Justice, Public Interest And Open Justice

Discretion of the Court is the system of the court that governs individuals those who are charged for committing crimes, examine the time of their trial and other during major purposes of trial. A person who accused of committing a crime is normally is held in the jail till the time it is proved that whether the person is guilty or innocent. However, the court has the authority to bail out the person before the trial. But they would need certain documentation and that the person cannot leave the place until the trial takes place. Sometimes the person who is accused may also need to pay some fines or

Tom Robinson was convicted for committing a crime which he did not. The crime was raping Mayella Ewell. In his testimony he

Reporting on the case resulted in inaccurate facts and in majority failed to state Ms.Liebeck’s legal stance of pressing charges. Majority of newspapers, as well as news reporters failed

''The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain convictions by means of unlawful searches and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgment of the courts which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.'' [9]

Martin Luther King Jr. once quoted, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to Justice everywhere.” Teenagers around the world are capable of doing anything their mind is set to do. Once a teen is set in a crime they should be fully responsible for their actions. They should be expected to go through the consequences that are brought upon them. Therefore, we the citizens aren't getting the right safety we deserve. Proposition 21, helps us find our ways of treating Juveniles to see what is well-being for us citizens.

The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to

Good job this week Kyle, as you know legitimacy leads to connectivity through both public value and procedural justice. The public value portion is no more than the tolerance level that the public will allow you to get away with, which all leads to legitimacy. It’s a simple leadership practice that is very basic and taught by most executive level leaders, legitimacy in law enforcement is equivalent to what you should do and procedural justice in law enforcement is equivalent to what you can do.

Contempt law is now largely governed by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The Act was passed as a result of several UK defeats before the European Court of Human Rights and its aim was to make the law clearer and more liberal. The Act was also designed in

Immemorial, governments and individual citizens have had to walk a thin tightrope between the two ideals. This controversy was the catalyst that sparked the first ten amendments of the Constitution that we know as the Bill of Rights and, how in addition to these rights secured by America's forefathers, a number of institutions have arisen to ensure the protection of individual rights in an increasingly complex world. In order to add balance to this equation, the criminal

on the trial that Tom Robinson raped Mayella Ewell. He was simply blamed, because he

Justice is a concept that the American public values; yet, within Plato’s Republic, one is introduced to the idea of being just and walks away with a more philosophical understanding of the word. This, therefore, makes one question if America is truly ‘just’, specifically when looking at the 2016 Presidential Election. Plato values the idea of specialization within both the city and the soul, yet both American society and one of the main party’s candidates defy this. Justice (in both forms) stems from the idea of four virtues – wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. However, it is debatable if one could even find those values within both the American political system today and the Presidential candidates. The role of education is also important in Plato’s just society as education makes the person just, which in turn, makes the city just; however, this specific education that Plato advocates for is lacking within America. This, in turn, causes a conundrum on if justice is even possible. These factors, combined with the fact that the United States of America is a democracy and the type of knowledge that such a society values, leads one to conclude that Plato’s version of justice is impossible to create within American society today.

This paper is going to describe the road from arrest to Supreme Court, and the two ways a

To make the perfect colonial project, the right number and types of citizens are essential for the development of the colony. The 1000 citizens would be split up with 600 personally responsible citizens, 300 participatory citizens and 100 justice oriented citizens.1 We need participatory citizens who take an active role in the community, as well as personally responsible citizens which are responsible for themselves, they pay taxes, keep clean, and try not to be a burden on society. Finally the justice oriented citizens, the justice oriented citizens are people who investigate social, Political and economic problems and try to solve them. These citizens are essential for colonial development and success.

As for Criminal Contempt, it can be divided into three categories. First is contempt in the face of court during trial before a Judge which may take place in a court room or the chambers. A solicitor can be held contempt by challenging the

Justice can be defined as, valuing the diversity and challenging the injustice in society while human rights refer to, benefits an individual enjoys by virtual of being a human being. Justice is said to exist when all citizens share a general humanity and, therefore, experience equitable treatment, fair community resource sharing and human right support. According to justice citizens are not supposed to be discriminated, nor their well being or welfare prejudiced or constrained on the lines of gender, religion, age, belief, race, political affiliation and even sexuality.