Question 1 What are the tradeoffs in using Multiples versus DCF analysis? DCF Valuation 1. Forecast revenue for each year for from the firm’s financial data. 2. Select appropriate discount rate based on WACC 3. Discount each cashflow back to it present value 4. Obtain the terminal value through an application of terminal value multiple 5. You add these values together 6. Using this method, Martin calculates the price of Cox’s share to be $54.29 Multiple Valuation: 1. Identify comparable firms that have growth, cashflow and risks similar to those of target firm whose value is in question. 2. Obtain the individual multiple or ratio of the firm’s price to their financial data, such as EBITDA. 3. Average these multiples to …show more content…
What assumptions does this analysis rely on? Overview of Exhibits 2 and 6 • Exhibit 2 shows the financial summary for selected comparable companies. In particular, it shows the first few steps of multiple analysis, the calculation of industry average multiple using comparable firms. • Exhibit 6 shows the target share price, EBIDTA value and various other equity data for Cox. In particular it shows the last few steps of multiple analysis, namely the application of industry average multiple to Cox, in order to arrive at its target price of $50.00 • When combined, the exhibit 2 and 5 demonstrates the complete process of traditional multiple analysis via EBITDA. Assumptions: • This traditional analysis is based upon many assumptions. • For instance, Exhibit 2 shows Selection of firms based on industry. It assumes that these firms have the same growth, risk and return as the target firm. In reality, these fundamental variables differ from firm to firm even in the same industry. Reckless reliance upon this flawed assumption maybe detrimental if an industry has very few firms. The average obtained would contain a lot of errors. • Secondly, there is the definitional assumption. Analysts assume that their definition of EBIDTA is uniform with others. But in reality this is not true! In exhibit 2, Martin defined the multiple to be Implied Cable value + Non Cable Consolidated Assets/adjusted EBIDTA. A different definition may be used in another
The financial returns for the other three properties are shown in the following exhibit (Exhibit 6).
The questions that follow and the article Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings Equity Value Estimates will inform your completion of Milestone Three. An understanding of the models in this assignment will assist you in hypothesizing the incremental impact of a new investment project for the company. The understanding of these models will contribute to your ability to look toward the future when considering the direction of an organization. This activity is worth a total of 75 points. See the distribution of points listed before each question.
As for this case, we decided to address the companies that were 2 most similar in size to MCC and that were most recent since the industry is rapidly evolving, and therefore, valuations are also rapidly changing. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Finally,
{. How many consecutives years the company has been profitable, its current ration and its ROE
3. Using the cash flow indicator and investment valuation ratios, discuss which company is more likely to have satisfied stockholders.
The following case analysis portraits the use of capital asset pricing model to compute the weighted average cost of capital for Marriott and each of its divisions. The flow of events below is following a string of different evaluations, each of which is assessed separately.
1. Which of the comparable companies appears to be a good match to Crocs at the time of the case? Which would be a good match in five years? Use these multiples to provide additional estimates of the value of Crocs (in other words, calculate a value for Crocs using a current multiple and calculate a
If the market value of a stock is lower than its intrinsic value, this stock is defined as “trades at a discount”. To figure out whether AGI stock is traded at a discount to comparable companies, as its management believed, we can simply apply multiple which comes from the average multiple of its comparable companies. Considering fluctuation of future after-tax earnings caused by the change in capital structure, we prefer to use TEV/EBITDA multiple in this case. Amtelecom Group consists of two lines of business which has to been taken into consideration. We separately calculate the value of both companies and their
1. Please conduct a financial ratio analysis using the data in Exhibit 2. How do the results reflect different strategies pursued by the 4 firms?
The most important is Enterprise value/EBIDTA. Helps to estimate the offer of KKR, inc and gives the answer to Question N4. (See the following table)
1. What ratios are MOST important in assessing current and predicting future value creation for Sears? For Wal-Mart?
A vertical and horizontal analysis of each company's balance sheet and income statement in this particular case will be enlightening. A vertical analysis will for instance shed some light on how revenue is being used. In this case, each component of the companies' financial statements will be converted into a percentage of a key component of either the balance sheet or the income statement. A special common size balance sheet and income statement will be utilized to ease comparison. The
3) Based on the data in Exhibit 7 and the definition of operating income gains given
In this case the concentration is on “Company Performance Measurement”, using the “Ratios”, before we answer to the question, we have to focus a bit on the “Financial Ratios”
Part 1 : Examine and analyze the financial ratios for eight pairs of unidentified companies and match the description of the company with the financial profile derived from the financial ratios.