preview

Laguna Art Museum

Better Essays

On Thursday March 22nd, I visited the Laguna Art Museum with my boyfriend. I was very excited for this assignment because I am a member at the Laguna art museum, but didn’t yet see the new exhibit for this season. The Laguna Art Museum is small and therefore, usually runs exhibits on one artist at the time. I knew I would more than likely only be able to pick art pieces from one artist. At this time, they were displaying a local artist, Tony DeLap, and work from his collection titled, “Retrospective”. My expectation was that I probably wouldn’t enjoy his work too much. I knew DeLap was a minimalist, “op artist”, and that style of work isn’t my favorite, typically I enjoy realist paintings. However, I decided that I should try and analyze art …show more content…

This painting was created by Tony DeLap in 2017 and measures 42 x 84 x 2 (according to the docent). “Circus Time” was created using acrylic paint on canvas and was on display on the first floor in gallery #3. I liked this painting because it seemed very playful and it had the most color out of all DeLap’s work. The second painting I chose was titled, “Gherkin” also painted by Tony DeLap. “Gherkin” was created in 1961. This painting was made with acrylic paint on canvas and the measurements were not listed, but it was a very big canvas, much taller and wider than myself, and almost took up a full wall. “Gherkin” was on display on the main floor in gallery #1. I liked “Gherkin” because it was so big and I couldn’t help but pay attention to it. The painting was very symmetrical but I didn’t like the colors as much. They were darker and less interesting than “Circus Time”. Finally, I chose “Cut into the Crimp II” as the painting I did not enjoy as much. “Cut into the Crimp II” was created in 1981 by Tony DeLap. It was created using canvas, wood, and acrylic paint. This painting was smaller, and took up a very small space of the wall, but the dimensions were also not listed. “Cut into the Crimp II” was on display on the first floor in gallery #3. I did not like this work because it was just a black square and I didn’t find it that interesting. I will mention though, that a lot of time it looked like DeLap created his own …show more content…

Even though the shapes where different (Triangle and Square), both were about the same size and tilted in the same way making it feel repetitive. “Circus Time” was also interesting because there was but also was not a focal point. I feel like there was a focal point because every time I looked at the painting I started with the empty shape in the middle and then looked at the rest. However, my boyfriend said he didn’t really know where to start looking with the painting. He said the colors were distracting but the empty space also caught his attention. After close consideration, I feel like “Circus Time” is more an example of “Brownian motion”. The artist didn’t use a focal points or perspectives to lead my eye anywhere; instead my eye naturally wandered around the painting not stopping at one

Get Access