preview

Kill Lennie Justified

Good Essays

In the novella, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. George’s decision to kill Lennie at the end of the novel was justified.George and Lennie the main characters are best friends that travel to a new town in Salina California, to find a new jobs. But when George and Lennie got there Lennie made bad decisions. George shot Lennie at the end of the novel because of the mistakes he made. George needed to shoot Lennie he needed to be the one to do it. He needed to do it so the other farm members didn’t lynch him. George would have felt a regret like candy. He always would have had a horrible feeling for the rest of his life. Like candy when he didn’t kill his own dog and Carlson did. Some people might say that what George did was unjustified because Lennie is still a …show more content…

If George let Curley kill Lennie, then George would have felt the guilt because he wasn’t the one sending Lennie into a better place. Also he would of felt guilty because when he was talking to Candy, Candy said he felt guilty for letting Carlson kill his dog. If George didn’t kill Lennie, he would of suffered much more. George knew that he was the one that needed to make the change. Candy said “I ought to of shot that dog myself, George. I shouldn’t ought to of let no stranger shoot my dog.” The action that George did relate to the story, “Ohio Man’s Shooting Of Ailing Wife Raises Questions About ‘Mercy Killings”. For this Curley and all of his farm friends relate to the disease that is killing Mrs. Henderson. But Mr. Henderson relates to George, and Mrs. Henderson relates to Lennie getting killed. George didn’t want Curley to kill Lennie, and Mr. Henderson didn’t want the disease to kill his wife. George knew what he was doing, so he didn’t have to live the rest of his life with guilt. This made George’s actions justified because George would of had to lived to rest of his life knowing he made the wrong decision by not killing

Get Access