Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods
A popular debate in the United States that’s been ongoing since 1990, is the labeling on Genetically Modified or Engineered foods otherwise known as GMO’s. Genetically engineered food is an unnatural process of plant or meat products. These two products have had their DNA artificially altered in a laboratory by genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria to produce foreign genes in food. Monsanto, an agriculture company, claims the reason behind this experimental genetic alteration was said to produce a multiplying supply to feed the world. Nevertheless, Americans are in a debate with the government to label genetically engineered food due to several reasons. Labeling genetically engineered ingredients will help consumers determine which products they decide to consume. The FDA published a policy that states they do not require labeling of GMO foods. Americans and people all over the world feel that they should have the right to know what they are purchasing and consuming due to a list of health, environmental, ethical, and religious reasons.
People all over the world have a right to know what they are purchasing and consuming. The US government thinks otherwise. There have been no conclusive studies that show that genetically modified foods are safe to consume. The US Food and Drug Administration does not think it’s necessary to require safety studies for genetically engineered foods. The article “About GE Food Labeling”,
A GMO is a genetically modified organism that goes through the process of genetic engineering. This is when genes of one organism are extracted, altered, and then artificially placed into another organism to then grow. We typically see GMOs in the food we consume every day. These foods include fruits and vegetables, however the most common organisms that are genetically engineered include, corn, soy, and cotton. It is ultimately the unnatural cross breeding of plants, animals, bacteria, and virus genes (Non-GMO Project). But now why is there a debate for placing a label to notify consumers of GMOs in their foods? Do we know the potential harm that GMOs can cause? We have the right to know what we are putting into our bodies and what is found in our everyday foods.
The Federal Government should require labeling of GMO’s on genetically modified foods. The people deserve to know what they put in their bodies. Some of the food is very unhealthy and some people are completely unaware of that fact. Many food companies do not put out all the information about what goes into the food in which we consume, if the Federal government were to require labeling of all GMO foods then the people could be well educated about what they put inside their bodies, and know if it is good for them or not. GMO stands for genetically modified foods, a genetically modified food is “..an organism whose genome has been altered by the techniques of genetic engineering so that its DNA contains one or more genes not normally found
Foods with GMO ingredients need to be labeled because they are bad for your health. GMOs are not proven to be safe in the long run. The FDA has not run any tests to tell whether or not GMOs are safe. GMOs are linked to birth defects, and to Gluten disorders. According to USRTK, “ The FDA does not require independent pre-market safety testing for genetically engineered food. As a matter of practice, the agrichemical companies submit their own studies to the FDA as part of a
There are varied arguments that favor or are against compulsory labeling of genetically engineered food products. Those who argue for the labeling of such products argue that consumers have a right to know what is contained in their food, particularly food products for which there have been health and environmental concerns (Caswell 26). Compulsory labeling will permit consumers to identify and avoid those food products that may cause them problems. On the contrary, those who argue against mandatory labeling point out that
The debate over genetically modified foods continues to haunt producers and consumers alike. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are foods that have been modified through bioengineering to possess certain characteristics. These plants have been modified in the laboratory to enhance traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or increased nutritional content (Whitman, 2000). The debate continues to grow as to whether these genetically altered foodstuffs are the answer to hunger in the coming years, or whether we are simply children playing with something that we do not have the capacity to understand. One of the biggest debates in the GMO issue is whether producers need to use labeling of
Ian Somerhalder is a very successful actor and he is speaking out about the issue of fracking, and you might ask yourself why would a successful actor care about oil fracking? It’s because this issue affects everyone as he says, “whether you are reading this in New York state or in Japan fracking is screwing you over” (AZ Quotes). Sean Lennon wrote an article on Fracking in the New York Times called “Destroying Precious Land For Gas:”. He is a famous musician as well as his father, John Lennon, the Beatles singer, and his mother Yoko Ono. Sean Lennon also believes that fracking is a terrible thing to do. Lennon published his article in the New York Times on August 27, 2012 and shows how fracking is terrible for the environment. He also shows
The advancement of technology has allowed our generation to genetically modify food for what is believed to be beneficial to consumers. The environmental and health effects of genetically modified foods have generated controversy about whether these foods are safe. With such advances, the use of genetically modified food is expanding, even though they 're unlabeled. Genetically modified foods should be labeled because of the possible health, environmental, and economic risks. Once a consumer knows what they are paying for, it is fair to produce and market such foods.
Ever since their entrance onto the consumer market in the last two decades of the twentieth century, genetically modified organisms (often referred to as GMOs) have been getting mixed reviews from the public. Genetically modified consumer products (primarily food) have pushed the barriers of some people's comfort levels. Born out of either a lack of knowledge or a sincere concern for public health or the environment, a consumer rights movement has been planted around the world pushing for labeling of genetically modified food products. This movement has matured in many places to a degree where interest groups have successfully lobbied governments into adopting criteria for labeling transgenic food
Interpretive context is the different ways people interpret things based on different evidence. Plausible evidence helps with your interpretive context, you can make your interpretive context different depending on what evidence you use and what you decide to emphasize more in your writing (Rosenwasser 121). Your thesis is kind of like a camera lens. This lens can make you see the subject in the paper differently, and depending on your subject you may have to change the lens.
GMO’s stands for genetically modified organism, which are organisms that have had their genes altered or genetically engineered so that it can have resistance to pesticides and have rapid growth . Food markets around the United States sell products that are organic as well as genetically modified products but, as a society, we are not fully aware of that. Through reading the The Secret Life of Plants by Ferris Jabr, it lead us to think about how we are not aware of what produce we buy in our local food markets. We as a society in this democracy should have the knowledge of what we put into our body. Labeling Genetically Modified Organisms in food markets allows the consumers to know what they are eating and help them make the decision to buy the produce or not.
I believe that GMO foods should have labels indicating that they are made from genetic material. This would positively support the society, the environment, and the economy. The entire world would benefit by companies simply putting more informing labels on their products. The most important aspect of this question is the positive social consequence of putting labels on GMO foods. People would be alerted to “the potentials to provoke allergic reaction, gene transfer, and outcrossing” (Frequently Asked Questions on Genetically Modified Foods). This could be life changing in some cases in case there was a genetically modified food that was changed with something that might cause a severe allergic reaction to someone. This would also be helpful
The analysis and evaluation the proponent’s use for of the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act come from many scientific organizations and governmental organizations. Proponents believe that it is more important to try to feed the world, and solve world hunger than it is to worry about labeling genetically engineered foods. Since their argument is about how genetically engineered foods should not have a labeling requirement due to the fact these foods are no different it would essentially cause more confusion to the public. Some studies conducted by the companies producing the biotech crops like Monsanto, did not show any negative effects on mice
In the recent years, Genetically Modified organisms (GMOs) have in numerous ways affected the composition of our diets considering the fact that they have replaced our healthy and naturally produced food with genetically altered food. These alterations have had significant effects on human health and the society in general. These pesticide resistant foods are products of merging genes of different species together through genetic engineering. When individuals consume these genetically modified foods, they are at a high risk of contracting various diseases including terminal illnesses such as cancer (Smith & Genetic Roulette 258). On numerous occasions individuals do not realize that they are consuming these harmful toxins as they are infused into different foods without the knowledge of consumers (Pence 153). Labelling of GMOs stands out as the perfect solution that will help consumers differentiate foods with GMOs and those produced exclusively through natural processes. Despite the existence of farmers who maintain traditional and natural farming practices, those who choose involve GMOs in the production of their foods make more profits with less efforts and time involved. This study seeks to advocate for the labelling of GMOs to create and promote human awareness.
The addition of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s) also commonly known as Genetically Engineered (GE) to our food products have been a heated controversy for some time now. This debate is currently attracting a lot of consumer/media interest in 2014. From the 1990’s on, GE foods have been consumed by millions of Americans and humans across the world. So what exactly are GE foods? DNA (genes) from one species is genetically engineered into certain animals and plants with a specific predicted outcome to be the result. Some types of gene modifications are made to enhance flavor, conserve natural resources, increase nutrients or create
A new kind of foods called the genetically modified foods has been creating a quiet revolution in the American market for the past several years. Scientists are able to produce these new foods by transferring genes from one organism into another across species boundaries. This new technique has been developed to improve the shelf life, nutritional content, flavor, color, and texture of foods. Since 1994, about 45 genetically modified foods such as tomato, corn, soybeans, canola, and potatoes have been marketed in the United States. About two-thirds of foods that are processed in U.S. contain genetically modified ingredients. So, we the people are consuming these foods without realizing the fact that they are not produced naturally.