Kierkegaard
Kierkegaard felt that subjective reflection was more crucial to the individual life than objective reflection because it focused on passion and human existence instead of logic and impersonal truth. The objective world is the world of facts and truth independent of the perceptions of humans. Objective reflection focuses on what actually is, in the objective world. Objective reflection centers on the things and ideas in the world that can give meaning to life. The subjective world is the world of human thoughts, feelings, and perceptions. It focuses on the relationship between people and their thoughts, feelings, and perceptions in respect to their lives. It centers on how meaning in life is viewed subjectively, or how
…show more content…
The objective world is based in reason, while the subjective world is based in passion. Kierkegaard believed that subjective reflection was the key understanding meaning in life. He kind of complains with the objective reflection stating that it is impersonal and an indifferent relation to existence. As a matter of fact, this terminology as I shall call it, defines just what the objective world and objective reflection is: being independent of any human subjectivity. Subjective reflection naturally focuses on human existence in a personal, inward way without 'detachment' as Kierkegaard put it. Kierkegaard goes on to use the knowledge of God as an example to show why subjective reflection is more important. He believes that there is the objective reflection that states that this is the true God, but subjectively, the relation to God that the person has, is a God-relation. He makes sure to point out that there really is no truth in the situation without the relation to God because the relation to God is more important than the objective proof of God's existence. So with that in mind, to treat God objectively is to treat Him as an object. However, God is a subject and therefore can only be related to subjectively in inwardness. So it is the HOW which is important to Kierkegaard, not the WHAT. The strongest example of his reasons for this comes in his
In Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling, he discusses the "Three Movements to Faith." For Kierkegaard, faith of any kind involves a paradox. This paradox, as well as Kierkegaard's suggested path to faith, is illustrated by the main characters of Breaking the Waves, Bess and Jan.
However, as Kierkegaard has embraced subjectivity and some of the problems of language, he cannot attempt to prove God's existence as Descartes had done previously. Instead, Kierkegaard embraces the subjectivity and individualism of his day and, as an existentialist, "seeks to recover the practice of New Testament Christianity" within individuals instead of an established church (45). This approach to Christianity originates in the Reformation, and, like Luther, Kierkegaard is a strong supporter of reading the Bible for itself "without a commentary as a love letter from God" (46). By placing emphasis on the individual, Kierkegaard avoids needing to prove God outside of his own faith. In some ways, modernity has made it more possible to believe in God, as the focus is on individual reality instead of a single provable truth. In Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard addresses God by writing, "I am convinced that God is love; this thought has for me a pristine lyrical validity" (Kierkegaard 63). Here Kierkegaard qualifies his understanding of God as uniquely personal, emphasized by his use of phrases such as "I am convinced" and "for me". He makes no sweeping generalization; he simply uses the questions of modernity against those who would advocate for understanding the universe as
1. Subjective experience definitely constitutes knowledge. For instance, Jacquette offers her individual perspective regarding how advertisement affects ideals of beauty and personal identity formation in her exhibitt. Her perspective, as a woman working with feminist themes regarding women and domesticity, is certainly subjective. However, she offers relevant knowledge about the emotional toll and internalized biases that she experiences as a result of such media and messages. In her case, and in many others, and insider perspective reveals much about the greater outer workings of society on individuals. Obviously, someone consuming knowledge interpreted by the subject should be aware of who the subject contributing it is, and the subject should probably make their subjective
This passage deeply reveals Kierkegaard's thoughts on his age, being an age of reflection and deliberation. In his mind,
Influenced by the intellectual context of Kant 's and Hegel 's philosophies on the mind and theory of knowledge, Kierkegaard commented that "genuine anthropological
Philosopher say that reality is subjective. Have you ever looked at inkblot test that psychologist use? Ink blot is a great example of how people can view things differently; I can look at a picture and view it differently then some one else. People treat objects and events in her life according to their experiences and perception. Perception depends on the perspective of a certain person. Some people enjoy watching horror movies, and others consider them too scary or useless. Some people may horror movies to be provoking and filled with pointless pots. Peoples attitudes towards horror films depend on their acceptance of fear, death, anything against someone’s culture, and what an individual would consider evil in this world.
In the beginning God chose Abraham to be blessed with a child. Abraham would be the original father as his blood line will be carried on for generations. In Abraham elderly years’ god finally blessed him with a child named Isaac. When Isaac grew up god asked Abraham to take Isaac up to the mountain and sacrifice him. Without any question or hesitation Abraham did exactly what god wanted. That is why Kierkegaard picked Abraham because he trusted god with total obedience. For Kierkegaard what Abraham did not make any sense.
formulate a self concept or idea of what we are like (Saunders, 2013 , p.67). Mead essentially
The despair of necessity is due to the lack of possibility the fatalist is in despair because without God or the possibility you live in a dark place. When everything becomes necessary that’s when the person becomes a fatalist and loses the possibility. Without God you are in despair, you are lost in a world that is hopeless. The fatalist essentially can’t even breathe because he doesn’t have the ability to pray which is to breathe. Kierkegaard states that if there wasn’t a God you wouldn’t be able to pray and, therefore, you will lose the possibility, which would lead you to despair. When you believe that all things are possible you are avoiding despair even in the worse circumstances. On the other hand the fatalist doesn’t believe that things are possible, instead everything happens because it was meant to happen or because a cause and effect relationship.
Kierkegaard, in Works of Love uses 1 Cor. 8:1 “Love builds up” as a starting point to discuss how love can be discussed.
“Worldview by definition is a comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world especially from a specific standpoint (Definition of worldview, 2017)”. It is one’s own interpretation, their personal belief of how they see the world. Considering that, everyone’s ideal of a world view is unique. However, people do share affinities as a consequence of their culture, family and communities in which they live. This author feels that these shared affinities are what molded my worldview and my perception of spirituality.
Kierkegaard believed that only by transcending the thought of reason and taking a “Leap of Faith” could only then man come to know the existence (belief) of God. “ To one without faith, no explanation is possible”. This statement would put Aquinas in agreement with Kierkegaard and in opposition to his own earlier
The main focus in one of Soren Kierkegaard’s best works, Fear and Trembling, is about the “teleological suspension of the ethical”, which is where a higher law is the main priority, thus suspending the moral law. The book is written under a pseudonym, Johannes de Silentio, who talks about the biblical story of Abraham's compliant reaction to God's command to sacrifice his only son, Isaac. Primarily on the foundation of this story, Abraham has become renowned within the Judeo-Christian religion as the "father of faith". Abraham's readiness to sacrifice his son provides Kierkegaard with a chance to introduce challenging questions regarding the nature and value of Christianity. In this paper, we will focus on an interpretation of Fear and Trembling in which Kierkegaard challenges the Christians of his era, as well as emphasizes the difficulty of religious faith.
There is a sense of irony within Kierkegaard’s work. Kierkegaard’s theory of indirect communication shows us how truths cannot be transferred from one mind to another. Kierkegaard sees how man is part of nature, humanity, society to a certain extent but also how people have an inner life which he called ‘inwardness’ it is separate to the outside world and something that cannot be rationalised or articulated. According to Kierkegaard Hegel failed to recognise that people have an inner
As a result of people having different values, they also have different worldviews that change throughout their lifetime due to their unique experiences. A worldview is