preview

Letter From Birmingham Jail

Better Essays

So in 1955, Martin Luther King started the civil rights movement for non-violent protest against the whites for not making blacks not socially equal. Martin had been arrested for these protests and was criticized for his ways of nonviolence. He wrote a letter to white clergymen who criticized him for being “unwise and untimely.” Martin Luther also presented his “I Have a Dream” speech on the Lincoln memorial steps. In this essay, I will compare and contrast critical information of the two passages. The central idea in Martin Luther’s “I Have a Dream” is to give blacks hope in their minds that there will be change. In his speech, Martin says this “Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go …show more content…

famous “Letter From Birmingham Jail.” First I shall show some of the logical appeals that Martin uses to tell the white clergymen, who criticized him for being “untimely and unwise,” why his acts are not “unwise” and “untimely”. The example being this piece of text, “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to whether injustices exist; negotiation, self purification, and direct action,” and this, “We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known.” Martin gives the clergymen his reasons for appearing in such area, and even tells them that Birmingham is “widely known for their brutality.” He uses logical appeal to convince the clergymen as to why he is not “untimely” or “unwise.” Martin is known for his acts on the Civil Rights Movement, and his nonviolent protests. But people, including the clergymen, might ask Martin says “Why direct action? Is negotiations not a better option?” He answers with this, “You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” Martin has given a logical reason as to why direct action is required. He is saying that if negotiations are not enough, then we must act ourselves and present our own bodies to get what we want and need. The last example to show here is this piece of text that Luther shows, “In your statement you assert that our actions, even though peaceful, must be condemned because they precipitate violence. But is this a logical assertion? Isn’t this like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act

Get Access