John Maynard Keynes was an economist instrumental in the theories that aided in the construction of the New Deal during the great depression. He believed that it was appropriate for government to use tax and spend policies in order to stimulate the government. He felt that by using this fiscal policy it would keep the country out of a recession or depression. Beings it is an election year, and the economy affects everyone in the country, I wanted to look into the Keynes theories and discover if it is necessarily a good economic choice. In reading a thesis written by Richard A. Epstein he states, “President Barack Obama may be in the thrall of Keynesian economics, or perhaps just captured by the labor unions. But either way, any move to a larger governmental role in planning or stimulating the economy is likely to make the current recession deeper and the recovery slower than they ought to be.[1] This statement was interesting to me because as a small business owner, I do not like the role that government plays in businesses. For instance, the rules, regulations and …show more content…
Sound institutions will boost confidence across the board and encourage investment so long as no one has to factor into the equation the huge levels of gratuitous uncertainty that stem from useless government intervention. We have to accept that external circumstances will create good and bad times. No economic theory can ward off hurricanes, disease, or war, even if sound social institutions can contain some of their adverse effects. But the purpose of government is not to eliminate all the uncertainties of nature and politics. It is to not add to the confusion by creating baroque structures of taxation, regulation, and government spending that add fresh layers of uncertainty through mechanisms that expend real resources in order to reduce social output.
The Great Depression brought many changes to the United States of Americas but the New Deal allowed for the protection of the entire nation. At first political leaders like Herbert Hoover, felt that the depression was only temporary and failed to comprehend the depth that the nation was in. Women and minorities began losing their jobs faster than men but soon when white men were walking down the streets searching for an opportunity. When Roosevelt took office in date he would address the depression head on; saving the nation from imploding from the many violent strikes and protest around the nation. When Roosevelt created the New Deal he created Governmental organizations and programs that would not only help the white male in urban areas but the entire nation.
FDR was to many people of that time a proactive, assertive, and brilliant president. He assembled a group of intelligent people to help create and implement changes in America known as the Brain Trust. (Shultz, 2014). Furthermore, in 1933 he established organizations, committees, safety nets in an attempt to prevent a depression ever occurring again. Moreover, the New Deal was developed and implemented, it expanded government control.
1. In the United States, the government has played an important role in production in several sectors, although its role is far more limited than in most other countries. Market failures provide an explanation for government intervention, but not an explanation for government production.
During my presidency, I established the New Deal which were a series of programs alphabetically so that people would have job and try to resolve the depression. The Program Civilian Conservation Corps would employ unmarried men to benefit the community into planting trees and plants, improving national parks, and building leeves. My most effective program was Social Security Act which benefited older age citizens who would go into retirement, but still have their insurance and welfare. Although my programs did help the economy, the Great Depression didn’t fully end until our involvement in World War II.
With the American general election cycle in full swing, one of the fundamental issues in play is the role of government. What is the place of Government? What should elected officials be doing? Do they simply protect personal liberties, or do they also establish safeguards and guidelines for various economic activities? Ask any two people and you’ll likely receive two different answers, so nuanced and complex is the issue. Policy can give incentives to business to act a certain way both domestically and abroad. Tax incentives in one region may cause a corporate to relocate (this happened to one of my favorite guitar manufacturers recently, as they moved production from Canada to California!). A central bank’s tweak in monetary policy to shift the cost of lending could ultimately move interest rates for consumers looking to take out mortgages or automobile loans. As we witnessed in 2008, the housing market is of international concern and a large central bank wields enormous power. While we like to call the Western economy a “free market,” there exists a multitude of government policies that impact the freedoms and movements of the economy, for better or for worse. I will present two specific examples of government economic intervention for your consideration, one that has helps economic activity and another that hurts it.
The 1930s, a time of great racial tension and segregation, is historically remembered for the Great Depression and President Roosevelt’s New Deal. Slavery had ended and the Ku Klux Klan started to become less popular; the struggle for African Americans, however, was not over. Racial segregation continued to thrive with half of African Americans out of work, their jobs given to whites who were struggling from the Great Depression (“Race During the Great Depression”). The New Deal, created to promote equality and produce jobs, was largely ineffective on the front of desegregation, doing little to help the black American community. One place that African Americans were able to prosper: jazz. However, even the jazz community itself was segregated. Racial prejudice came from both fronts: whites did “not want to mix socially with Negroes,” and black people believed that “when a Negro enters a White band, he loses his identity as a Negro musician” (“DownBeat Dodges the Racial Issue”). Benny Goodman, however, broke this barrier, initially in 1935 with the first interracial jazz performance, and again in his 1938 Carnegie Hall concert featuring black musicians.
“We could have enjoyed the benefits of higher growth and fuller employment” says Robert Kuttner in “Tax, Spend, and Thrive,” written in The American Prospect (Kuttner 1). Kuttner addresses issues that the government are not handling very well. Issues such as debt and unemployment. Kuttner gives ideas on how these problems might be fixed, and it all has to do with whether or not trusting the government with our hard earned money(Kuttner 1).
Currently, I feel that the United States public does not fully understand the economics behind American Government. I can reassure you that I was not aware of certain situations and outcomes could impact our entire economy. Macroeconomics has broaden my mind on how to efficiently operate a government’s economy, based on scientific theory and data. Expansion and recession will always be prevalent within a government. You cannot have one without the other. A government will learn from mistakes that cause a recession, which in turn will create expansion from learning past mistakes. There is always a way for efficient production and return. A government or company must please the public’s demands in order to create adequate profits and useful resources.
Hi Joshua, while I agree on the fact that the New Deal did exclude some groups of people such as tenants and women, I will have to disagree with your opinion that the New Deal did not live up to its promise. During the Great Depression, banks were failing and people could not get access to money. However, the New Deal recovered the banking system. While it is true that the New Deal did mainly benefit white males like you have mentioned, it is still important to note the many other accomplishments made through the New Deal. Franklin D. Roosevelt gave hope that helped many Americans through the Great Depression. Millions of jobs were created, and the creation of the Wagner Act influenced the growth of many labor movements. Even African Americans
Since the beginning of time people have been affected by their income and ability to accumulate wealth. People live their lives spending or saving money based on their own expectations of what the economy might do. For hundreds of years we have studied how the economic decisions of individuals and governments affect the welfare of society as a whole. John Maynard Keynes introduced a new economic theory that emphasized deficit spending to help struggling economies recover. Keynesian economics revolutionized the traditional thinking in the science of economics. His ideas and theories were deemed radical for his time but were later enacted by some of the largest governments in the world including the United States during the Great Depression. President Franklin Roosevelt enacted the New Deal in an attempt to stimulate the economy through government spending. In this paper I will be giving background to the history economics, the Great Depression, the New Deal, the development of Keynesian Economics. This paper will focus on analyzing the following question: In an attempt to address high unemployment and economic contraction, was Roosevelt’s The New Deal efficacious in stimulating the economy and ending the Great Depression?
The New Deal was a series of programs and policies made by President Franklin Delano
The New Deal Policies were created to give relief to the needy amid The Great Depression. Going in to presidency Franklin Roosevelt had no specific plan and had a “trial and error approach” to it. Although, after a hundred days in office Franklin Roosevelt constructed a three-pronged strategy; the relief program, recovery program, and the reform program. He intended to give relief to those who were in need. His strategies gave immediate jobs and also money to people who worked for certain “organizations”. In one policy money was given directly to states and cities, so they could work though and give to those who needed it the most. In the long run they helped the states start to get out of the Great Depression, but the economy was still struggling.
The term, The New Deal, comes from Franklin Roosevelt’s 1932 democratic presidential nomination acceptance speech, Roosevelt says, "I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people."(Referring to the great depression) Roosevelt explains the New Deal as a "use of the authority of government as an organized form of self-help for all classes and groups and sections of our country." The New Deal program was born in a Brain Trust meeting prior to Roosevelt’s inauguration. (Anonymous)
John Maynard Keynes is one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century yet one who is over looked. He was a political economist of extraordinary optimism and vision who believed that governments have the power to solve some the greatest economic issues. He didn’t believe in communism or in the free market he believed in a middle grown where increased monetary policy actions by the central bank and fiscal policy actions by the government, can actually help stabilize the economy and smooth out the peaks and troughs of which all economies are prone too. Keynes believed what held back countries was corruption, knee jerk policies and short slightness, but if they were the overcome these three ills then we could look forward to an age
Government involvement in a market economy is necessary only when the industry is systemically important to the overall functioning of the economy. These systemically important institutions, if default occurs, could threaten the economic system of America. These industries, including energy and banking require extensive government oversight in addition to intervention if needed. In many instances, little government involvement is beneficial to the market economy as it allows competitive forces to dictate operating results. The lack of government intervention, the private sector can handle many of the problems that occur within the industry in a process known as "creative destruction." If a large company defaults, then other private enterprise can better serve the market with products that are demanded. This occurs primarily through a lack of government intervention within the economy. For one, government involvement occasionally undermines the competitive climate of industry. Capitalism is predicated on innovation and profit motives to drive business results from a private perspective. Those who innovate should therefore be rewarded accordingly. With government intervention, this incentive is dramatically abated as firms are reluctant to innovate. However, in the case of systemically important institutions, government oversight is indeed needed to insure