preview

John Locke Separation Of Powers

Decent Essays

The framers had wanted something more cohesive and efficient way to fight the ambition of man and something better than the articles of confederation(Magleby 43). Made them turn to ”Montesquieu he advocated three distinct and separate branches in which the general powers of government should have been. While John Locke made a case for separating the legislative and executive powers, Montesquieu provided the Founders with a compelling defense for an independent judiciary” (Separation of powers). The founders wanted to make sure no one public official had too much power in turn the founders wanted them to observe having constitutional limits to their powers (Magbley 43). It made them want the separation of authority and having something to check …show more content…

So, in turn, the separation of powers separated into three governing entities legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judiciary branch. The legislature is responsible for making laws and making sure there is sufficient money to operate the government (An overview). The executive branch is responsible for the applying and running the public policy passed, and the legislature branch funds it(An Overview). “The judiciary branch is responsible for construing the constitution, laws and applying their interpretation to controversies brought be for it” (An Overview). The reason for the distribution among the three branches was to save the people from autocracy (Magleby 45).
The founding fathers wanted a system to have check and balance to avoid concentration of power. The system would give each branch the constitutional power to check the other branches (Magbley, 43). “Madison said it best “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Magbley43). The framers made a great decision in ensuring that a majority of the voters could win control over only a part of the government at a time (Magleby

Get Access