I think that MSL did breach the contract with Macy’s. First, their contract was an exclusive agreement, which implies that only Macy’s had tot sole obligation to sell those products apart from MSL and its related conglomerate. This means that at no one time, as long as the contract held, would MSL engage another party in partnership or joint venture, to sell products prescribed under the contract. When MSL decided to get into another contract with JC Penney (JCP) it would be expected that the agreement would diverge from what the other contract had exclusive rights. In the case study, out of the 2500 designs presented to JCP, about 900 fell into categories restricted under the Macy’s exclusive agreement. Hence, MSL was in breach of Macy’s …show more content…
Thus, the following remedies are proposed to deal with the situation. First, MSL and Macy’s must come together in the presence of their legal experts to mend their differences. Although, it is not clear from the cases whether MSL decided to breach the case out of ignorance or out of gluttony, it is nonetheless critical that both parties hold a joint session. Mending strings will enable both parties to sit down and review the scope of their contracts. It appears from Macke (n. pag.) that Macy’s does not seem to let bygones be bygones, which shows that MSL and Macy’s need to sit down and urgently resolve their differences. The second remedy is to review the scope of their contract. Since the main source of disagreement and lawsuits was misinterpretation of the exclusivity contract, it is important that both parties review their contract. This includes legal practitioners clarifying on the scope of application of the contract. Clarifications on various definition of terminologies used in the contract is important at this stage to ensure that both parties have a common understanding of these terms and their legal implications (Herships n. pag.). Thirdly, MSL needs to revise the new contract with JCP to eliminate products or designs that are included in the exclusive contract with Macy’s. Any future contract that MSL may intend to make must align with its contract with Macy’s as long as the contract holds. Rectification of other contracts will be an indication that MSL
this case could be an tricky in the court, because in the contract they only
a. Macy’s, Inc. is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods. Macy's’ competitors include other middle priced-ranged department stores including Nordstrom, Bed Bath & Beyond, Belk, Bon Ton, Burlington Coat Factory, Dillard’s, Gap, J.C. Penney, Kohl’s, Limited, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks, Sears, Target, TJ Maxx and Wal-Mart. p. 4, 10-K
b. Lancers merchandise was limited before the contract, but now with mass production through the department store they will be able to fully compete with competitors in the market. The company would no longer have to worry about the scarcity of authentic artifacts because they would be mass producing.
The industry we have chosen is the department store-retail industry. Within this industry, we have chosen the department stores of JCPenney and Macy’s. We find this industry, as well as these two companies, interesting from a strategic perspective. JCPenney has recently undergone a massive strategic restructuring in regards to its pricing, brand offerings, and store layout, pushing it away from the typical department store strategy of discounts and coupons. Its new strategy has become much closer to Wal-Mart’s strategy of every day low prices. Macy’s, on the other hand, has restructured with a push from the economic
Cons – The contract with the department store would increase annual revenue by $4m and from Lancer’s current sales number this is a number that cannot be ignored. The company would continue with decreasing sales and profits if they do not
Macy Inc. (M) has a cost structure that can best be viewed using SWOT analysis, which is a way of evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the corporation. Macy’s strengths include customer loyalty, a recognizable store name, use of technology, a substantial supply chain, its comprehensive size, and the locations of its stores. In total, these strengths enable Macy Inc. to provide a unique service that offers a characteristic their competitors do not have: merchandise tailored to the customer by store and climate zone. Macy’s main weakness is its cost structure: costs are high compared to their competitors due to a complete operational transformation that includes localizing merchandise by
The intensity of rivalry and the threat of substitutes are strong components for J.C. Penney to consider as they continue to strive for increased revenue and market share. Their two primary competitors are Macy’s and Kohl’s, both of whom have fiercely competitive strategies to be strong retail operations. For instance, while Macy’s offers a multitude of promotional deals and is working hard to choose products based upon demographics and geographic segmentation, Kohl’s is attempting to reduce their inventory levels and improve their marketing strategies in order to become a stronger competitor in the department store segment of the retail industry. In order to compete with their competitors, J.C. Penney aims to focus on their previously successful promotions and home department segmentations by bringing in new reputable designers in order to attract a larger customer base. Due to the fact that the intensity of rivalry and threat of substitutes are both moderately strong in the retail department store industry, J.C. Penney ought to be diligent in their implementation of strategies in order to achieve success in the retail business.
Another level of weakness that exists currently at Macy’s end is the number of legal issues and proceedings associated with the company. These legal issues can impose serious trouble on the company’s goodwill and profitability (USSEC, 2010).
The financial data will support the strategy as the ratios and numbers show that Macy’s has resources and capital available for the implementation. Evaluation of external and internal factors positively presenting an opportunity for Macy’s to use designed strategy to and keep competitiveness in the industry. Summarizing Macy’s is a well-established organization with over 150 successful years in business that still has an ability to compete with leaders in the industry if the right
Unlike Starbucks, Macy’s is not doing very well, as evidenced by the fact they announced last month the impeding closure of 68 stores (Peterson, 2017). The company has been struggling for a few years with the growth of the internet and online businesses such as Amazon making their brick and mortar stores impractical in modern times. While the number of stores may not seem like as much of a problem as it is, as other companies have had to close down more in recent years or go out of business in general, this is a symptom of larger problems in both the company and the industry.
Macy's Inc. is one of the nation's largest and well known department store chains. Started over 150 years ago, Macy's has continually generated excellent returns for its shareholders and employees. Currently, in the midst of a global recession, Macy's has generated huge profits with same store sales increasing 5.3% year to date. In 2012 same store sales increased 4.6% in the month of February alone (Macy's Inc., 2012). In fact, throughout the duration of 2012, Macy's is projecting even larger profits for its underlying business operations. Even though Macy's has experienced success with both its assortments and brand, its competitors haven't faired so well. Sears, due in part to part to a lackluster holiday season, has been forced to close nearly 120 locations to generate excess liquidity in an effort to shore up its balance sheet (Isidore, 2011).Other competitors who cater specifically to the middle class consumer have also lost significant amounts of market share as consumers trade down due to the economy. This performance is primarily due to the core functions and operations of the business. Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Macy's excels at these forms of management, which has allowed the company to perform at a higher level relative to its peers in the industry.
In this paper I will discuss Macy’s Incorporated by analyzing their business level strategies to determine which I think is the most important to their long term success and if I think it is a good choice. I will analyze their corporate level strategies to determine which I think is the most important and whether or not I believe it is a good choice. I will analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporations’ most significant competitor and compare the two companies’ strategies at each level and evaluate which company I think is most likely to succeed in the long term. Once the
Let’s begin with a definition of common law which is applied to all corporations. “Common law is made and
statement of fact when it is made by one who knows best as it carries
Macy’s Inc. is one of the oldest enterprises in the United States, belonging to the department stores industry. (Hoovers.com) It is a national brand, owning 850 department stores. During the development of the company, there had several key decisions that were beneficial for the company. However, in recent years, the competitions in department stores industry become more and more serious.