Julius Caesar Research Paper

Julius Caesar consolidated all power with himself as dictator, with the Roman senate acting as a powerless shell to please the people. He went to such extremes to gain power that Roman historian, Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, wrote that Caesar said, “Nam si violandum est jus, regnandi gratia violandum est: aliis rebus pietatem colas” (Tranquillius; I,30). Translated to English literally this means “Be just, unless a kingdom tempts to break the laws: for sovereign power alone can justify the cause.” and in laypeople's terms, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it.” He took his absolute power and used it to increase his popularity with the populace.

On March 15, 44 BCE, Julius Caesar was attacked by a group of conspirators and died within minutes due to multiple stab wounds. Before he was murdered, he was an adored consul of Rome, though some people believed he was gaining too much control and had to be stopped. While there were many conspirators and it is difficult to pin the blame on any specific person, the Casca brothers delivered the fatal blow. Therefore, they are responsible for the death of Julius Caesar.

(Julius Caesar Biography) Caesar began to have more adversaries once he started getting more power. With the measure of expert Caesar had, he transformed into a risk to the agents and the country (since he kept taking off various enhancements.) Caesar expected to control however much land and power as could be normal. Even though Caesar required tremendous control, he had envisioned that it was best for Rome to have serenity. He communicates that "It is more fundamental for Rome than for myself that I should survive. I have for quite a while been happy with power and splendor; be that as it may, should anything happen, Rome will welcome no peace. Another normal war will break out under much more unpleasant conditions than the

As he always won all the battles, conservative leaders tried to maneuver him out of the power and start their own programs. In 49 b.c.e. Caesar turned his army toward Rome, and in 46 b.c.e. He ruled all the roman empire and started to call himself as a dictator. Some of the rules that Caesar established alienated many members of the roman elite classes, who considered him a tyrant, so they organized to assassinate Julius Caesar and restore the republic.

Julius Caesar military activities were significant in Gaul, Germany and Britain, which as a result contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The combined result of Rome’s wars of expansion and competition among its leading men placed immense strain on the republic system. Julius Caesar, an ambitious man, craved the need for power, which he saw Gaul as an opportunity to conquer as Gaul lacked political unity and discipline. With the help of his devoted army and his genius with military tactics, Caesar was able to conquer Gaul with its advantages in favor for himself, gaining popularity as well as exploring new foreign grounds where no Roman has been before. However with great power Caesar was faced with new enemies and the challengers of Roman senate, which contributed to the fall of the Roman republic.

This investigation evaluates the question, to what extent did Julius Caesar 's assassination affect Rome, politically and socially. Gaius Julius Caesar, famously known for his brilliant military strategies and shrewd political expertise, helped transform the Roman Republic into one of the greatest civilization in the western world. During his reign, Julius Ceasar expanded Rome’s geographical territory across Ancient Europe immensely, conquering areas of present-day France and Britain. The investigation will primarily focus on the political opportunities created by Caesar 's death, as well as the public reaction, from the immediate ramifications to its long-term effect on the Roman government. Effects in foreign and other civilizations not directly involved with Roman affairs or within Rome will not included in the investigation. Sources for the investigation will include The Emperors of Rome by David Potter and the Ancient History Encyclopedia .

Cassius and Brutus are like brothers, but this relationship based on lie. Both brutus and cassius don't want Caesar to take the throne and decide to kill him, but both have different reasons. Cassius is just jealous, and brutus has a real reason. Brutus thinks Caesar will ruin everything and will get power cazy. Although brutus and cassius team up, they are very different and have nothing in common in their personality and way of thinking.

The ruler of Rome, Julius Caesar, was assassinated on March 15, 44 BC. W​hy 60 senators and friends of Caesar would commit such an act to bring down the leader of the most powerful republic in history, is widely disputed. The traditional explanation is because Caesar, the dictator for life, seized too much power. However, some people believe it could be a cover up for the social struggles between the wealthy and poor citizens. The second theory argues that Caesar’s nature of his political placement marked him for death because he attempted to repair the issues caused by the clashes within society.

There are two specific men that want to kill Caesar. These two men are very different and here’s why, The two men are Brutus and Cassius. Brutus is a much loved man, while Cassius is not. They also live in Rome. My thesis is that Cassius plans to take out Caesar and he is very fain about tit.

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony resembles Joe Biden in many ways. These two powerful, political figures have similarities between them that I would have never guessed would be there. For example, both men were allocated important roles to a leader or president. They were both appointed to be second in command, or a vice president to their chief. This also led to them having almost identical occupations in their later life. Another detail about these men is that they both had great loves of their lives at one point. These women both had an influential impact on one of the men’s lives. Mark Antony and Joe Biden have similar ways they speak and use some of the same methods into their speeches and writings. These

The Roman Republic was a system of procedures formed by tradition; there was no written constitution or legally binding legislation. Precedent and consensus set procedure creating the parameters for acceptable behaviour. However, it was near the end of the 2nd century BC, where the system began to deteriorate and fall, ultimately causing the civil war in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attempt to stabilise the administrative system of government and essentially control Rome. Caesar himself ignited the civil war as a result of the unstable Roman Republic, major events such as rebellion and revolts, senate and the political sphere and the breakdown of the triumvirate, which fuelled the motive for civil war. The corrupted Roman system alongside with personal issues and disagreements became the catalyst for the civil war of 49 BC and consequently set the parameters for the new dictatorial Roman world.

Caesar possessed too much power. They said he was becoming a threat to the Roman Republic,

The Roman Republic was a system of procedures formed by tradition; there was no written constitution or legally binding legislation. Precedent and consensus set procedure creating the parameters for acceptable behaviour. However, it was near the end of the 2nd century BC, where the system began to deteriorate and fall, ultimately causing civil war in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attempt to stabilise the administrative system of government and essentially control Rome. The republic itself, major events such as rebellion and revolts and individuals and gangs further fuelled the motive for civil war. The corrupted Roman system alongside with personal issues and disagreements became the catalyst for the civil war of 49 BC and consequently set the parameters for the new dictatorial Roman world.

The assassination of Julius Caesar in 44BC by conspiring members of the Roman senate was an effort to remove a dictator whose power had grown to extraordinary levels and to revive the Republic government. Caesar’s power span throughout the entire Roman Empire, which during his reign extended from present day Syria, down into parts of Africa, over to Spain, most of France and all of Italy. He had the favor of the people, military and most of the Roman government. Caesar’s death at the hand of conspirators did remove him from power; however, it did not restore the Republic government as the Senate had anticipated, on-the-other hand it gave rise to yet a more powerful dictator that was beyond what Caesar

One of the most defining moments in Roman history was the assassination of Gaius Julius Caesar on the 15th of March, 44 BCE. It sparked the transition from a republican to an imperial system of government for Rome. Caesar admired the idea of a government that was controlled by an individual (Imperialism), and not by senators constantly jostling for power (Republicanism). There are three points that suggest why his assassination was the key moment for the transition to take place. Firstly, Caesar emphasized heavily on the idea that a dictator would assist in the centralizing of power within Rome, therefor allowing Rome to endure as the dominant force throughout the Mediterranean. Secondly, after Caesar’s death, the second triumvirate was formed