Lord of the Flies Reader’s Response #1 In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, there are many instances of civilization and savagery. Most predominantly, an intense moment where “a thing crawlies out of the forest… and already its blood was staining the sand,” savagery is portrayed (152). Although flashes of savagery are illustrated before this point in the novel, this is the most intense and shocking moment yet. Simon is killed. The boys commit murder. Although Ralph and Piggy aren’t directly involved, they remain captivated by the savagery of the moment. Savagery is strongly conveyed through the characters at this shocking moment in the novel. There are several symbols portrayed when Simon is killed. First, Simon is mistaken for the Beast, …show more content…
He sees the good in everyone, the protector of the littluns, and enjoys the nature around him. He is the good spirit in the novel, neither representing civilization or savagery, but peace and unity. He was wrong killed by savagery in this intense moment, his “blood… staining the sand,” (152). Simon also represents wisdom. He sees what’s happening to the boys and is killed because the boys didn’t want to recognize the truth. To further explain, the conversation with the Lord of the Flies was in Simon’s head, so deep down, he knew something really bad was going to happen. The Beast says, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt or kill! … You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close. I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are what they are?" (206). He couldn’t have known that if he didn’t have the wisdom of something uncanny and supernatural. Simon is a symbol of peace, goodness, and truth in Lord of the …show more content…
Jack and the rest of the boys went completely savage after Simon is killed. It is the first moment the boys do something so insane and shocking. They kill someone… someone they know… someone they are friends with. To reach that point of insanity proves the boys change for the rest of the novel. Even Ralph and Piggy are affected. Flashes of savagery within Ralph reveal during the killing of Simon, contributing to the reader’s understanding of Ralph as a character. Furthermore, Ralph feels guilty, and Piggy is in denial, “gesticulating, searching for a formula” (224). Ralph confesses it was murder and Piggy counters, “We was scared! Anything might have happened. It wasn’t—what you said” (224). Piggy is usually so matter-of-fact and intellectual, and to see him twist the truth supports he has changed. As for Jack, he never goes back to any form of civilization on the island. He's changed, his true colors coming out for good. Savagery within Lord of the Flies portrays character development of Ralph, Piggy, Jack, and the other
Simon and Piggy are brutally murdered by the power-hungry savage, Jack Merridew. The island is never the same after their departures. Ralph reflects on how much the island has crumbled when hiding from Jack and his tribe of savages, "The breaking of the conch and the deaths of Piggy and Simon lay over the island like a vapor. These painted savages would go further and further" (Golding, 184). Both Piggy and Simon have such an important role in keeping the balance on the island. Piggy’s character is symbolic for knowledge and reason; Simon’s for faith and religion. Both of these righteous attributes are lost when the boys leave. Ralph loses all his leverage over the naive littluns when Simon and Piggy pass away. They join Jack’s silly tribe which leaves Ralph outnumbered and ideologically alone. Because of their departure, the basic principles of civilized life are forgotten and beastly savages take over the island. Shakespeare and Golding both emphasize the influence that characters have on the plot of the story. As soon as a significant character is taken away or changed in some way, the environment is reshaped either for better or for worse. The deaths of King Duncan, Simon, and Piggy in Macbeth and Lord of the Flies create consequences that gravely affect other characters, such as Macbeth and Ralph.
The character Ralph is introduced , explained developed over the course of the of the text it reveals his attitude. At this point now in the novel “Lord of the Flies” Ralph confronts Jack which starts a fight for authority, he says that Jack is a beast, confirming what Simon learned earlier, that the beast is inside us. He also keeps accusing Jack of stealing stuff,although this accusation means nothing in the absence of civilization. Then in the novel it states ,”By him stood Piggy still holding out the talisman, the fragile, shining beauty of the shell. The storm of sound beat at them, an incantation of hatred. High overhead, Roger, with a sense of delirious abandonment, leaned all his weight on the lever.” at this point in the passage, Piggy makes one last attempt to restore order. The conch that once had full of power, is now nothing but an object. Roger prepares to let go a large rock upon the enemies of the tribe. Piggy stands directly in the rock's path and is killed.“We saw your smoke. What have you been doing? Having a war or something?" (207) In the final chapter, Jack sets the jungle on fire to smoke Ralph out of hiding ,Just when Ralph is surrounded by savages on the beach then they are interrupted by the arrival of a naval officer. Jack's act of savagery is the cause of
There is no punishment for their actions, therefore allowing the evil inside of them to come out. Jack and Roger both kill Simon with their savagery behavior, and Roger kills Piggy cause of no one can limit his action, and Jack is responsible for the downfall of the boys. Simon is killed on a dark, stormy night after he find out the truth of the beast. The boys of Jack’s tribe had zero attention to good behavior and moral.
He want to the boys that the beast is not real but it's hard to tell them. The boy were afraid of the beast that shows fear then turns into savagery and the boys killed Simon. In chapter 9 of Lord of the Flies, William Golding employs leadership, fear, and savagery to convey the theme that fear can bring the savage out of you. In chapter 9 Golding used repetition.
Ralph represents order and discipline, while Jack represents an unhealthy drive for power and savagery. In the beginning of the novel, Ralph is voted the leader of the group and attempts to make life on the island disciplined and civilized, like their life in England. However, throughout the novel Jack rivals Ralph’s leadership role, attempting to overthrow him. As the boys’ savage impulses increase, more of them begin to side with Jack instead of going with Ralph. As Ralph loses his hold over the boys, almost all of them begin to act violently and barbaric. An example of this is when the children of the island murder Simon for no justifiable reason. Even Piggy and Ralph partake in the murder, showing that the violent human impulse is in
In a world that demands individuals to conduct themselves according to the values and morals imposed by the society, it is often difficult to find those that exhibit an innate sense of compassion. Simon is a character that proves to be ‘one with nature’ and shows an immediate liking to his new environment. Therefore, when the others resorted to savagery, he still had not lost his gentleness and compassion. His encounter with the Lord of the Flies exposes the truth about the beast and as a result, causes his consciousness to evolve. This reveals his true nature as a kindhearted and an honest person. As promised, the Lord of the Flies did have fun with him, ultimately causing his death in attempts of spreading the truth amongst the other boys. The ‘Lord of the Flies’ states: “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!”
They committed the first murder because they were having a party. Simon comes down from the mountain in the dark to tell everyone that the beast was a dead parachuter, instead of listening to him, they circled him thinking he was the beast and they “screamed, struck, bit, tore”(153). When Golding had the characters murder Simon, it showed to the readers how they were so out of it that they didn't even know it was Simon. The characters also did not hear Simon explaining the beast to them because they were all screaming and out of control. The boys also ended up killing Piggy, they got in an argument and pushed a boulder down and it “struck Piggy with a glancing blow [...] Piggy fell forty feet and landed on his back across the square red rock in the sea. His head opened and red stuff came out”(181).this happened over the glasses. Piggy and Ralph went to castle rock to ask for Piggy’s glasses back and Piggy ended up getting murdered just because of a disagreement. The murder shows that just because someone had a different idea, they killed someone, Jack has become a
To begin with, the death of Simon in Lord of the Flies illustrates innate human evil. Simon's death is preceded by Jack's tribe singing a savage chant. They violently murder Simon, mistaking him as the beast. Children's instantaneous instincts drove them to kill Simon. Engaging in an unplanned murder, these children effectively demonstrate that when they relinquish rationale which is a product of civilization, impulses lead them to act savagely. What is also significant in this scene is that Ralph and Piggy, the two characters mainly portrayed as being rational, join the cruel murder and even begin to express instinctive behavior from their inner self. It is irrational for any person and especially children, to commit murder. Therefore,
As stated by Harold Bloom “He breaks out of the circle, but the hunters chase after him and are out of control, forcing Simon into the role of beast” (Bloom 43). The corrupt boys view Simon crawling out of the forest as “the beast” that they have been fearing. The boys, blind to the truth, murder Simon believing he is some monster when the true monsters are the boys themselves. The boys that cause Simon’s death are little more than savages.
In the book, Simon says to himself, "Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you." Golding 143. This also shows the evil in Simon due to the Lord of the Flies being him.
When Simon died in Lord of the Flies by William Golding, his role as a righteous and pure boy untainted by barbarity perished alongside his body. He embodied the innocence and naivety of the modern civilization and symbolized the boys before they mutated into savages, influenced by the lack of regulation and jurisdiction. However, one can argue that his passing was not a major turning point in the novel because the power dynamic between all the boys remains the same as Piggy continues to be neglected and Jack goes on gaining authority. While it may seem like nothing changes, Simon’s murder allows Jack to display his superiority and brings out the violent and uncontrollable nature within all the boys. As a result, since Jack’s philosophy of
But Piggy, for all his ludicrous body, had brains” (Golding, 69). During this chapter, Ralph begins questioning his leadership, but Piggy tells Ralph that stepping down as chief would allow the boys’ civilization to devolve into chaos and barbarousness. Ralph’s control of the group begins to slip as Jack decides it is no longer in his interest to follow the rules. But when he does this his actions undermines the order and civilization of the group.
Throughout the book, Simon finds a deeper meaning to all things around him and provides information upon the Lord of the Flies but is then ignored and unappreciated. "You shut up, young Simon! Why couldn't you say there wasn’t a beast?" (Golding 93) Simon desperately tries to tell them he doesn’t think the beast is real but more as an imaginary figure of their inner rage, but all he got in the end was being yelled at and disregarded by the group. With his theories, he uses his feelings to produce a reasonable and opinionated judgement to the beastie. In my personality traits, I use feeling to make my decisions based on my emotions along with Simon, going and doing whatever he wants based on what he feels like doing. "However, Simon thought of the beast, there rose before his inward sight the picture of a
The encounter with the Lord of the Flies supports Simon’s thoughts that the beast that the boys are hunting for is not an actual animal. The Lord of the Flies tries to persuade Simon to let go of his rational thoughts and be taken over by his primal instincts in order to have fun like the other boys. However, when Simon’s silence declares that he refuses to let go of logic and rationality, the Lord of the Flies realizes that Simon knows what the beast really is—the innermost part of the boys. Simon seems to make this connection that the Lord of the Flies is representational to the inner beast within the boys almost instantly. “His gaze was held by that ancient, inescapable recognition”(Golding 139). Simon instantly The Lord of the Flies quickly makes the connection, too. “You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are what they are?” (Golding, 1 ). The Lord of the Flies is symbolic to all the evil that is in humans. As Simon realizes that he was right about the beast, he tries to go back to the other boys to warn them about his discovery, but the Lord of the Flies gets angry. “This is ridiculous. You know perfectly well you’ll only meet me down there—so don’t try to
To further illustrate, in “Lord of the Flies” the character, Ralph, is a round and dynamic character. Ralph can be classified as this type of character because of the changes he undergoes as the story unfolds. To explain, at the beginning of the story, Ralph is confident and optimistic when himself and multiple boys crash on an island. He takes control and earns the trust if the group. Ralph conducts assemblies and his words are determined and civilized, “All at once he found he could talk fluently and explain what he had to say… ‘we want to be rescued; and of course, we shall be rescued…we must make a fire”’ (Golding 32-38). Ralph’s words and actions show his boldness to take control and his strong belief in being rescued. However, as the story continues, the system and trust Ralph establish begins to diminish, resulting in two separate groups. The one group contains Ralph and very few civilized boys, and the second group is made up Jack and the savages. Although the groups are at peace at first, multiple fights and Piggy’s stolen glasses causes Ralph to partially change. This change is revealed to the readers when Ralph and Piggy go to the saves to retrieve the glasses, “Truculently they squared up to each other but kept just out of fighting distance… ‘Ralph-remember what we came for. The fire. My specs”’ (Golding 177). During this mission, the once civilized Ralph begins to fight with the savages and he acted barbaric himself. Ralph’s and actions and Piggy’s words show the reader how Ralph transformed the course of the book from being civilized and confident with his word; however, Ralph is now becoming a savage and loses his optimistic attitude. Piggy’s words to Ralph, shows how Ralph is forgetting the idea of being civilized because Piggy must constantly remind Ralph of their mission, but Ralph seems to just want to fight. Ralph’s shift in personality shows the reader that he is a dynamic and round character. Therefore, Ralph’s character undergoes development; however, Brutus in “Julius Ceaser” changes in an equivalent way.