Juvenile Justice Case Summary

On December 9, 1993, Jimmie Cates pled guilty to Simple Burlgary and was sentenced to three (3) years hard labor by Judge Robert Fleming. The court suspended the sentence and placed Jimmie Cates on three (3) years supervised probation. The court placed special conditions of paying court cost, paying a fine of $500.00, reimbursing the Indigent Defender Board $250.00 for legal services, and pay a $20.00 per month probation fee. There are no records at the office of Probation

On 03/31/17, Mr. Plaches was charged with Violation of Probation and sentenced to 24 Years at supervision level 5 with credit for 64 days previously served balance of sentence is suspended for 1 year level 4 Home Confinement, followed by 7 years at supervision level 3 (CRA#VS100079404).

On the day of 2nd March, 2009, the above-named defendant was granted twelve months supervised probation for the crime of violation of Section 18.2-96 as a Class 1 misdemeanor of the Virginia Penal Code.

Subsequently, Judge Andrew Hyde imposed a jointly recommended sentence of 90 days on each count. The two terms are to be served concurrently, with all but 30 days suspended in favor of one year of probation.

David Smith had proven himself to be a danger to the community when he decided to consume significant amounts of alcohol and then operate a motor vehicle. He has since been before this court on these same charges three times prior since 2009. As a matter of fact, Mr. Smith is out on bond for his four Driving Under Influence conviction in which he is scheduled to turn himself over to the Bureau of Prisons to begin a three-year sentence. While waiting to begin his sentence, Mr. Smith still continues to participate in a lifestyle that has brought him nothing but destitute. The court has given Mr. Smith several opportunities to address his alcohol addiction. As part of all of his past three convictions, Mr. Smith was ordered by the court to complete an alcohol treatment program. Mr. Smith has completed these programs and promised the court that he would not return to court with these same issues. Mr. Smith has lied to the court and has preyed on the mercy of the court. He has proven himself to be someone who cannot be trusted and is a danger to this community when he drinks and then gets behind the wheel of a vehicle. Mr. Smith has hurt his family and now in recent events brought great sorrow to another family. With all facts considered that is why I am seeking the maximum 20 years, without the possibility of probation or parole, to run consecutively with his the three years that he is already serving for the charge of Vehicular Homicide Tenn. Code Annotated

This is to inform you about Marcus Linares. On February 15, 2017, at 3:30 pm I met the client in his home located in Layton. I went over my role as an FRF and how can I help him and his family comply with their obligations with the juvenile court. Darlene (Guardian) made Marcus Appointment at Davis Behavioral Health and he is scheduled for February 22, 2017, at 10:45 am. This appointment will be to have him do the drug and alcohol evaluation and start his treatment.

The defendant was release to integrity house on 4/11/2017 on an inmate status. Since then, two offences on April 18, 2017 appear on his municipal record, but not on his arrest history. Integrity House was contacted via email requesting an update on the defendant's status. Ebone Reliford, William Terpak's primary counselor, replay that since William came into the program he has been compliant with the program rules and regulations thus

In separate cases two men whose names are Nicholas A. Kurchock and Jeremy M. Shafer. They returned to prison and their judges revoked their paroles and probation. Kurchock could remain in prison until March 7, 2018 and Shafer could remain in prison until Dec. 18, 2018. Kurchock violating his parole and probation by not reported to his supervising officer for 2 months, moving without permission, failing 2 drug tests, not finishing alcohol highway safety school, and song other stuff. He pleaded guilty on June 7 to, driving under the influence, stop sign violation, failure to obey traffic control devices, careless driving, and possession of a small amount of marijuana. He was sentenced to serve 5 days to six months in prison, 12 months on probation

He understood his rights and voluntarily answered questions. Inmate Adkins said he spoke to the victim on 02/04/17 at approximately 0730 hours. The discussion was regarding the victim being too loud during quiet time which is 1100 hours - 2200 hours because of court. Other inmates had issues with the victim being too loud and had was asked his multiple times to be quiet during quiet time. Inmate Adkins said he did not speak to the victim at all on 02/05/17. He also indicated he may have his days mixed up. DAR was not served because the 72 hour timeframe

The latest breaking news in The Democrat news is that Timothy L. Lee, from Fredericktown was sentenced to five years of probation following his guilty plea in Madison County Court in Dec. 17. Too the standard conditions of probation and all abuse conditions, the defendant is to serve 120 days in Madison County Jail. Lee was charged with the B felony of distribution, delivery, manufacture, producing or attempting to produce or possession with the intent to distribute, deliver, or produce a controlled substance. Lee was also charged with the D felony of unlawful use of a weapon. According to the Madison County Sheriff’s Department report, police officers filed in October at Lee’s house. The policeman found drugs such as paraphemalia, 20 pills

Brandon M: Client reported that he did not go to jail this week for his 5 days again; this time because his public defender did not bring the paperwork they needed to process him to court on Friday as she was supposed to. Therefore, he should be going next week. This delay with going to prison has created more anxiety, than his usual, and the anticipation has him stressed about gaining employment then having to tell them he must take off a week. Being that he went to the job fair at the Double Tree, he has been active with that pursuit and hopes something happens for him soon since he does not have the rent money. The priorities he listed are to remain sober, get a job, obtain shelter, get through Treatment Court, and find happiness.

COMES NOW the Defendant, Josue Emmanuel Rivera-Lemus, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Section 6A1. 2 the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”), United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540 (4th Cir. 2005), and this Court’s Policy Regarding Procedure to be followed in Sentencing, represents that he has reviewed the Probation Office’s Presentence Investigation Report and submits the Defendant’s Position with Respect to Sentencing to aid the Court in determining an appropriate sentence.

On June 17, 1959, in Spokane, Washington, Jerry Mempa was convicted of taking a stolen vehicle for a joyride. The presiding judge determined that a sentence of probation for two years was adequate for the crime committed. Unfortunately, Mempa who appeared to have been stuck in his criminal ways, was arrested for burglary only a few months later. Of course the county attorney moved that Mempa’s probation be revoked. The judge listened to the testimony of the probation officer, terminated probation, and resentenced Mempa to 10 years in prison.

Court ruled that he would be put on probation, yes probation. Then we have a young black male by the name of Jaquavias Sturgis. He also robbed a convenience store in Lee County. The young man stole $300 cash and took the clerk’s wallet and jewelry. He was also in possession of a gun.

On April 14, 2014; the offenders probation complaints were received by the Probation office’s intake department. Thus community supervision had commenced. At that time, he signed the rules and regulations associated with his responsibilities while under community supervision and he was also informed of his stipulations relative to his current probation period.