Who is this Isaac Parker that a lot of people don’t know about? Why was his nickname “the hanging judge”? Where did he live before he was the judge in Fort Smith, Arkansas? It is time to learn who this man was and why he became who he was. Isaac Charles Parker was born in a log cabin Barnesville, Belmont County, Ohio on October 15,1838. He was the youngest son of Joseph and Jane Parker, and was the great-nephew of Governor Wilson Shannon. Joseph was a plain, old farmer in Ohio while Jane was known for her strong mental qualities, business habits, and was active in the Methodist church. Parker attributed his success to the way he was raised,especially in connection with his mother. Isaac worked on the farm with his family. He didn’t really care about working outdoors. He attended the Breeze Hill primary school and then the Barnesville Classical Institute. To be able to pay for his higher education, he taught students in a country primary school. In 1859, Isaac became an apprentice to an Barnesville lawyer. While he was an apprentice, he pass the Ohio Bar exam and married Mary O’Toole. They were married on December …show more content…
They name their son James Joseph Parker. Their third son died in infancy. Isaac urge the government to give Fort Smith’s 300-acre of military reservation to help fund the public school system. In 1884, the government gave Isaac the military reservation to the city of Fort Smith. In Arkansas and the territory of Oklahoma, it is rumored that the town folks of the time would say, “ There is no Sunday west of St. Louis-no God west of Fort Smith.” The number of how many people Isaac hung will never be known. Some say that it is 78 to 80 people, others say it was more than hundred. He heard thousands and thousands of criminal complaints about almost everything. Some of the complaints every had disputes and violence between the Indians and the white
In 1987 Edward Dewey Smith, a man previously convicted for several drug related offences, was caught crossing the Canadian border in return from Bolivia with several ounces of cocaine. He was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment under the Narcotics Control Act which has a minimum requirement of 7 years if drugs are caught being imported into Canada. It was brought into question whether or not this minimum sentence under section 5(2) of the Narcotics Control Act conflicted with section 7,9 and 12 of the Charter. In conclusion, the court decided that the minimal seven year sentence was in fact not cruel and unusual punishment. The definition for cruel and unusual punishment in the charter is punishment that causes outrage by the public and
Living distinct lives in the New World, two American authors present striking pictures of their struggles in the land of opportunity. Samuel Sewall’s and William Byrd II’s diaries provide a glimpse into the everyday routines of early American settlers. An accomplished judge, businessman, and printer of Massachusetts Bay, Sewall writes about the developments around him. Likewise, Byrd, a successful planter, slave-owner, and author from Charles City County, Virginia, leaves valuable information concerning his routines in his diary. Even though these two men share the same nation, coastland, and English heritage, their stories are remarkably unique.
The principal representation of truth in ‘The Trials of Oz’ is Robertson’s detailed presentation of the initial courtroom battle, including lengthy
“Like So many things its is not what's outside, but what is inside that counts,” This quote comes the movie Aladdin and it is represented in many things, simple, and complex. The quote comes from the merchant and the quote describes the theme as when an individual gains enough “greed”, they disguise themselves in order to gain their desire, and can be used to describe evil and good, just like lucifer, he was in disguise of an angel but his true motives came up and down he fell, or the soldiers fighting for us, on the outside they look like the average joe but they have seen things you can't even handle and they do it for our country. This is true for all three works in the essay, in two of the the works the greed is used for evil and in one the greed is used for good. In the first work of art, Scarlet letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, we see an antagonist named Roger Chillingworth try to seek revenge on the protagonists lover. Roger seeks revenge on the protagonist, Hester Prynee, because the protagonist is his wife and she committed adultery. In the novel Scarlet letter it begins with a lecher on top of a scaffold with a baby in her arms, it is revealed that she is an adulterer. She committed adultery while her husband was away on a trip, and while she is on the scaffold she notices him in the crowd. There are ministers who try to get the name of the father but Hester refuses to reveal his name. She goes on a journey of trying to keep the father hidden and wear the burden
Abraham Lincoln is best known for his great speeches and his role in the civil war, but what most people do not know is how he and his wife met and what effect her family had on his presidency. In Stephen Berry’s book House of Abraham: Lincoln and the Todds, a Family Divided By War, Berry tells about the life of Abraham and his wife Mary Todd. In this book, he includes the influence that the Todd family had played on his personal life as well as his presidency. This book begins with Mary Todd’s grandfather and eventually he ends with Lincoln’s assassination. The main focus of the author is to give the reader a better understanding of the Todd clan, and also to understand what it was like to be apart of the family. The content of the book allows for people to go into the mind of the Todd family. After reading this book, it is easy to see why Abraham had such a difficult time with the Civil War not just because he was president, but also because his wife’s family was split by it.
The next theme we will talk about will be cleverness. Mr. Parker was so clever that he could easily avoid authority as well as slave owners and even managed to convince a widow to purchase him from his master for $1,800 and was able to purchase his freedom from the widow in just 18 months by working in the iron foundry. John Parker was a very brilliant and clever man that lived a double life. By day he would work as an iron molder and by night he would take slaves across the Ohio River. He was a brilliant inventor with patents to a sugar mill, tobacco press, and soil pulverizer. Parker was a terrific businessman also. He was the owner of a foundry and blacksmith shop at a time when many black businesses were failing.
Parker’s court was unusual until 1889. He became a lawyer in 1859. The Indian courts only involved Indians and Indian Territory have their own courts. Isaac moved to St. Joseph, Missouri to work in his uncle’s law firm. So many deaths he handed down during his 21 year as a federal justice. The District Court career Parker had, 79 people were hanged. The court has jurisdiction over the western counties of Arkansas and all of the Indian Territory. The District Court tried cases that arose between Indians and non Indians. The huge Indian reservation that covered what is now Oklahoma. In 1889, congress approved laws that allowed the Supreme Court of the U.S. to review Fort Smith death-penalty cases. The same year, a federal court system was established
Despite the cultural differences I learned a lot about Rowlandson and Franklin’s time. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin was not an easy book to read. Benjamin Franklin was a remarkable man. He was a printer, author, politician and an inventor (PECO). Because of Franklins, this essay is being written about one of the men responsible for America’s success today. The captivity narratives of Rowlandson served to define goodness and women's proper devotion to their religion, and to give a religious message about the value of faith in times of harsh conditions. The belief of Rowlandson and Franklin in God did help to form our
In 1875, a late winter twister has ripped open a hidden mass grave. As Sheriff Jake Watts attempts to solve the mystery the bones conceal, a crazed killer has come to town to seek vengeance.
John Proctor tried his hardest and went through hell and gave his life to try to save the people of his town in Salem. “ I am only wondering how i may prove what she told me Elizabeth. If the girl's a saint now; I think it not easy to prove she's a fraud the town gone silly., she told me in a room alone, I have no proof for it” (2.127-131). My explanation is by him saying that he means its going to be hard to prove Elizabeth Proctor is guilty and they are going to find out it's a lie. I connected to this because John and his wife are innocent and she never tells a lie, also they can't even prove that they are lying even if they were. Joth talked to Hale about the situation when Hale came to John's home in the middle of the night to ask questions.
Samuel Parris has a long and eventful history that shaped his views and actions while he was preaching in Salem Village. At the age of 20 Parris inharated his fathers sugar plantation in Barbados while he was attending Harvard (Linder “Parris” Par1). The wealth that Parris had accumulated while in Barbados was sufficient enough to support him and his new family when he moved to Boston (Par.2). Unhappy with his life as a merchant Parris decided that it was time for a change in his vocation. In 1691 he began to substitute for absent ministers and speaking at informal church gatherings (Par.3). After the birth of his third child with his wife Elizabeth Eldridge, Parris began to have formal negotiations to become the preacher for Salem Village (Par.3). The marriage of Parris and Eldridge linked him to
If this quote had been written by one of Smith's fellow settlers, we may regard it as substantial evidence. However, it was written by Smith, so he seems to be boasting about his selflessness and leadership ability. Furthermore, according to Egloff and Chief Crazy Horse, Smith did not even mention his attempted murder to his fellow settlers when he returned to the fort after the Indians released him. Furthermore, he did not include the incident in an account of his captivity, which he wrote immediately following his period of captivity (Vincent 1; Chief Crazy Horse 1). Thus, Smith's General History is not reliable.
Another cunning piece of evidence was the bloody glove found behind Nicole's house, that had fit O.J.'s hand and supposedly had blood in it, but when it was time to call the glove as evidence in the court room, there was no blood. This leads us into question about whether or not racism played a role in the lengthiest trial in United States history. With the help of a strong team of forensic experts, the lawyers were able to identify irregularities in the conduct of the investigation by LAPD detectives and forensic specialists. For example, one of the detectives Philip Vannatter, had carried a sample of Simpson's around with him for hours: and some of the blood taken from Simpson was unaccounted for. After much investigation, the defense team found evidence that Mark Fuhrman, the detective who allegedly found the bloody glove in Simpson's yard, was a raving racist who, contrary to his claim on the stand, frequently used the word “nigger” and had bragged about framing blacks, especially those involved
March 25, 1931, nine men hopped on to a freight train of no return (Uschan 10). Unjust, prejudice, and racist the Scottsboro Trials, were definitely not just another ordinary case. The Scottsboro Trials changed how America viewed segregation. The nine young men, who hopped onto that train that day, were innocent and harmless. The Scottsboro Trials revealed the unjust treatment that African Americans faced outside of the Harlem Renaissance and changed views on segregation.
Benjamin Franklin’s life is one any great founding father can be immensely proud of. Franklin implemented himself in the history books through his successful work as a printer and publisher for the Pennsylvania Gazette, through the founding of a hospital and academy for the youth in Philadelphia, and through his contributions to the creation of an enduring class system in America. Franklin’s most important contribution to this class system was his claim that the driving forces of social development had little to do with religion or morality, but rather the people’s desire to roam and move forward. Isenberg builds this argument off Franklin’s portrayal of Miss Polly Baker, a character in which births five metaphorically, healthy children.