The impact of American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 in the Latino Community. (1) Unemployment: Changes in unemployment during the recession reveal a rapidly worsening situation for foreign-born Hispanics and native-born Hispanics. The unemployment rates for these groups increased by similar amounts from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2008. However, the number of unemployed persons increased at a much faster rate for foreign-born Hispanics. The unemployment rate for foreign-born Hispanic increased from 5.1% to 8.0%. The 2.9 percentage point rise was greater than the 2.0 percentage point increase in the overall economy as the unemployment rate for all persons rose from 4.6% to 6.6%. The unemployment rate for …show more content…
Building off the Recovery Act, the tax agreement extended key provisions including the Earned Income Tax Credit ( EITC) and the Child Tax Credit ( CTC) that directly benefit an estimated 3.7 million Hispanic families, including 8 million Hispanic children. The president also signed into law 18 direct tax break to bolster small business growth. Also, Cut taxes by $400 for individuals and $800 for families through reduction of withholding. That confused many people who expected checks like the Bush Tax Cuts. A payment of an additional $250 each to recipients of Social Security, veterans pension and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. $70 billion to extend the Alternative Minimum Tax shelter. Congress extends it each year. A $2,500 college tuition tax credit for 2009 and 2010. An $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers in 2009 only. ( It was later extended through April 2010.) A deduction of sales tax on new car purchases through 2009 only. Unemployment benefits were extended for another 33 weeks. A suspension of taxes on the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits through 2009. Taking Action to Strengthen the Recovery: The president fought to continue the payroll tax cut into 2012, ensuring that taxes do not go up on nearly 25 million Hispanic workers, and to extend unemployment insurance so that Americans looking for
"They discounted a lot of positive growth effects of tax reform package," Huffman said of the recent analysis. "That's one government analysis, granted what some folks would call 'mainstream.' History proves that tax reform — tax cuts specifically — they grow the federal revenue. Why? Businesses make more money and people have larger paychecks and they are putting more into the economy."
Introduced in July 2012, H.R. 8, the Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012, sponsored by Representative Dave Camp of Michigan, was approved by the House of Representatives in August 2012 and forwarded to the Senate for consideration. Opponents of H.R. 8 maintain that the plan does not provide tax cuts for all American taxpayers while supporters on both sides of the aisle argue that these changes to the Internal Revenue Code are needed to sustain the nation's economic recovery and prevent another recession. To determine the facts in the debate over H.R. 8, the Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012, this paper provides a review of relevant governmental and media sources, followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
Overall, there are dozens of other tax cut extensions in this Bush Tax Cut Extension bill that were recently passed. I touched on some of the key ones that affect individuals. I am happy and grateful that it did pass as well as millions of other Americans most likely are. This helps students, parents, homeowners, working individuals, married couples, investors, and really every individual. We are all in some way, shape, or form affected by these tax
The costs to the economy and individuals are substantial. Being unemployed affects individuals and the economy in the long run. Unemployment has been significantly higher among the young people who have low level of education or living in low socioeconomic income areas. High unemployment rates affect government expenditure which would result in higher benefit payments and low tax
The economy growth slowed to half a per cent and the unemployment rate has risen to around 5.75 per cent by November 2009, which remained this level to 2011.(RBA)
The federal government and many state governments offer various tax credits, incentives and larger Section 179 deductions for increasing energy efficiency, accommodating people with disabilities, removing architectural and transportation barriers to mobility-challenged people and encouraging entrepreneurs to revitalize certain enterprise zones in some urban cities and areas where natural disasters have occurred.
The anecdotal explanation for the American economy for years has been that the number of jobs have increased but wages have not grown as rapidly. This held true again on Friday, April 1, 2016 as 215,000 jobs were added to the US economy. Because this amount exceeded the predicted 199,000 jobs, this gain was considered a healthy one.
It is argued by some people that tax cuts serve as economic stimulus, such as it may accelerate job growth, and provide short-term employment. Shuai and Christine (2013) suggests that corporate tax cuts can boost job growth (p.191). Using data from the Tax
previous year while the number of unemployed persons fell 2.6 percent from the previous year to
Though the employment rate has gone up over the years and as per an article in
The unemployment rate rose from 24.78% in 2012 to 26.09% the following year. Staring 2014, the
insurance or assistance available in the country. Hence an increase in the unemployment rate may lead to an
The tax rate for individual and corporate tax was reduced to bring more people under the tax net.
With the rise of 12,000 newly unemployed people in the recent quarter, the government has seen the end of unemployment falls. This seems to continue into the near future, with no relief yet prominent in the issues of less demand and decreased consumer spending. Further, more people are continuing to lose their jobs and this will only cause the reduction in spending power of families, decrease money in the economy and increase in reliance upon the state. (William Schomberg and Christine Murray 2013)
Despite uneven monthly jobs data, the economy’s labor utilization continued to rise. In January and February, 201,000 and 266,000 jobs were added, respectively. March jobs numbers, however, were disappointing adding only 119,000 jobs causing the unemployment rate to stay unchanged at 5.5% in February and March. Nevertheless, the unemployment rate continued to fall in the first quarter and the trend continued in April and May. Total number of jobs added in the first quarter was 552,000. April job numbers confirmed that March was a one-off dip, adding 221,000 jobs, which brought the unemployment rate down to 5.4%. Although 280,000 jobs were added in May, unemployment rate was recorded 5.5%, due to an increase in the civilian labor force by 0.25% compared to a 0.1% increase in April.