JULIAN ASSANGE Introduction- Julian Assange was born on July 3, 1971, in Townsville, Australia. He used his genius IQ to hack into the databases of many high profile organizations. In 2006, Assange began working on Wikileaks, a Web site to collect and share confidential information of high profile organizations on an international scale. The information his organization released earned him strong supporters and powerful enemies. For his efforts, the internet activist earned the Time magazine "Person of the Year" title in 2010. After arriving at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London in June 2012, seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden, Assange was granted political asylum by the Ecuadorean government in August 2012. Making of the leader- Assange had an unusual upbringing as he used to travel around Australia with his parents, who worked as theatre artists and together they produced theatrical productions. His father later described Assange as a sharp kid who was an underdog. Shortly after words, his parents separated, but Assange continued to stay with his mother with the same transient lifestyle of moving around the countryside. In fact he ended up …show more content…
This also alienates him with several of his previous supporters and colleagues. In the managerial grid of Blake & Mouton, he would be positioned high in concern for production and low on concern for people. According to Hershey and Blanchard’s situational theory, the readiness of his followers is initially high, so that he will have a low relationship high task leadership style or the telling style, but due to his task-master image his followers would be less agreeable and willing to follow him, so that ideally he should be moving to a more selling type of leadership style, which is a high task high relationship way of leading. It means explaining task directions in a supportive and persuasive
On May 15, 1985 John E. Hauser moved a plastic box on top a computer table at his college; little did he know it was a bomb. When it went off, the shrapnel in the box severed fingers, blinded him, took off a chunk of his arm, and ruined his dreams of becoming an Airforce fighter pilot. This is just one of the many attacks the Unabomber did over the course of 17 years. Ted didn’t really care who he was attacking as long as he made an impact. Ted sent 16 bombs out to stop technology from advancing and for people to become dependant upon it.
Herschey and Blanchard, in their Situational Leadership theory, recommend that a leader adapts their leadership style on the basis of the maturity of the group or individual in dealing with specific situations. If an individual is new to the organisation and have a low level of expertise but a high level of motivation then a directing leadership style is likely to be most suitable, whereas an employee that has a higher level of skills but variable commitment may respond to a supportive style in order to build confidence.
Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian that came from a very wealthy family. He was born the seventeenth child out of fifty-two to the family of billionaire Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden in Saudi Arabia. From an early age he was somewhat obsessed with religion and politics. During his time in school he was devoting more of his time and money to advance Islam and Islamism. While Bin Laden was studying at a university in 1979 he decided to join the Mujahedeen military in Pakistan that was combating Soviet Union forces in Afghanistan. Bin Laden gained popularity by assisting the Mujahedeen in finances, personnel recruitment, and arms supply. After the war he moved to Afghanistan and declared war on the United States. It was he who founded the Al-Qaeda, which was the group that masterminded the September 11 attacks on the United States, along other numerous terror attacks around the world. From 2001 till his death in 2011, bin Laden was the number one target of the war on terror with a $25-million-dollar bounty placed on his head by the FBI. He was eventually shot and killed in a compound in
Julian Assange has been called many names; traitor, anarchist and even a high-tech terrorist, but the proper name for him is hero. WikiLeaks is an organization that truly works for the people. Keeping people informed with the inner workings of government, putting pressure on the press to acknowledge the truth and forcing change within government. WikiLeaks is driving journalism into the future and Assange is the driver.
On the charges of theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified intelligence to an unauthorized person, he is without a doubt guilty. Edward Snowden is a highly intelligent cyber-system operator, and now the most powerful weapon against the United States government. While working as a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) he discovered that his assignment was to access the information and webcams of every single American and even some people overseas. He views this surveillance as a gross misconduct of government power that virtually is unable to have oversight. No one was able to challenge this government espionage because the only ones who knew
I think it was ethical for Edward Snowden to reveal the classified information, simply because what the government has been doing was totally wrong. They violated the law and especially the Patriot Act based on the rule of the United States federal court. I understand that when people first heard about this they got very mad, because it was government classified information and he should have followed his job’s responsibility and kept it secret. Some people also started to question if Edward Snowden leaked more information about the army or war secrets, but nobody knows or can confirm that. I think most people would agree that no one is above the law, even the president. I think Edward Snowden is a hero and
It’s the summer of 2013; media outlets everywhere were plastering the words “NSA” and “Snowden” across their broadcasts. What did this mean for the typical citizen and who was Snowden? In June 2013 a man named Edward Snowden who worked with the National Security Agency (NSA) released over 1.7 million documents of NSA data to the public (“Edward Snowden”). There were many questions to be asked and an overwhelming amount of information and misinformation provided by the media.
What is it about American people knowing that their phones are tapped; their homes are under monitors or even that there are hundreds of satellites watching our every move outside of homes? It’s the invasion of privacy that people cannot get past, the fact they themselves have the potential of being spied on by their own government is a facet Americans have had a hard time swallowing. Edward Snowden informed us all of the sneaky surveillance our government uses to watch us, invade our privacy and in some cases use against us. It has been made into a controversy and in some cases a relief of knowing the unknown.
As the Hollywood plot unveiled, Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, took sides with Edward Snowden to help him find asylum. Assange and his team have started negotiations with Icelandic and Ecuadorian governments for the political asylum that Snowden pursues . Julian Assange himself lives under political asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since mid-2012, explained that Snowden had contacted them for
Edward Snowden is an American citizen born in 1983, he is a former CIA employee and a
Related to that, this essay is written as an effort to comprehend the role of individual in globalized world, especially by studying the case of Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This essay is divided in three parts. The first part of this essay explains background as well as global controversy surrounding Wikileaks and its spokesman, Julian Assange. The second part identifies the areas that Assange have directly impacted, especially in terms of participation, journalism practice and privacy. Finally, the last part of this essay reflects on Assange’s role in the globalized media economy, particularly drawing on his background as an Australian as well as the position of Australia in global economy.
In an article highlighting the benefits of WikiLeaks, Steven Greenhut explains that Julian Assange and his website have “done our nation a service”. Greenhut asserts
Situational leadership, developed by professor Paul Hersey and author and consultant Ken Blanchard. Their approach was based off of a 1967 article by W.J. Reddin called The 3-D Management Style Theory. In his article, Reddin discusses the need to have different styles based on the demands of the leader. A leader needs to be flexible in their approach to meet the needs of the job, their superior and their subordinates (1967). Hersey and Blanchard progressed this theory by introducing the Situational Leadership II model. Their model breaks leadership into four different styles, and how a leader must alter their approach in supporting and directing their subordinates based on a given situation. These styles are directing (S1), coaching (S2), supporting (S3) and delegating (S4). The model also focuses on the development level of the subordinates by categorizing them between low (D1), moderate (D2 and D3) and
Situational leadership focuses on adapting your leadership style or approach based on the situation and the amount of direction and support that is needed by followers. As Jesus trained and equipped his disciples from simple fishermen to fishers of men, who carried on his ministry after he ascended to heaven, he integrated different styles and theories of leadership that best served and supported his followers (Blanchard & Hodges, 2003). Depending on the level of competency and commitment of their people, leaders will adjust their style to provide the necessary support and direction. The core competencies of situational leaders are the ability to identify the performance, competence and commitment of others, and to be flexible (Paterson, 2013). From being highly directive, telling their people exactly what to do and how, to delegating, clearly stating the objective and allowing them to complete the task with little direction and support, situational leaders adapt their approach to the needs of their people and the particular situation.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).