preview

Large Mealworm

Satisfactory Essays

In 1970s, Eric Charnov's colleagues conducted an experiment on a small bird Parus major, based on the hypothesis proposed by Eric Charnov and Gordon Orions - that a forager's problem to gain maximum food efficiency, could be broken down into two problems . - what to eat and when to stop, and each could be described by a distinct economic model.
Based on this hypothesis, the Prey model was presented by Charnov and his colleagues David Stephens and John Krebs in Foraging Theory, in which Charnov assumed that searching for food costs animals something, the energy that it takes to search.

He suggested that Goals of the Prey model is to characterize the decision making phase. In order to make an efficient foraging decision, Charnov reasoned, a forager needs to know 4 things - energy gained from …show more content…

In 1970s, Jonathan Erichsen and Michael Webber, conducted an experiment on a small bird Parus major. In order to create two pre items of known meal value, they created a large mealworm (1/8th f whole) and a small mealworm (1/16th of whole mealworm). To create an artificial foraging environment, they places a rubber conveyor r belt under the cage, where the food was placed and timed as to when it will appear on the belt.
With 5 birds and testing their initial patterns, they formulated a hypothesis as to which birds will eat large vs small mealworm . Interestingly, their findings were very similar to what they had predicted. Only anomaly was that zero-one rule was not as per the predictions and saw a variance where 85% of worms took large mealworms compared to prediction of 100%.

Many more such tests of prey model have been conducted with species ranging from insects to mammals with similar results.
In these experiments, the independence of inclusion from encounter rate principle seems to be widely supported, whereas zero-one rule seems not to be precisely

Get Access