Is The Electoral College Necessary Today

The Electoral College was first introduced to America at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, However, the idea behind the Electoral College can be traced back to the Roman

The Electoral College was instituted by our founding fathers as an agreement for the Presidential voting procedure. Once the compromise was agreed upon the system was written into Article II, Section 1 under the 23rd Amendment of the United States Constitution on September 8, 1787. (Constitution.laws.com, 2018) Generally, it was formed for the buffer among the populations of the Presidential election and as a portion of the governmental structure that allocates additional power to the much smaller states, which assists with the voting processes by offering them support.

First and foremost, it grants minor states the power they need to make a difference. Instead of a popular vote, the electoral college divides it’s 538 electors amongst states by population. Moreover, to ensure this counter-idea, 3 supplementary votes are awarded to each state. This insures that states like Wyoming or Vermont are not neglected over immenser sates like Texas or California; authorizing there interests and needs to be just as significant. Hans Hassel, a politics professor, once stated the following, “The Electoral College really provides an option for people in states like Iowa to make a difference, and, as an Iowan, I think that’s important.” Likewise, when Raul Labrador was questioned about the efficiency and quality of electoral

One reason the Electoral College should not be abolished is that it was originally part of the framers plan for America. We know this, because a few years after the constitution was founded, the Constitutional Convention came together to decide a leader, as it was obvious that one was necessary. They also knew that the leader must be chosen in an informed fashion that would equally represent everyone. In the end, the electoral system was chosen because it was an indirect way of choosing the president and Vice President and in the end, "The delegates settled on a system involving an Electoral College." (BGE). These examples shows that the Electoral College should be kept in modern day government because it was chosen by the people who founded

According to Archives. Gov, the Founding Fathers created the Electoral College or “Electors” as it’s originally stated in the constitution, as a way to elect the President and the Vice President of the United States. Alexander Hamilton, one of the Founding Fathers has made up this system of Electors as an easier way to vote for the presidential office.

The electoral college system is unnecessary at this point in time. When the electoral college system was thought up in the 1700s by the framers of the constitution, they believed that electors to represent the peoples’ vote would be more efficient since it was extremely difficult to get information to and from places quickly, meaning that citizens would be late on news. To to combat that, the framers created the electoral college system, a system where electors elected by a political party would represent the peoples’ vote, gather in Washington, and vote on their behalf. Because of the lack of technology, this method wasn’t a bad way to vote for presidents efficiently. But technology improved, negating the problem of Americans not knowing the news in Washington and concerning their candidates. Today, Americans have access to current and reliable news regarding their candidates and are generally up-to-date with politics. So with the technological advances present today, why do we still employ an electoral college to vote for our next president? There isn’t a pressing reason to keep it.

Your vote should mainly matter! Yes, the electoral college should be abolished. The delegates did not believe the president should be chosen by a direct population vote (of the people). They didn’t trust voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College is where the president and vice president are chosen indirectly. This system is where all states and the District of Columbia get one electoral vote for each of their US senators and representatives. Also, each state has a slate of electors for each presidential candidate. Another way this system works is by winner-take all method. The winner-take all method is where whichever candidate wins the most votes in the state, wins the state electoral votes. Lastly a candidate must receive a majority (one more than a half) of the electoral votes to be declared president. That is how everything goes in the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because 12 states and D.C. total have double the amount of electoral votes but less people than Illinois. Also, the winner of the 1876 presidential election isn’t what people wanted, it was based on the number of electoral votes. Another reason the electoral college should be abolished is that the states with the same representatives dont have the same number of voters. All these issues that continue to happen, need to be resolved by getting rid of this system.

The electoral college was established from the Constitution. When the Framers had gathered to make the Constitution, James Wilson from Pennsylvania had proposed direct elections. James Madison, however, opposed to direct elections in fear that it would put the south at a disadvantage by being outnumbered by the north’s population. This lead the Framers into creating

The electoral college is a system that was put in place by the framers of the constitution for many reasons. The main reason the electoral college is that the framers did not fully trust democracy for they believed that people were not educated enough to vote. After reading an article from Business Insider called The Electoral College Is Brilliant, And We Would Be Insane To Abolish It by Walter Hickey, I agree that the electoral college is necessary for our presidential elections. According to the article the electoral college is good because it keeps errors local, is a testament to a candidate's desire to win, and most importantly, forces majority. In the article opposing the Electoral College I found many of the arguments to be invalid or full of what ifs or buts, and that is why I do not have any reason to believe the electoral college is good.

The electoral College was developed at the first constitutional convention in 1787 by James Wilson. The idea of the electoral college was influenced by how Rome would elect the Pope around the same time. During the Constitutional Convention they bounced around several ideas on which way would be most effective to elect a president. The number of electors was dependent upon the number of people in that states senate, (will always be 2) and the number of the people that state had in the House, (which fluctuates every decade depending on that states census.) Choosing the electors was left up to the state, but to avoid the college choosing a “favorite” they had to cast two votes, one of which had to be for someone out of their home state. The electoral college was originally designed for use without political parties and without national campaigns,both of which we have today. While the electoral college was a good system for the original thirteen states it was developed for, there needs to be a better or more direct way to elect a president of the united states.

the framers of the constitution debated many options for determining how the President of the

Edgar Allan Poe is a well-known fixture in American literature; whose stories have made sizeable contributions to the Gothic literary element. Many of Poe’s stories contain more than one Gothic element. “The Fall of the House of Usher” is a prime example of this. In this story Poe presents the themes of death and the accompanying supernatural. Poe often uses his proficiency in Gothic to invoke deep reading. For many, this proficiency causes Poe’s stories to be difficult to fully understand at first glance.

Within The Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius, Lady Philosophy tries to convince Boethius that the benefits of misfortune far outweigh the pseudo benefits of good fortune; I believe her argument is valid. Misfortune helps us appreciate happiness while good fortune leads us to the false preconceived idea of happiness. Whereas many believe that good fortune is rad, Lady Philosophy sees misfortune as the better of the two; eventually leading us to the true good. Misfortune provides us the opportunity to gain greater knowledge, while good fortune seemingly distracts us from what we truly need to focus on.            Lady Philosophy claims that “Good fortune deceives, adverse fortune teaches,” (Boethius 40) while Lady Philosophy views good fortune as misleading and

The Electoral College gained its origins when our countries fore fathers gathered at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and began brainstorming on different methods to elect a President. The Electoral College at the time was created to be a

Nemo and his friends swim to the edge of the reef in the scene, “Swimming out to Sea” from the movie, Finding Nemo. The friends see boat in the distance, they call a butt. Nemo’s friends dare him to swim out to touch the boat. But before Nemo can his dad, Marlin, shows up and scolds him for attempting to swim out into open water. The teacher, hearing the scolding, then asks Marlin if he can help. As they are talking, Nemo swims out into open water and touches the boat with confidence. After completing the dare, he began to swim back to his friends. As he is swimming back, a diver from the boat captures Nemo and snaps a picture of Marlin. Marlin disoriented from the flash of the camera, swims madly toward the boat to help his son, but his efforts