Marie Antoinette, a young and hated queen, ruled France in the beginning of the French Revolution. There has been many books, articles, documentaries, and movies that interpret Marie Antoinette’s life. An example of a movie is the 2006 Hollywood drama Marie Antoinette, starring Kirsten Dunst. What many people wonder is if the movies, books, and documentaries stay along with what really happened in history. After watching the Hollywood movie and reading books about Marie Antoinette, someone can conclude that the movie stuck with true, historical events most of the duration of the movie but, in some places of the movie, the events that were shown were untrue. To get understanding of the movie, you have to look back and see what events were happening …show more content…
For example, the marriage between Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI was solely to ensure a political alliance between the countries of France and Austria was highlighted in the beginning of the movie. Also, the movie highlighted the hatred and suspicion between the population of France and Marie. During Marie’s stay, both the movie and historical events touched on Marie’s disdain and lack of knowledge on French etiquette and customs at the palace. When the movie showed Marie singing, they interpreted it show the musical talent Marie has due to the way she was educated. Another key example of the similarities between the movie and historical events was the pressure everyone was giving Marie to produce an heir. Everyone was getting suspicious and mad at the lack of heirs so late in a marriage. Another true fact that was both in the movie and in history was Marie’s affair with the Swedish Count Axel von Fersen. It is not said in the movie but Marie did have two illegitimate children with the Swedish Count. The movie was also correct when they added the death of King Louis XV from smallpox. The movie was correct when they added the French help in the American Revolutionary War. Louis first was against the idea, but his advisors convinced him to send funds to America to show the strength of France. The movie was also correct when saying that Marie’s first child was a girl named Marie Therese after her …show more content…
For example, Marie and King Louis did not first meet in the woods. Historians couldn’t find evidence of the letters Maria Theresa sent to Marie, pressuring her to seduce King Louis XVI. When the mob came to the Palace of Versailles, only women were there, the movie showed both men and women. The movie also didn’t mention that Marie fled the palace disguised at Madame de Tourzel’s chambermaid. The king being discovered during his escape and the family having to turn back was not mentioned in the movie. Both Marie and Louis XVI were executed by the guillotine. Marie’s execution is known as one of the most famous events in the French Revolution was not mentioned in the movie either. These were a few prime examples of the Hollywood movie productions adding and subtracting vital information to movies so that the movie can pass in the box
James J. Braddock was a legend in his time. From getting kicked out of the rink during the depression to getting back on his feet in the end. When the depression hit, his boxing career hit a low. After losing 16 out of 22 matches during which he shattered his right hand, he decide to call it and joined the government relief line. He joined the relief line to support his wife and children. During this time he finds work on the docks for a few dollars and due to his shattered right hand he is forced to use his left hand.
Patrick A. Lespinasse is the Director, State Government Affairs at Verizon. He is responsible for strategic advocacy on a broad range of public policy, legislative and regulatory issues that impact corporations on the local, municipal and state levels. Lespiansse is a lawyer, adjust professor at St. John's University, and former staffer to Assemblyman Thomas
Antoinette was materialistic and financially irresponsible whilst positioned as the Queen of France. Marie Antoinette was
As queen of France, Marie Antoinette was a symbol of what the common French peasant hated of the aristocracy. She often had a cold disinterest in the common people, however being warm and outgoing to fellow noble aristocrats. Generally liked at first, she turned into the very thing commoners hated of the aristocracy. Through her years, her actions as queen, what she did during times of unrest and turmoil in France, and simply how the people viewed her attributed to her becoming of a villain to the peasants.
that were brought to my attention that the average movie watcher may or may not have
1) Source 1 is revealed to be a personal letter to Marie Antoinette from her mother, the Archduchess of Austria. It explicitly states that after the dismissal of two ministers, the general public no longer praise the current queen. Marie Antoinette's’ mother is well aware that her daughter does not apply herself, although, the letter does reveal that rumours within France about the queen have begun to circulate outside of the country, “....I hear of nothing but racing and hunting, and always without the king …” Source 2 is a French satirical cartoon depicting a peasant from the Third Estate bearing the weight of the nobility and having minimal help from the from the clergy. The image and the translation around the image reveals the current
The story of revolution and resistance in 18th-century France is a complicated one, and no two historians tell the story the same way. However, it is clear that for the revolutionaries, Marie Antoinette’s significance was mainly, powerfully symbolic. "She and the people around her seemed to represent everything that was wrong with the monarchy and the Second Estate: They appeared to be tone-deaf, out of touch, disloyal (along with her allegedly treasonous behavior, writers and pamphleteers frequently accused the queen of adultery) and self-interested"( Moore 17 ). What Marie Antoinette was actually like was beside the point; the image of the queen was far more influential than the woman herself.
The people of France decided to create many rumors about her because she was not French, and a lot of the gossip was horrible. Marie Antoinette was definitely embarrassed by all the scandalous rumors and for her part in the Diamond Necklace Affair , 1785. The Diamond Necklace Affair was based upon how the French citizens believed that Antoinette was involved in the crime of theft of jewelry and many were outraged about it. The events of this Affair helped lead to important events that took place during the French
Marie Antoinette was the queen of France and could be seen as a controversial figure. She grew up in Austria and later moved to France, causing an outrage since she was an outsider.. Many events were blamed on her which had a huge impact on France. Many opposed her due to her poor leadership skills and lack of interest in the people. Marie Antoinette, along with her husband Louis XVI, came into power at a difficult time. France was in debt and revolutions were rising. Unfortunately, Marie Antoinette lacked the leadership and confidence necessary to rule. The time period of her rule was during the Enlightenment in the late 1700’s. Marie Antoinette was later executed in the guillotine for being found guilty of treason. Marie Antoinette, the queen of France, greatly impacted the history of Western Civilization by her excessive spending, her incompetence to rule, and her flight to Varennes.
participated in the scandal they accused her of: the scandal that led to her death by guillotine: the Affair of the Diamond Necklace. Marie Antoinette was also blamed for The French Revolution and the suffering of the poor people, but the citizens of France were already poor long before she became queen. The French Revolution was a time of political and social disruption, and the change of their absolute monarchy. Marie Antoinette was part of the monarchy, so she was disliked, but she was not the cause of The French Revolution. Her husband, King Louis XVI, made known
Marie Antoinette was married at the age of 15 and became queen at the age of 19. She loved spending money on pointless things even though France was suffering from bad harvests and high taxes. The people grew to despise her and said terrible things about her. They blamed her for everything even though it wasn’t her fault and in the peoples rage, they started the French Revolution. After that,
A key event that happened during the French Revolution that really affected France was the “Woman Marching on Versailles.” This event took place on October 5th, 1789. Before this you have to understand that these women were poor and had no money to buy bread for their children. Without food for them and their kids would die. Marie Antoinette, the queen at this time was living in her castle surrounded by luxuries, food, and money. She was completely oblivious to the fact that many people were dying while she was living her life in her castle not helping the starving people.
I think Bollaín chose to make a film about a film to show how important the history actually is to the people of these countries. There were many scenes where she chose to show characters wanting to portray things exactly how they happened historically. For example,
In the late 1700’s, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, two of the most unliked rulers of Paris had somewhat important role during the French Revolution. King Louis was not prepared for the task and his wife Marie Antoinette was not much help.
What critics fail to recognize is that the anachronism modernizes the film to reflect the values of society today. Coppola’s willful ignorance of accurate history allows the audience to emphasize with a victimized portrayal of Marie Antoinette. As a naïve wild child stuck in a state of loneliness, Coppola highlights themes of individualism and self-identity to create a relatable coming of age story out of a notorious historical figure. Coming of age stories have been popular within past four decades because of their “[link]… to identity development” that society values (Lewis). Camera angles, music, and anachronism form an intimate experience created in order for the audience to form a connection with Marie Antoinette. Sofia Coppola’s choice to humanize Marie Antoinette expands on the idea that society overlooks and allows corruption taking place in society. There are people that we give the “Coppola effect” of neglecting the harsh truth of reality. The real Queen of France shares some of the same values of famous figures today: extravagance and rebellion. The fact of the matter is if we as a society continue neglecting the truth, these immoral values will continue to be reflected in our culture and won’t be trumped by