From figure 5 and figure 6 we can infer that Singapore has most volatile GDP per capita and GDP per capita growth rate whereas Indonesia has most stable GDP per capita and GDP per capita growth rate which are unaffected by global economic recession and other global economic factors. Figure 5. GDP per capita from 2007 to 2015 Figure 6. GDP per capita growth rate from 2007 to 2015 4. Income Inequality Figure 7. Income inequality trend From the figure 7, we can infer that Indonesia has lowest Income inequality, but in the recent few years, the seems to be increasing. Malaysia has high income inequality but it is having a decreasing trend. Singapore’s income inequality trend is almost at the same level. In the year 2015 the income inequality of all the three countries has become almost equal i.e. ~ 41%. Based on the above done analysis of 3 countries i.e. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore we can find that • Indonesia is the most populated country among the three countries • Indonesia’s and Malaysia’s population growth trend is almost constant, it is not decreasing too fast like Singapore. • Indonesia’s and Malaysia’s population distribution is triangular shaped unlike Singapore’s population distribution which has less population in the age group 0 – 20 years. Singapore will have more aged people in the near future. • Indonesia’s GDP increased rapidly increased in the period 2008 to 2010, whereas, Malaysia’s and Singapore’s GDP are at the same level. • Malaysia’s and
Furthermore Australia’s largest sector is in services whereas Indonesia’s is in industry. This could reflect the lack of tertiary education available in Indonesia as the workers will mainly be unskilled or low skilled. The GDP per capita is also drastically different and this would represent the average income in each economy, hence also reflecting the quality of life experienced.
The issue of income inequality in the United States is complicated and does not have a definite answer. Income inequality can be measured in a few different ways. The first measurement for the income inequality in a country is to look at the percentages on households and group them into income categories, called distribution by income category. The second measurement for income inequality is called distribution by quintiles or fifths. This is when you divide the total number of people, households, families into five groups called quintiles to examine the percentage of total before tax income received by each quintile. Each quintile would then be ordered by income and households in the category.
Why are Some Nations Rich and Others Poor? Introduction Over the years, a nation’s economy will change drastically and, due to a large variety of factors, there are now countries who are significantly wealthier than others. These factors range from lack of education, to lack of natural resources and all of them notably effect the economy of a country.
Malaysia’s GDP Annual Growth Rate since 2000 till present. Notice the sharp contraction after the 2008 Financial Crises.
By observation of the last 2 decades, Netherlands has an averaged GDP growth of 0.53% between 1988 and 2015, all time high: 1.80% (Q1 1999) and all time low: -3.30% (Q1 2009).
Japan has a HDI rank of 17th determined by its $US 36,332 GDP per capita whereas Australia’s HDI rank is 2nd and has a GDP per capita of $US 61,219. These rankings and GDPs are determined by Japans 0.933 HDI, 83.6 age life expectancy and 11.5 mean years of education. Australia’s ranking and GDP are determined by its 0.890 HDI, 82.5 age life expectancy and 12.8 mean years of education.
Recently, studies have shown that income inequality has many connections that have caused the gap in the United States. According to the research I found, income inequality is connected to corruption, trade, wages of workers, and education. The world income inequality had declined since the twentieth century according to the studies found (Clark). Corruption falls increasing on low income individuals more than higher income individuals. Additionally, the trade theory suggests that the free trade might have level up the income inequality higher within countries by the different patterns of wages and demand for workers who are skilled and unskilled (Silva and Leichenko). Moreover, the education of wealthier people has it easier because the
There are many challenges in comparing data between economies, or in a single economy in different years. Examples of challenges include:
in terms of income inequality. It is the huge fact that income inequality is higher in Mexico than the U.S. The graphs also support this reality. According to the income inequality graph of Mexico, income inequality is much higher in 1989 in Mexico because the gini index is 54,34% so it is the closest point to 100% in the graph. The income inequality graph of Mexico has fluctuating trend until 2006. After that, the trend goes stable. The lowest income inequality for Mexico happens in 2004 according to the gini index which is 46,05%. This percentage is the furthest from 100%. As for the U.S., looking at the income inequality graph of the U.S., the closest point to 100% of this graph is 41,75% in 2007. One of the reason of this increasing of income inequality may be the financial crisis of 2008. On the other hand, the lowest income inequality for the U.S. occurs in 1986 with 37,33% gini
Income inequality is universally known as the divide in acquisition of wealth between the elites of the world and the poorest of the world. As far as developed nations go across the world, the United States holds most of the differences between the rich and the poor. Ray Williams outlines in his paper that “the richest 20 percent of American society [control] about 84 percent of the country’s wealth” which is a huge abundance of wealth to be held by such a small percent of citizens in one country
The statement were proved based on the ETP initiated by Government basically the foundation of the National Key Results Areas (NKEA) made from various research on identifying the areas that can be developed in Malaysia by looking at developed countries. In order to make sure everything succeed by boost up our economic growth, Government need to do spending whereby rm1.4 trillion in investment to generate a GNI of rm1.7 trillion.
The Republic of Singapore celebrated its 42 years of independence in year 2007. Situated at the southern tip of Malaysia, Singapore currently holds a population of 4.68 million as of June 2007. At 704.0km2, it is ranked 4th in the world for its population density. During the past four decades, the economy as measured by real Gross Domestic Product (GDP), multiplied by over 20 times (Ghesquiere, 2007, p.11). As a small and extremely open economy, Singapore long term survival is very much dependent on the ability to maintain its viable position and remain afloat in the sea of global competition (Mun Heng et al, 1998, p.14).
Continuous rapid economic growth has raised Malaysia from an agricultural and commodity-based low-income economy to a successful middle-income economy. As a mixed economy, Malaysia has elements of a free market economy nevertheless with intervention government. Malaysia's economic activity consist of a mixture of sectors whereas mixed of capitalism and socialism The strong economic performance has helped improve the quality of life for Malaysians and supported advances in education, health, infrastructure, housing and public amenities and others.
The crisis spread to many neighbouring countries such as Indonesia and Philippines who were believed to have similar unstable economic situations. Although Singapore did not demonstrate similar economic situations such as current account deficits, Singapore 's geographical proximity with its neighbouring countries and economic dependence resulted in Singapore being hit by the crisis too. Evidence of current account surplus in Singapore is shown in Table 1. The current account balance to GDP ratio of Singapore was a 15.7% surplus in 1997, as compared to most of the other crisis-affected countries which experienced deficits.
Concerning Singapore and Japan, both countries are developed. But their immigration admissions are different, which may result in different perceptions and impacts. According to a report from The Economist Intelligence Unit, regarding of democracy countries ranking list in 2012, Japan had a high score 8.08, in the 20th position of 167 countries. Singapore ranked at number 75. (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2013) In 2013,The International Monetary Fund estimated Singapore’s GDP was $78,762 per capita, and Japan had $36,208 per capita.(World Economic Outlook Database, 2014, ) Both countries obtain high democracy and economy level, but their net migration rates are totally different. The World Factbook found out that Singapore permits around 14.55 migrants per 1000 population but Japan was closely to 0.00. (World Factbook, 2012) In the past decades, Singapore encouraged foreigners to immigrate that affected nearly 5.5 million people move into Singapore. In 2009, an estimated 40% of foreigner residents are in Singapore who contributed up to 80% of the construction industry and 50% of the service industry. The immigrants play a significant role for Singapore development especially the rapid growth of the GDP. (World Factbook, 2012) There is a statistic project that predicts the population of Japan will drop to 95 million by 2025. (Statistics Bureau, 2014) In 2002, there was