King Kong: The Entertainment of the Masses “It's money and adventure and fame. It's the thrill of a lifetime and a long sea voyage that starts at six o'clock tomorrow morning” (King Kong, Carl Denham). As Carl Denham (Robert Armstrong) drags King Kong to Broadway, he makes ten thousand dollars in just one night for the exhibition of “the Eighth Wonder of the World.” Thousands of New Yorkers paid twenty dollars per ticket, or the equivalent to three hundred sixty-nine dollars in today’s currency, to gaze at a prehistoric ape. This gaze found in King Kong is the “imperial gaze” developed against foreigners in early Hollywood travel films. Ann Kaplan comments on early travel films in “Hollywood, Science and Cinema: The Imperial and the Male Gaze in Classic Film” and states that: “They [travelers] mainly went to dominate, exploit and to use the Other for their own ends.” (61). For this reason, the …show more content…
Right after the audience gazes and criticises Kong for the first time, Denham asks the press to “take the first photographs of Kong and his captors.” As the sixteen photographers begin to take pictures, Kong roars in fury. Since Denham is only interested in the profit that can be generated from the press, he quickly calms the audience and tells the photographer to capture a photo of Ann (Fay Wray) and Driscoll (Bruce Cabot). A closeup of the flashing cameras is shown and then Kong gets out of control. It is worthy to mention that Kong had not roared as loud as in this scene (not on stage at least) to notice that the flash was what triggered Kong to act in a savage manner. It is then clear that the use of technology enraged Kong because he felt estranged and threaten. The camera symbolizes how the white traveler dehumanizes the foreign individual and reproduces this visualization to the rest of the
Looking at The King of Kong: Fistful of Quarters, we can see the first aspect used is the on-camera interview. The opening shot of this movie is an interview of the World Champion Donkey Kong player. The film itself has multiple interviews with different people. Most of the film is footage from the interviews. The directors take time to interview the World Champion, the challenger, the referee, other world champions of other games, and the families of the competitors. The interviews gave the audience a sense of who the person was and gave us some background information on their skill and how they came to like the game. Given the interviews, we were able to gain extra information about the gamers that we might not have been able to see from just watching them play the game. Additionally, it would be hard to make a movie about the Donkey Kong Champion without making it a documentary full of interviews. The interviews conducted informed the audience on the
In contrast with interviews that James conducts as a source or witness, in which he sets the mise-en-scene, James tends to keep the camera true-to-life with the mother (Bellour, 50). James maintains a shaky camera technique to solidify his position as “the eye looking into their world.” During panning or other establishing shots, narrated sequences, and interviews with characters, a tripod is used to separate those moments from the story. Although not entirely non-diegetic, the interviews are spaces in the film shot outside of the story. The audience is given confirmation of how William and Arthur must be feeling during this time, allowing character development. Along with the ethical concerns of not tampering with reality, aesthetic efforts during the interviews was necessary to separate them from reality (Ellis, 222)
Classic stories remain a classic because they convey a message which appeals to people of multiple generations despite changes in society. King Kong was released in print in 1932, a year prior to its release in Hollywood, as a part of the film’s advance marketing. The public of this generation easily accepted the story’s racist, colonialist, and sexist themes. Today, literary critics such as Cynthia Erb view the novel and film as representation of the early 30s and thus a resource to understand the cultural context of the times. In particular, King Kong provides a window through which a modern audience can understand and interpret racism of the 1930s.
This essay is based on films of the same story, told in different ways, with emphasis, themes, meaning and interpretation shaped or shaded by the situation of the storyteller; the cinematic mise-en-scene. Based on the same story, the films reveal and reflect the film-maker’s social norms and views, emerging from their different national contexts. While exploring the two films, this essay will examine elements of film language or semiotics: color saturation (or black and white), sound, setting, type of camera angles used; repetition of visual motifs (Metz, 1985). The two films explored were made in the 1960s. Neither film is American, yet both reveal influences and reflections on American cinema and American power; the Western film, adherence or detracting from Hollywood Classical cinema tropes, i.e. close-ups, shot-reverse-shot, POV, depth of field (Bazin, 1985: 128-9). The two films are Kurasawa’s Yojimbo (1961) and Leone’s Fistful of Dollars (1964), from Japan and Italy, respectively. How are they different; how similar? Why do they use the same plot,
1. The thesis of this essay in the author's words is "Travel is how we put a voice to the Other and step a little beyond our second hand images of the alien." In other words, the author is trying to tell us that travelling is necessary in order for us to not hold prejudices and experience the lifestyle of other cultures.
It was November 20th, 2015, seven days after “the incident”. The sky was filled with patches of darkness. Marc Darko an angry, depressed, and brave man was on his way to Chicago because he needed to leave Wong Kong after “the incident”. When Marc Darko lived in Wong Kong he didn’t have a great time there.
The portrayal of ET transitions from creepy and terrifying to unusual and harmless. The development of this scene through cinematography creates a unique
obviously an allusion to the gigantic ape King Kong, which is an expression of his
Symbolism is an inherent literary device used throughout Ishirō Honda’s 1962 film King Kong vs. Godzilla. By utilizing two of the most iconic monsters in cinematic history, King Kong and Godzilla, Honda depicts the shift from one culture to another and the battle that ensued. Honda also shows the different cultures that King Kong and Godzilla represent: Kong as the embodiment of modern Japanese culture, while Godzilla represents the traditional Japanese culture. However, when comparing these two creatures, one must first look at their origins from two other supplemental sources: Merian Cooper’s 1933 film King Kong and Ishirō Honda’s 1954 film Godzilla. These films reveal how each entity differs from Ishirō Honda’s 1962 film King Kong vs.
clever camera techniques which create tension and fear. The camera shots also pay close attention to detail. For example, when the man with the dog throws a stick for his dog to fetch into the sea, the camera
Cinema of Attractions is concerned with the ability to display. Attractions wanted to show the ‘here and now’, interacting with its spectator with the aim of satisfying the audience’s curiosity quickly (Gunning, 2004: 44). It displays current events, scenes form everyday life, composed scenes, vaudeville performances and also camera tricks (as pioneered by George Méliès). Cinema of Attractions aims to astonish its audience (Strauven, 1999: 50). through displaying, rather than amusing its audience through narrative content. This is seen in films such as G. Méliès’ ‘ L'homme-orchestre (One Man Band)’ (1900), or his ‘L'homme à la tête de caoutchouc (The Man With The Rubber Head)’ (1901) where the actor(s) constantly address the camera/spectator and the audience is
In this film, diegetic sounds and non-diegetic sounds effectively help explain the scenarios through the nature awareness. Kubrick first states that the main concept of the film is forced more on a visual experience than anything else; however, the layers of sound have actually created a strong impact and attract the audience’s attention. Kubrick demonstrates the nature of humanity by using the relationships with technology, violence, sexuality, and social awareness. The film first introduces the importance of violence through the apes that the violence seems to be a way to control others, no matter in the animal world or the humanity society. In the sequence, “The Dawn of Man,” one of the important scenes illustrates how apes find tools and use them as weapons to fight with each other.
King Kong is the perfect example of the early development of motion picture music in the twentieth century. The music was not only essential to the film, but musical scores also made the film better for the audience. Clever composers created a true musical drama; Max Steiner was known for his musical ability including films like Gone with the Wind. Steiner spent a lot of amount on the music of film King Kong 1933. The music meant everything to that picture, and the picture meant everything to RKO, because it saved the studio from bankruptcy…. The impact of King Kong on the movie-going public was astonishing. It emerged into a country frightened, impoverished, in the grip of the Great Depression.
The two movies I decided to do a film review on was Money Monster and The Big Short. Money Monster released on May 13th, 2016 was directed by Jodie Foster an award winning American actress () . Foster has been a successful actress ever since she was young,at age 12 she received an Oscar nomination for the film Taxi driver eventually leading to her winning a Golden Globe and being named as one of the best actresses of her generation(). The movie Money Monster is about a frustrated investor by the name of Kyle Budwell who lost $60,000,as a result of investing in a company called IBIS. The company had an unexpected glitch to the system during a trading algorithm, which led to a loss of $800 million for IBIS investors. Due to the unexpected financial loss Kyle faces he decides to make an unexpected
pag) and (“Universal Studios Hollywood” 13). On the island, the filmmakers find that the inhabitants live within a huge palisade as protection from the island's monsters (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag) and (“Universal Studios Hollywood” 13). But King Kong, most fearsome of them all, is only placated by sacrificial offerings of young women (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag) and (“Universal Studios Hollywood” 13). Ann Darrow is kidnapped and offered to the giant gorilla beast (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag). Instead of killing her, he is infatuated, fighting in her defense against the other monsters (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag). Jack Driscoll and the others rescue Ann and capture the giant gorilla that is then taken to New York for exhibition (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag). King Kong subsequently breaks loose and searches for Ann, terrorizing the city (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag). In the end, the great ape climbs with his beloved to the top of the Empire State Building, where fighting airplane flyers machine-gunned him to death (Selznick, Cooper and Schoedsack n. pag).