preview

Land Ownership In Robert Frost's 'The Interlopers'

Decent Essays

You are quite a case of blissfully unaware while seeming all knowing. You were honorable in “the interlopers” by saki, in the sense of fighting for what you believe in. But your story was about the owning and boundaries of land, something that is inconsistent with being honorable. Land, while it shall be something that can be bought told and owned, it doesn't make sense to have arguments over it. This is because land only legally can belong to one specific person, family, or group, but naturally it can not be owned as it is a part of the wild earth we inhabit. Your failure to understand this caused the same nature that you spent most of trying to prove belonged to you, to end your life. Therefore I say that land ownership should not be fought over, as all land truly belongs to no one but nature itself. Firstly, In the midst of all, you were angrily speaking to your enemy in the forest. A forest that you believed be stolen from your family. “Ulrich von Gradwitz snared in his stolen forest ‘There's real justice for you”.(p.153). But your forest was not stolen you …show more content…

“The neighbor feud had grown into a personal one since Ulrich had come to be head of his family; if there was a man in the world whom he detested and wished ill to, it was Georg Znaeym, the inheritor of the quarrel and the tireless game snatcher and raider of the disputed border forest.”. You wished ill to this man just because of a border battle of lands that truly don’t belong to either of you. You wished bad things upon him and had battles of pettiness about things that don’t matter or belong to either of you. Neither of you have the right to own this land let alone have arguments and want to end each other's lives over

Get Access