Long Life Research Paper

It is terrifying to realize that the human population on Earth has reached over 7.3 billion people. This astonishing and constantly increasing amount of people threatens our planet’s limited resources. It is times like these that make me nostalgic for the feudal ages, where large populations of people were decimated by illnesses such as the plague. The advances in modern medicine today, while extremely impressive, are ultimately extremely detrimental to the human population as a whole because they surprisingly help prevent people from dying. How dare they! Humans are starting to get a better quality of life due to the many advances in medical technology and knowledge, but at what cost? People won’t die! The question is, why should we, as a society, try to prevent people from dying when it’s inevitable? In the animal kingdom, it’s everyone for themselves, or survival of the fittest. If people are too weak to fight off an illness, or too stupid to find a way to stay alive, then they should die.

the population is said to reach 9 billion by 2050. The overpopulation of humans is causing destructive impacts on the environment and a high demand for resources. One destructive impact would be climate change because of the exceeding rate of humans, causing pollution in the air. While the Earth is having a tough time sustaining particular resources, the high demand causes the earth to force to get its nonrenewable resources. Overpopulation can lead to dangerous impacts of pollution, depleted resources, habitat loss, etc. Overpopulation is a controversial topic. While there are those who are not paying attention to its effects, the world is displaying its resources will soon disappear due to the depletion of nonrenewable resources such as water, oil, and soil. Addressing the problems and concerns of overpopulation now, can help save the lives of individuals in the future, LITERALLY!

In the article that I read, I do not necessarily agree with the goals both Ron Howard and Brian Grazer have in mind for extending the lifespan of human beings. For example, I believe there is a natural reason humans have the average lifespan that they obtain. If we alter that in any way, shape or form, we may cause severe damage to the nature of the Earth. In addition, if we were to expand the life expectancy, there is a high risk that the Earth cannot be handle a much higher population. Too many people would expire the natural goods the planet has. For example, there are many flies in this world, but there life expectancy is one to two weeks. Now, imagine how many flies there would be if there life was extended to a year, or two, or five.

Extended life would be nice for some people, however an healthy life will beat an extended life

For as long as humans have been able to develop societies and inquire about the world, people have been attempting to find ways to prolong life. The early alchemists searched for the ever elusive philosopher’s stone, while the Spanish Conquistadores traveled to distant lands in hopes to find the “Fountain of Youth.” Even today, we continue to search for the “elixir” of life. Currently, researchers are using modern science to find a way to extend our telomeres and allow our cells to regenerate, thus enabling us to live longer. Unfortunately, even with our advancements in science and medicine along with centuries of attempts, human mortality is one thing we haven’t been able to change. No matter how much we try and get rid of that fact of life, it remains a guarantee. Our greatest flaw as

Live forevers (sedum purpureum) are incredibly useful to organisms. The live-forever (sedum purpureum) is a plant native to the continent of Eurasia, and thus could possibly be a dangerous invasive species, which may cause a problem in other natural ecosystems. The live-forever (sedum purpurem) is mostly grown in the northeastern states where it can withstand the harsh temperatures of winter and summer. In this essay i will go further into depth of the biome the life forever is mostly found in, its effect on ecosystems and what it does as an invasive species in the US. we will go further in depth into why the live forever (sedum purpureum) is no longer an invasive species, and how long it has been in the united states.

In “L'Chaim and Its Limits: Why Not Immortality?” and “Decelerating and Arresting Human Aging”, Leon Kass and Walter Glannon are both arguing against life extension, as it will bring no good to our society. Life extension is a technology that would allow a person to extend their lifespan past their expected age of death. In this paper, I will be arguing against life extension, as we will have no motivation to complete our intentions in life when we are given more time to live, and it would also do us no good when it comes to controlling the growing number of retirees when they can take advantage of life extension.

As you may, or may not, know, my birthday is September 28 and I will be turning 16. Some may think I grew up to fast, but for me, it’s been a long time coming. Some highlights of my 16 years being are earth would be: Being a young actress/model, staring in several plays, learning flute and guitar, getting into advanced choir, becoming choir president, receiving my own set at several local events, mantling a 4.0, I waited and hosted several local brunches, volunteer at community events, made it in the top 50 in a county wide talent show, tried out for a Disney princess, mentoring the local youth, Being in an honors level Spanish class, learning French, scoring a perfect 100% on my math CAHSEE, raised over $1,000

What are tax consequences and how can it affect you in the long run? It is said, “taxes are the rice we pay for a civilized society” (Debt.org). What different ways are there to avoid or at least minimize tax consequences? There are some ways to make paying taxes also beneficial.

The justice argument regarding extending the human lifespan looks at the dilemma morally; the moral dilemma being: is it fair for one person to extend their life over another. There is a distinct struggle

In “Is It Unjust to Develop Life Extension if It Will Not Be Possible to Provide It to Everyone?”, John Davis argues on the fact on whether or not we should develop life extension if it won’t bet fairly distributed amongst our society. Davis believes that the rich will most likely have access to life extension before the poor, which creates the issue of unequal access to life extension. In this essay, I will be siding with Davis’ argument, as there should be no reason to develop and research life extension if we cannot make it available to everyone at once.

When you look back on your life in 30 years, what would it take for you to consider your life successful? What relationship or accomplishments will be important on this journey?

Medical advances have increased the length of the average life innumerably, by prolonging death, but this involves challenging medical ethics. Keeping a large number of very ill people alive with these medical technologies, there is also a possibility of suffering; discomfort and diminished quality of life.

Today I’m going to expose the less than desirable side of eternal youth, everlasting life, radically longer human life spans, or any other terminology that you'd like to use to describe the event of seeming eternal life, because an essay published in August of 2013 by the Pew Research Center claims biomedical scientists will be able to extend the average american life span to beyond 120 years by 2050 (Liu). which is all good and well, but you really wouldn't want to live that long

Why do you think humans have been so enamored with this quest for remaining eternally young or for prolonging life indefinitely?