the fact that martin Luther king was in jail, Luther uses ethical thought to critique the ministers by articulating his beliefs and ideas via displaying descriptive and meaningful illustrations of ethics of law and sensible thinking. In his letter king exceptionally introduces his point of view via observation of multiple people by using coherent thinking and more to that having a mentality that is fair minded.
On April 12, 1963 Martin Luther King, Jr. composed one of his most famous letters in a Birmingham jail addressing eight prominent Alabama clergymen. This letter known as The Letter from Birmingham Jail has become one of the most important works in the fields of theology and ethics since its composition. In the following essay, I will attempt to provide a brief illustration of the intellectual landscape that King developed over his short life as well as touch major influential experiences that contributed to King’s ethical and theological developments as seen within this prolific letter. This endeavor is not only to satisfy my own curiosity, but more importantly begin to peer more deeply into this legendary prophet in the hopes that I may be able to apply his own theological understandings the context in which we live.
The reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. was a man of virtues in many aspects, particularly in time that was filled with unnecessary tension and violence. He was one of the most, if not the most prominent, civil rights activist in the nineteen sixties, as well as a devoted man of religion. Often King when addressing the civil issues we once faced, he would make a point to include his religion to assert his point. King felt it was important to include his region into the subjects he cared strongly about. As well as being a reverend and civil rights leader, he was man of intelligence and education. Unlike some of his counter parts that used fear mongering to control the social setting as well as the status quo of the South, King used his logic, education, and critical thinking skills to help form a new Southern United States. He makes a prime example of this in his “Letter form a Birmingham Jail” using classic rhetoric in his letter.
He believed that men and women everywhere, regardless of colour or faith, are equal members of society. Through this belief, he used religion and philosophy to bring attention to the necessity of ending discrimination in not only a peaceful manner, but also without denying, abusing, or violating the civil rights of (anyone/the American people?). The main principles of King’s philosophy of non-violence had been tested frequently and intensely, yet he remained adamant on their application. In his ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail,’ Dr. King described the need for civil disobedience as inevitable, saying that eventually the “pent-up resentments and latent frustrations” (Birmingham Letter) of African Americans would come to the surface; however, instead of these (emotions?) resulting in outbursts of violence and (animosity), King urged for them to be expressed in the way of marches and sit-ins, to demonstrate with as much peacefulness as there was passion. Using these methods produced a type of tension which he explained as “…a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth” (Birmingham
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that seeks to define right and wrong actions based solely on the consequences they produce. By utilitarian standards, an act is determined to be right if and
Martin Luther King Jr. had one major belief. He wanted everyone to be able to live in a world where skin color didn’t matter. Of equal importance, he believed we should be able to treat each other like brothers and sisters because we were all human under God’s eyes. He used nonviolence and peaceful protests to express his beliefs, which were inspired by Gandhi. For example, King led the 1955 Montgomery Bus Boycott, helped organize the 1963 nonviolent protests in Birmingham,
It is impossible to separate the sage 's life from his or her Philosophical beliefs, it is also impossible to separate the public philosophical advocate from their place in history. Martin Luther brought important philosophical and moral concerns into the public arena. King belongs to a special of classes of activist philosophical whose philosophical and lives are inseparable because his chief concerns were social progress and improvement, Dr. King 's powerful speaking skills combined with his courageous actions on behalf of racial justice, makes him a compelling exemplar of philosophical advocacy in action. Dr. King is widely regarded as America 's pre-eminent advocate of nonviolence and one of the greatest nonviolent leaders in world
Martin Luther King Jr.’s central philosophy was to promote change through peaceful protests. This follows the ideas of the transcendental movement because it centered around doing good for others. However, King’s views differed a bit from conventional transcendentalist thoughts because King brought religion into his methods. Typically, transcendentalists separated their beliefs from religion, while Martin Luther King Jr. based his teachings on his Christian views.
2 values that Martin Luther king Jr felt that worth giving his life for were freedom and faith. Martin Luther king, Jr was arrested and sent to jail in Birmingham because he protested treatment of blacks against political demonstrations. He then published a letter in a newspaper declaring demonstrations for justice with his faith. He wrote that everyone has a right to break unjust laws and encouraged people to confront issues and put into practice rather than watching it from far away. He explained every details the reason of what he is doing and why he does this movement. He also focused on “nonviolent direct action” not “direct action”. He did not want people to fight each other violently based on Matthew 5:38-39 “you have heard that it
Before, understanding these principles the term utilitarianism should be defined. Utilitarianism is the idea that one believes whether doing something good or bad morally depends on the effects of an action in maximizing utility. These people are called
King commented on nonviolence by saying, “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral.” This quote shows how Martin Luther King was against nonviolence as he says it is immoral.This philosophy gives advice on how to live nonviolently, similar to how Thoreau would give his readers advice on how to become one with nature. Martin Luther King’s final idea was practicing nonviolent protest in order to achieve a goal or reform. King, with many other people, in the 1950s and 1960s practiced nonviolent protest in order to achieve his goal of ending segregations, and believes equal rights for blacks across the United States. Martin Luther King’s practice of nonviolence is directly borrowed from Thoreau 's work of Civil Disobedience and Nonviolent Resistance, King even commented on the use of nonviolence by saying, “The teachings of Thoreau came alive in our civil rights movement.” In conclusion, Martin Luther King can be considered a transcendental thinker due to the philosophies he created, the Triple Evil philosophy and Six Principles of Nonviolence philosophy, as well as his practice of nonviolence.
The theory of Utilitarianism states that actions should be judged as right or wrong depending on whether they cause more happiness or unhappiness. It weighs the rightness and wrongness of an action based on consequences of that action.
Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain.