Competition Bikes Finical Analysis
Dan Petersen
WGU – JET2 Finical Analysis Task 4
A.
1.
To: Vice President
This report has been prepared to argue the case that the company’s current costing method should be changed to the activity based costing method. This report will review; the difference between traditional based costing and activity based costing; traditional split and allocations with activity based costing; and discusses the breakeven point for Competition bikes Inc. with regards to sales units and sales dollars for both CarbonLite and Titanium bikes.
The first item at hand is what kind of detail does activity based costing provide that is different than traditional costing?
The main difference between
…show more content…
From the overhead analysis completed, it analysis six overhead items with associated costs. This analysis also compares numbers from traditional based costing vs activity based costing. With traditional based costing the analysis shows a total product cost number of 641,320 for Titanium bikes, where as ABC method shows a total product cost as 590,715. There is a difference for Carbon bikes as well. The traditional method shows a 679,380 where the ABC method shows a total product cost of 729,985. These numbers show that Competition Bikes could be overpricing the titanium bikes and could afford to lower the cost in order to be more competitive in the marketplace and maybe even bring in more revenue than previous years. As for the Carbon bikes the analysis states that using the traditional method that total product cost was at 679,380. Once the same analysis for total product cost using ABC method for Carbon bikes shows that number to be 729,985. This knowledge gained from getting a better understanding of each bikes specific costs can really help price the product better so that Competition Bikes remains more competitive in the industry.
2.
1.
a. Analyze the breakeven point for Competition Bikes Inc. with regard to sales units and sales dollars for both CarbonLite and Titanium bikes. The cost volume profit (CVP) analysis is a tool that managers and business
With the release of the new budget for year 9 from Competition Bikes, there are a couple of areas that are a concern that warrant being addressed. The first being the prediction of amount of bikes to be sold; Competition Bikes is expecting 3,510 units to be sold after a year 8 that sold only 3,400 units which was a 15% drop in sales from the year prior (which sold approximately 4,000 units) with zero drop in price point which may make it harder for customers to justify purchasing a bike in the current economy. Understandably, year 8 was in the middle of a recession and the economy could rebound for a productive year 9. However, with only an extra $984 being spent on advertisement, the expectations could fall short unless
Competition Bikes, Incorporated (Inc.) makes bicycles for professional and other highly accomplished riders who compete in bike races, biathlons, and triathlons. Approximately sixty percent of all race winners have been victorious using bicycles designed by Competitions Bikes, Inc. This extraordinary success rate is a topic of conversation among racers and has led to exponential success for founder Larry Ferguson who formed the company in 2001 in his garage. Competition Bikes is known for quality products and is leader in the market with the CarbonLite
This analysis will evaluate the breakeven point for Competition Bikes Inc. Sales units and sales dollars will be identified for the breakeven point. These sales units and dollars will be broken down between CarbonLite and Titanium bikes.
The following is an analysis regarding if Competition Bikes Incorporated should change its traditional costing method to activity based costing (ABC). This consideration is being given because the organization is changing its sales strategy in the San Diego plant to produce 9 Titanium bikes for every 5 CarbonLite bikes, and there are indications that manufacturing will experience a 10% increase due to new environmental regulations.
Glaser Health Products manufactures medical items for the health care industry. Production involves machining, assembly and painting. Finished units are then packed and shipped. The financial controller is interested to introduce an activity-based costing (ABC) system to allocate (or distribute) indirect costs to products. Indirect costs, as distinct from direct costs, cannot be unambiguously linked to specific products. The controller would like to calculate product costs based on ABC for planning and control, not inventory valuation.
Going into 2004, Bob Moyer planned to produce 10,000 bicycles at Mile High Cycles. Construction of his bicycles includes the utilization of three departments, frames, wheel assembly, and final assembly. During this year, Mile High Cycles ended up actually producing 10,800 bicycles to meet higher than expected demand. Bob is curious as to whether or not he was successful in maintaining costs to meet these higher levels of demand.
Develop and diagram an activity based cost model using the information in the case. Provide your best estimates about the cost and profitability of Wilkerson’s three product lines. What difference does your cost assignment have on reported product costs and profitability? What causes any shifts in cost and profitability?
Schwinn Bicycles is a long lasting and reputable manufacturer of bicycles, which has revealed a rather tumultuous history. The company has even been on the verge of bankruptcy, but has managed to overcome this challenge. Today, the organization is part of the Pacific Cycle Inc., which means that its particular data are difficult to retrieve and separate from those of the parent group.
Nowadays, we know that activity based costing system assigns overhead costs to products or services products that using a two-stage process, which focuses on activities. ABC is a relatively new and very important topic in managerial accounting. ABC allows us to find a way that we could determine the profitability of every product, profitability of every customer we serve, and the profitability of our process. Contents in brief, first that comparing potential advantages of ABC versus traditional costing methods. The
Activity-based management, activity-based costing and continuous improvement, all these help in the improvement of the efficiency in manufacturing, better control of overhead costs and the accurate costing of products. With this in mind, We disagree with the advice that Chuck Davis, the firm’s controller, gave Leonard Bryner. The traditional way of costing produce average costs that severely overstated or understated. Without the accurate costs, the firm would not be able to price properly their products and that would be damaging to the firm. With activity-based costing and management, all costs are accounted for with the help activity-drivers and overhead costs are decreased. In turn, the costs that the firm has for their products are more accurate and pricing is much easier.
We will examine the given data from the case and compare the unit costs from the company’s current costing system (traditional costing) and from activity-based costing. We will also highlight other qualitative data in consideration with the numerical factors that may result to a significant change on our recommendation.
After analyzing three different costing methods for Caprock Cycle Company, we have made some observations and gathered some suggestions concerning the profitability of Bryan’s company. Process costing, job costing, and activity-based costing are the three methods we used to compare profitability for Caprock Cycle Company.
Numerous articles have been written about Activity-Based costing (ABC) system since it was first introduced back in mid 1980’s. It was generally characterized as the only costing system that could accurately depict and represent product cost in a highly relative complex and complicated business environment. Combined with Activity-Based Management (ABM), ABC aligns the company’s strategic objectives with its product costing system as it distinguishes non-value added activities and determines areas where costs can be possibility reduced (Hughes & Gjerde, 2003).
Similarly, Pirttila and Hautaniemi (1995) also proposed 5 steps in analyzing activity-based cost but different in some detail, which started with scoping interest, analyzing flow of raw material, specifying and analyzing resource and activity, selecting cost drive, and calculating cost of each activity [27].
Activity-based costing, or ABC, is defined as “a total quality management tool for cost and performance measurement of activities, resources, and cost object” (Narong 12). Activity-based costing allows business to accumulate information and data about operating costs of the company. Three things made this popular in the 1980s. First, it “eliminated the product cross subsidies inherent in cost accounting. Then, it revealed the sources of loss that were responsible for the decline in profitability. Third, it acted as a catalyst for decisions affecting profitability” (Turney 4). Activity-based costing allows firms activities to be identified. After the activities are identified, products are then assigned different indirect costs. Activity-based costing is sometimes referred to as horizontal or cross functional cost view. It provides