Judgmentalism Vs. Wilson

President Wilson's own ineptitude and stubbornness is what led to the Senate's defeat of the Treaty of Versailles, rather than the strength of the opposing forces. Even Wilson's closest and most trusted advisors could not sway his stance. Wilson was strong in his stance and incorporated the idea of the 14 points. While it is true that opposing forces contributed to defeat the treaty, it was Wilson's unmovable position that led to its ultimate defeat in the Senate.

For example, in chapter four, Wilson talks a lot about Jeff (Alfred's cousin) a lot and about what amazing things he is doing. Wilson says, “Now your cousin Jeffs been all over the country talking about joining the Peace Corps after college” (Lipsyte 45). Wilson compares Alfred to Jeff and kept talking on about Jeff, even when it was clearly unnecessary. Wilson’s words demonstrate how Wilson compares Alfred to Jeff, the way I am compared to my brother all of the time, but I feel that he is trying to use it as a motivation for Alfred to do something great with his

James Wilson was born on September 14, 1742. He was born in Carskerdo, Scotland. He was the son of the respected farmer William Robert Covill Wilson (1692-1758) and Alison Landoll Wilson (1712-1792). James Wilson was the oldest of seven children. James’ dad wanted him to go to a Baptist school, but James ended up going to a Catholic school. James Wilson attended the Universities of St.Andrews, Glasgow, and Edinburgh. Though he went to all these different schools, he failed to earn a degree. James decided that he would study law. After many years of hard work and determination, James Wilson earned an honorary master’s degree. As a kid, James worked on his father’s farm. As an adult, he taught at a college for a couple of years, then started studying law. He then eventually passed the bar in Philadelphia 1767. November 1771, James Wilson married Rachel Bird. The married couple later on had 6 children together who all helped around the farm.

In literature, slavery and the African American race are often analyzed and interpreted by numerous authors. Mark Twain reveals numerous hitches and aspects of society’s view towards different races throughout many of his novels. In Pudd’nhead Wilson Twain describes the status of African Americans in society, as well as how they are portrayed or believed to act in the eyes of other townsfolk. The portrayal of Roxy and the status of Tom and Chambers both help Twain show the wrongs of the

Explain: Wilson clarifies how Margaret is cruel, along with other women. From this, the reader can tell how Margaret isn’t the only women he has met before. Also one can interpret that Wilson has also encountered this same situation before. This contributes to her character trait because he flat out says how shes is too cruel.

I have taken this from an external source to show the power of idealism, and how Woodrow was perceived.

While all previous cases of Wilson have been employed as a means of further developing characters. Complementing this role, Wilson also plays a noteworthy part in plot development. Following the death of Myrtle, who Daisy, in fact, killed, Wilson learns of Myrtle's affair. However, through his own odd logic, Wilson comes to believe that Myrtle was running out to see her lover, when in fact she was running away from Wilson himself.

They both compare with their reactions because there reaction Is to control the situation. The Evidence for Tom trying to control the situation Is when Tom says “I found out what your ‘drug stores’ were.”(Fitzgerald 141). In Wilson’s case the evidence is when he says “I’ve got my wife locked in up there,”...“She’s going to stay there till the day after tomorrow and then we’re going to move away.”(Fitzgerald 143).This shows that when he found out that ‘tomfoolery’ was happening between Daisy and Gatsby he tried to control the situation by turning Daisy’s opinions about Gatsby upside down. The evidence also shows that Wilson tried to control the situation by forcefully removing Myrtle and himself out of the situation. Tom and Wilson contrast in their reactions because Tom gives Daisy choices unlike Wilson who forces Myrtle into her room to wait until they move. The evidence for Tom giving Daisy choices is when he says “ Go on. He won’t annoy you. I think he realizes that his presumptuous little flirtation is over.”(Fitzgerald 142). Evidence for Wilson choosing to use force in the situation is when he says “I’ve got my wife locked in up there,”(Fitzgerald 143). The evidence for Tom’s reaction shows that he didn’t force her to go home , If she wanted Daisy could have driven off with Gatsby , but she didn’t. Unlike with Wilson's case the evidence shows that he forced her into her room and wait

In addition to the conflict in the story, there are scenes of rising action. One example of rising action occurs when Wilson and Macomber return to the wild to hunt for a lion once again. Macomber is able to get a shot off but only able to wound the lion before it runs away. As Wilson and Macomber search for the wounded lion to finish it off, he inevitably runs away frightened for a second time. Hemingway writes Macomber, “was running; running wildly, in panic in the open, running toward the stream.” As a result of this instance, Macomber’s wife takes a thriving interest in Wilson. Hemingway writes, “Once he had reached over to take his wife’s hand . . . she had removed her hand from his . . . his wife had reached forward and put her hand on Wilson’s shoulder . . . and kissed him on the mouth.” Later, Macomber’s wife sleeps with Wilson, which will completely change Macomber’s persona for the rest of the story. Macomber is so overcome with anger, his character quickly changes from cowardly to courageous.

Richard Wilson is a man’s man, and embodies Hemingway’s fascination with living life on the edge. The “white hunter,” Wilson, lives the life according to Hemingway values. Hemingway believes in the importance of physical activities and outdoorsmanship. Wilson has an attractive ruggedness, and embodies many of Hemingway’s code hero traits. Hemingway uses an allusion to a famous Shakespeare line to strengthen the character of Wilson.

Without Hemingway 's use of Wilson’s inner dialogue readers wouldn’t know what his thoughts on the affair are, neither would they know about his biased and role giving ways. Despite his prior judgments of Francis, near the end of the story Wilson shows a shift in his judgment when Francis, filled with anger, chases down and kills some buffalo. He says that Francis would “Be a damn fire eater now” and that Francis had his “Fear gone like an operation.” Because Francis gains the courage to hunt the buffalo without falter, Wilson believes that he is a “real man” now. This shows the shift in Wilson’s judgment of Francis, as well as how he perceives the role that Francis should fill. He views Francis as a coward who had never truly came of age before the buffalo hunt, which shows that Wilson believes that men should be fearless and able to hunt. Without Wilson’s perspective readers wouldn’t realize the amount of shift Wilson had in his judgment, nor would they have as much insight on Wilson’s ideals and standards. By allowing the readers to view multiple perspectives, the author allows the readers to see the judgmental, self biased, and role giving side of Wilson. He shows the growth of Wilson

Francis undergoes a change of his character throughout the story. He arrives in Africa, thinking that he is going to own everything and kill every animal in his way. When he gets there he realizes that it is not that simple. He is a civilized person who is not adapted to nature, and he is not capable of handling situations like hunting a lion. When he fails the shooting of the lion he becomes very ashamed, and he feels humiliated. Francis makes sure that Wilson is not going to tell about the mistake to anyone, because it would ruin the image he is trying to create. His wife, Margaret, does not want to talk to him, and on the way home from the lion hunt, she “…had reached forward and put her hand on Wilson’s shoulder. He turned and she had leaned forward over the low seat and kissed him on the mouth” (page 12, line 31-33). Margaret is all about pushing limits. She tries to awaken the wild and jealous side of Macomber, by kissing Wilson right in front of him and having sex with him. She is not happy in her marriage, but she does not want to leave her husband because of his money. Therefore she tries to change him, and make him more of a man, by provoking him to change.

The author enforces Tom as a character foil to Wilson to prove that Wilson is merely a piece of Tom’s game, who willingly and blindly places his faith on untrustworthy liabilities like the blue coupe. Critics like O’Meara identify Wilson and Gatsby as separate from Tom as she describes, “Wilson and Gatsby are indifferent ... but they make the mistake of seeing material possessions rather than themselves as the best means for attracting and keeping their women” (O’Meara). Unlike Gatsby’s motives that surround an unattainable dream, Wilson’s hopes are uncorrupt. By obtaining the blue coupe he is able to reimage himself to escape the harshness of the past. However, Myrtle's death instigates Wilson into a state beyond caring about the blue coupe and Tom heartlessly responds, “Wreck!” Said Tom. “That’s good. Willson’ll have a little business at last” (137). Unaware who was involved in the crash and unfazed by a possible death, the author reveals Tom’s insensitivity toward people as a whole. The fact that he perceives this event as benefiting Wilson, highlights his heartless nature and the author draws parallels between cars and

Francis reveals his lack of self-confidence and control over the situation. ?If he had been better with women she would probably have started to worry about him getting another new, beautiful wife but she knew too much about him to worry? (Hemingway). His lack of self-confidence has given her all the power in the relationship and it was a major contributing factor in her infidelity. Later on in the story, the growth of Francis?s confidence during the buffalo hunt and Margot?s displeasure with it is the final clue in determination of the death of Francis Macomber. The buffalo hunt gives Francis a new found sense of ?happiness?. This ?new wealth? of confidence is powerful for Francis and devastating for Margot . ?Fear gone like an operation. Something else grew in its place. Main thing a man had. Made him into man. Women knew it too. No bloody fear? (Hemingway). Margot knew at this point that if Francis survives the trip, he might possess enough personal strength and finally leave her, and that is what encourages her decision to kill him. At the end of the story Wilson confirms the reader?s suspicion when he reacts to the shooting by saying to Margot, ?That was a pretty thing to do? (Hemindway). That statement reinforces the belief that Margot was indeed taking advantage of the opportunity to ensure her long-term wealth and eliminate the possibility of being

Wilson. Men in the novel get away with being pigs. They do not think before certain actions and do not see that their actions do have repercussions