Journal on The Manufacture of Consent
In Noam Chomsky's film I have learned quite a few things about life in a
democratic society. This film has made think in a three dimensional way for whom is
really right, Noam Chomsky or those who he calls "Elites". I have come to the
conclusion that Noam Chomsky is right, for his claim is very convincing which is
that the media is controlled by the elites who determine what the public should
know. How exactly does Chomsky prove all this to make sense? Well, he
explained that the governments, corporations and the other elites manufacture the
consent of the public to serve their own interests.
…show more content…
This is why the average
Joe will let the elites control on what they hear and how they will be controlled
through brainwashing.
Another thing I would like to talk about is that Noam Chomsky is a type of
person who wont let nothing get in his way, for example: It was said that he risked
his career and life for the sake of other people. This is one of the reasons why I
would respect him. He could have put his whole family down the drain, but
somehow he came out on top. I could tell he was a man who is not only itelligent,
but also a man of great courage and caring for those in need, like those of East
Timur. If it wasnt for him, I would bet that more than half the class would of
never heard about what was going on in East Timur. The reason why I believe he
made film was that he wanted to help the people of East Timur or else he wouldn't
have put it on the film. He wanted the viewers to see the tragedy of East Timur,
for he believed that the only way to work out problems was from the outside and
this I think, he meant us the viewers to spread the word for we are a democratic
society and we control the government and not the government control us.
For the final reason why I
of the people in his city and he becomes loved. He did a great deed for his people, and he felt very gratifying about it. Although this played a role in his personality
I have always modeled myself after this outstanding man, thane, husband and friend. His courage was infinite and his love was boundless. Many may say he was nothing more than a traitor to his
With all the topics to choose from I chose, “ Should scientist be required to obtain a patient’s consent when they use the patient’s tissue for medical research?”. The reason I chose that topic was because when I was going through the options I kept coming back to this one. I kept coming back because consent is an important part in the field I wish to go into.
strives for excellence and individual glory by doing heroic deeds. He has an admirable set of
Manufacturing Consent is a technique of control. Noam Chomsky was first introduced to this concept from an author named Walter Lippmann who wrote about ‘Manufacturer of Consent.’ Chomsky augmented his concept to Manufacturing Concept and the philosophy has become so popular it later became a documentary film produced by two Canadians. Noam Chomsky has been called ‘arguably the greatest intellectual alive' (Fox, 1998) by the New York Times as he not only is a very outspoken professor, he is also an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, logician, historian, political critic and activist. The information in this essay was obtained from his video called:
his mind for anything or anyone, which prevents him from being able to know how
which is his hero because how he was towards his country giving money to the poor ,
Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering informed
According to the theories presented in Marc Achbar and Peter Wintonick's thought provoking documentary "Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media," if the ideas in this reaction paper were to be published as a review piece for The Collegian, much of what I would say may well be censored. On the other hand, an even worse case scenario would be that my ideas would be regarded as irrelevant because the students of Penn State have been systematically numbed into apathy by the mind-control tactics of the "establishment" mass media and their corporate interests.
accepts the quest in order to get his land back and sets off with a
Why did this person do virtuous things to aid his people? I’ve heard myths of that person. He was hard working and knew what it means to be a leader. He was willing to die for want he believed in and who he protected. This person had influence that expands out from the populous cities to the wilderness.
made many mistakes when he was young, he later use all his power to benefit the society and also
made each small point of his persuasion very easy to accept and as logical as possible so none of the rest could easily object to it
methods, he inspired his students to be themselves and act like individuals. He teaches them to
There are many ways to give back to your community, by donating your time, money, or in some cases biological material. Throughout the developments of medical history, there have been countless test subjects and donors that have played a role in medical advancements. It was not until the mid-1900’s that anyone started really investigating how medical researcher obtained their materials thus their unethical practices were discovered. Doctors took patient’s samples for research as “payment” for the treatment without asking for consent. It has been proposed that everyone should donate tissue samples out of obligation to allow scientist the chance to make further advancements, and the patients will be compensated based on how significant the breakthrough is. David Korn, vice provost for research at Harvard University quotes, “I think people are morally obligated to allow their bits and pieces to be used to advance knowledge to help others. Since everybody benefits, everybody can accept the small risks of having their tissue scraps used in research.” (Korn) Whether donating samples makes critical advances in the medical field or not, no biological samples should be taken from a person’s body without their consent.