Juror 3

12 Angry Men Essay Juror#3 In a crowded jury room in downtown New York, opinions collide as discussion about the innocence of a young boy is decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this stay of execution and is holding fast his opinion of guilty. Juror three, the president of his business, refuses to alter his vote or opinion in any way. Still haunted

murdering his father. This case consisted of a group of twelve jurors. These twelve jurors had so much about themselves that was alike and in some ways they were all different. In this case, the juror 3 and juror 8 are very different. Juror 3 appears to be a very intolerant person also he is known as a bully. On the other hand juror, 8 is an open minded individual that always listens to someone before speaking his part in something. Juror 3 also believes whatever I say I’m always right and nobody could

significant sources of prejudice-fuelled conflict stems from Juror 3, the bitter and obstinate juror whose vehement insistence on a guilty verdict is gradually revealed to be rooted in resentments with his own estranged son. Personally, I have also encountered situations where parents with domestic complications get dramatic and are unable to get over their personal barriers and enable them to give judicious judgement to other people. Juror 3’s arrogant condescension towards the defendants as “just another

challenges of the Jury system by using all the jurors' perspectives and ideas in the play. In the play, 12 “angry men,” Reginal Rose uses juror 3 to show the challenges in a jury system by demonstrating the bias people have; however, he also illustrates benefits by showcasing different peoples perspectives. Juror 3 displays the challenges of the jury system's proficiency because he came into the courtroom with his own biased thoughts. The other jurors were arguing about the boy's alibi and if they

10 is a dangerous juror in Reginald Rose's play Twelve Angry Men, juror 3 is the most dangerous because he has prejudice towards the defendant and does not listen to other points and evidence. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, justice means conformity to moral right, or to reason, truth, or fact. Firstly in the book, Juror 3 is on a rant about how kids are always hostile nowadays. Juror 8 says Juror 3 is wrong, this prompts Juror 3 to ask Juror 8 if he has kids and Juror 8 says yes. This

between Juror 3 and Juror 8 is that Juror 8 did his job as a juror and Juror 3 is basing his verdict on the fact that he doesn't give any freedom to those from the lower class because he simply doesn't like them. But one of Juror 3’s biggest problems is that he wants the deliberation to be over as fast as possible. When Juror 3 heard all of the evidence he had his mind set just based on his past experience without questioning some of the evidence presented in the case. On the other hand Juror 8 comes

Twelve jurors come in to a stuffy, hot, jury room after listening to a very long trial about a 17 year old boy that is being tried for murder They make small talk before actually discussing the case, one juror mentions how hot it is and another makes a comment on how she never would have known that if she hadn’t told her, which is a very rude sarcastic comment. After the first vote we immediately we see the juror who is in “left field”, being the only one in the room who votes not guilty. We see

Joselyn Lua Alatorre Mr Douthit Hon Eng II 05 March 2024 Stubbornness and Authority: A Comparison of Juror #3 and Creon Juror #3 and Creon are depicted by their stubbornness and authority, which shape their actions and interactions throughout the plays. When comparing Juror #3 from 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Creon from Antigone by Sophocles, it becomes evident that these characters share similarities and differences in character traits, arguments, and fates. While both characters exhibit solid

Joselyn Lua Alatorre Mr Douthit Hon Eng II 05 March 2024 Stubbornness and Authority: A Comparison of Juror #3 and Creon Juror #3 and Creon are depicted by their stubbornness and authority, which shape their actions and interactions throughout the plays. When comparing Juror #3 from 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Creon from Antigone by Sophocles, it becomes evident that these characters share similarities and differences in character traits, arguments, and fates. While both characters exhibit solid

Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh, it's been years since I've seen the movie (didn't read the play).  Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they

Juror 4 is an educated and logical man because all of his arguments are based on the facts and evidence. He also notices some details that other jurors ignored at the beginning. He illustrates that the murder weapon, which is an unusual carved handle and blade knife is a strong evidence that proves the boy is the suspect because

fallacious argument. In this movie there are many situations where people have used fallacious argument, which is listed below. #Juror 8.He is nineteen years old. Initially EIGHT argue that kid is only 19 years old, how could he kill his father. But this age is enough for thinking what to do or not. We have not any reasonable logic behind that kid can't murder. #Juror 8.There were eleven votes for guilty. If most of the people are supporting one thing then oppose them and telling that since

However, the knife that the young boy claimed that he lost was found in the murder. Twelve men were sent to be jurors to deliberate the trial. If the young boy was found to be guilty than the sentence for the accused is the death penalty. The men decided to take a break before making their decision and voting. After the break was over the men gathered together and eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty and

becomes instead a mini-drama of each of the jurors' lives, preconceptions and prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused and ultimately, each other. Based on the stage play, all of the film's action takes place in the jury room. On the surface, the case appears to be open-and-shut due to several facts: 1) The defendant possess only a weak alibi 2) a knife the boy claimed to have lost is then found at the murder scene by the police 3) several witnesses claimed to have been heard

By refusing to acknowledge the counterarguments, juror 7, inadvertently prohibited himself from listening to the other jurors, which would effectively crush the crucial link between the speaker and the receiver. In that way, one’s own prejudices blocked the way to a successful and meaningful conversation. Along with pride, prejudice