preview

Martha Stewart Case Summary

Decent Essays

Were Martha Stewart and JC Penney stores responsible of breaching of contract with Macy’s original deal about selling exclusive products of Martha Stewart’s brand in their stores?
Rules
A breach of contract means that one or more of the terms and obligations written in a deal has not been fulfilled. When one or more of the parties involved in the deal do not comply with the agreements in the contract, it is considered breach a contract. They have the rights to take legal action and claims for compensations or damages in a court. Breach of contract includes failing to perform as promised, making it impossible for the other party to perform as promised, or making it known there is an intention not to perform (When Can You Sue for Breach of Contract?, …show more content…

The first question is what the obligations are for each party. Macy’s had the rights to sell exclusive products of Martha Stewart, and she would supply Macy’s with her products creating a share of sales between the two parties. The next question is that a contract existed. They signed an agreement in 2006 staying all the conditions. If there was any modification or changes in the contract about the sale of the exclusive products, there would not be altercations between other parties. There will be monetary damages for Macy’s because it will not have exclusive products anymore, so other people can go to JC Penney’s stores and buy the same product even at a lower price. With all of this information collected, I can assume that Martha Stewart breached the contract with Macy’s. Martha Stewart had an agreement with Macy’s to sell exclusive products of her brand, and then she signed a different contract with JC Penney to sell products of her brand too while the original contract was still in process. It is evident that if I have the rights to sell exclusive products and my supplier agreed with me in a contract, I will not expect that other stores will sell the same products. Martha Stewart and JC Penney did not act correctly and broke the original contract, so the jury will be able to make the best remedy and solution for the affected party, in this case

Get Access