preview

Jacobus Arminius And John Calvin: A Comparative Analysis

Decent Essays

Hendrikus Berkhof's definition of dogma states, "a doctrine, derived from Scripture, officially defined by the Church, and declared to rest upon divine authority" (Enns 2014, 505). Denominations, churches, and ministries will often post their doctrine online to describe their core beliefs. Published doctrine is helpful and important as it binds and anchors a community of believers around a set of strongly considered beliefs based on Scripture and developed in a systematic way.
Additionally, if someone is considering attending the service of a particular Church, a review of the denomination or church doctrine will help them understand the basic tenets of the faith. Furthermore, these details matter if you should decide to attend or join a church because it can strongly influence and inform the faith of you and your family.
To compare some differences, let’s focus on the two dogmatic theologies of Jacobus Arminius and John Calvin. On the topic of election, according to Arminian theology, “Election is conditional, based on man’s response to faith” (Enns 2014, 525). Alternatively, according to Calvinism theology, election is not based on man’s response, but God’s selection from eternity past (Ibid.)
Let’s now focus on the doctrinal differences of two major Christian denominations, the Roman …show more content…

And regarding the possibility of public, negative discussion, we are called to be in the world, not of the world. We will face challenges to our faith, including the doctrines we might publically post describing it. “If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.” (John 15:19 ESV). We press forward, able to defend our faith as we are called to do in 1 Peter 3:15, “…always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in

Get Access