Really Testing, Really
•Children are _noOearnipg, according to staRdardized testing scotos.•Theidea of standardizee testingistogivetourchildlenthe best education possible; but there aremany di fferent ideas as to
should beaccomplished. The problem with standardized testing is that it makes teachers
have to teach the matctial faster, which is very stressful for kids, and sometimes have questions that aren't completely a part ofthe standard.
•Some,schoolsuse diplomas as both a way ofbribing and threatening students to do
•standardized tests.Not only is this stressful, but it could mentally huff a student. The lack of.
motivation to learn is what ruins the joy of learning for children. Children do notenjOy learning
being taught that the
…show more content…
One source states, "while using student test scores to rate teachers may seem intuitive, researchers say it actually
flies in the face of the evidence: Decades of data indicates that better results come not from hiring innately better teachers, but from helping them improve through constant training and
feedback. Perhaps that's why no other nation in the world uses annual, standardized tests to set teacher salaries" (RIZGA 42). Teachers Who teach in poor areas are pressured even more to have an education, covering only areas which are tested, SO that the schoolsvill receive mor9money and less teaching in the understanding of the standards. Qn thiS topic; Alfie Kohn,aformerj educator and opponent of standardized testing, states that "the altofteaching is being destroyed by those who mistakenlybelieve that teaching children how t&léam is not as important
…show more content…
This has an effect on learning similar to the effect that a noose has on breathing"(A
Look At).
Standardized testing is the most abundant method of testing. Tests such as the CAT, MAT, and SAT were not designed to measure teaching or learning. They were designed in such a way
that only one half of the students would answer correctly, resulting in a wide range of scores. Kohn asserts that "The main objective of these tests is to rank, not to rate; to spread out the scores, not to gauge the quality of a given student or school" (A look at);
Ä7urther arguing the case against standardized testing is the fact that these tests are biasec!.
Research shows that white children who live in affluent areas tend to score the highest on the. tests; This does not mean that these children are any more or less intelligent than others. Many experts believe that this is due largely to two reasons: the first reason being that English is usually the only language that is spoken by these children, so they don't have to focus on
These standardized tests are used by schools because they find that it is an easy way to test a student’s ability. However, the
Standardized tests inhibit the ability for students to perform well on stress inducing tests; thus, students question their abilities to succeed, and they lack engagement in their educational learning. Standardized tests produce the feeling of anxiety as heart beats accelerate, bodies’ tremble, faces flush, sweat pores open, hands grip tighter, and muscles tense. As the test dates come closer, students are
Although standardized testing has been a major part of schooling it has also had a negative impact on effective education. Standardized has made a huge impact on public schooling so much that not only does it affect the students but also the teachers. With the teachers now beginning to get raises or having their jobs on the line if their students fail the test, many students have not been getting the fullest education process that they could get. Students may not realize the impact that it has had on the type of teaching style that they receive because they are so used to it. With so many teachers not having a lot of time to teach what is on the test and the other things that they feel are important to students to know, a lot of
Standardized tests are often unfair to a wide range of students. Students coming from high-poverty schools often have fewer resources and weaker teachers (Layton A1). “People are sick of the overkill of test volume and the consequences, ridiculous things like rating art teachers based on the reading test scores in their schools” quote Robert Schaeffer (Layton A1). “Fort Myers, Florida, gives 183 tests during the year!” quote Sen. Patty Murray (Layton A1). There is many ways students can be evaluated more
The stress settled in once the word ‘testing’ echoed through the classroom. The students knew what it brought, and they knew how dreadful it would be; sitting in one room, hour after hour and day after day, silent and still, with only the sound of the clock resonating through their heads. Standardized tests are assessments that local and national governments may require their students to take. However, these tests do not properly evaluate their intellect, and only lead to tension and mental strain on a student’s attentiveness. Although many schools believe that these assessments are productive, it is proven that they are not beneficial to students because standardized testing leads to stress and anxiety, it is wasting valuable classroom time,
A main issue why you cannot judge a teacher based off their students test scores is because some factors are out of their control. In any classroom across the world there are some students who are smarter than others. (Popham 13) Some can be excellent at math, while others can exceed in science. (Popham 13) A teacher can give over a lesson in a clear and succinct way but there will always be students who do not do well. (Popham 13) Recent thinking among leading educators suggest that there are various forms of intelligence, and a child who is born with less classroom skills may possess other abilities that will not be shown by a test. (Popham 13) For a student as such, a teacher is limited in finding a successful approach to help them gain a high test score.
But, a standardized test does not do either accurately. Studies conducted in the past decade have shown discrepancies in the evaluation of teachers. For example, in a September 2010 report made by the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, they tested the same students, teachers, subjects, during the same time of year, but used two different tests. Over 17% of Houston teachers that were ranked at the top of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills reading tests were ranked among the lowest two categories on the Stanford Achievement Tests. Even with the top teachers, there are many different factors that contribute to a student’s performance on a standardized tests. And measuring a student’s achievement using tests given in only a small piece of the school year cannot give the whole picture of a student’s education. Also, out-of-school factors contribute greatly to a student’s performance, such as race, class, disabilities, and knowledge on the English language. In fact, researchers calculated that a teacher’s influence on student test scores ranges from 1% to 14%. Then, why are we still evaluating teachers using standardized tests? If standardized tests do not even do the job they were supposed to do, then it is not an effective way of improving the education of Americans
This is largely contributed to the fact that graders “don’t need experience in grading tests” (Svaldi). This means that anyone with a degree in anything can grade your high stakes test for a little extra money. Graders with no experience grading very high stakes tests creates an obvious loss of credibility in the scores attached to those tests.Another issue that arises is that many standardized test now use onestandard rubric to grade many differenttest; however, rubrics can be subjective especiallywhen “scores… [are] summed, averaged, and transformed into a grade“(Cooper and Gargan). This shows how unfair the use of rubrics isbecause they allow the interpreter of the rubric to be too opinionated or biases. It also argues that the use of rubrics should banned from writing test because they take away from
Standardized testing is very high in costs and is not actually needed (Jouriles). Most teachers can already
There are many different types of standardized tests used in schools around the country, but “high-stakes” achievement tests in US elementary and secondary schools have produced
Accountability testing tends to be very deceptive. Schools are required to teach under a specific curriculum, but there are schools who are unable to afford the items necessary to
Ever since then standardized testing has been a huge part of education. Teachers across the nation had to teach to the curriculum instead of what they thought the students needed to learn. Nowadays colleges strictly look at ACT and SAT scores rather than classroom grades, because they believe that some teachers grade on a curve and are not giving the students a fair chance. Standardized tests are an unreliable measure of student performance. A 2001 study published by the Brookings Institution found that 50-80% of year-over-year tests core improvements were temporary and “caused by fluctuations that had nothing to do with long-term changes in learning…”(“Standardized Tests”). Teachers are stressed over if they are teaching “correctly”. They went to a 4-year college, some even more, to get a degree in something that they wanted to do, either for themselves or for the children, and now they have to “teach to the test”. Tests can only measure a portion of the goals of education. A pschometrician, Daniel Koretz says, “standardized tests usually do not provide a direct and complete measure of educational achievement.”(Harris, Harris, and Smith).
Standardized testing creates a lot of stress on students and educators alike. Because of how much stress is put on them to prepare students for these tests, many excellent teachers quit their jobs everyday. In fact, in April, new federal data stated that 17 percent of new public school teachers leave their profession after four years due to stress and other reasons. Some teachers fail to teach students skills that go beyond the tests because they’re so pressured to get their students ready for these exams. This amount of stress can lead to feelings of negativity towards school and learning in general as well as cause negative health issues. Standardized tests places a large amount of stress on both teachers and students.
Standardized tests take away from a teacher’s flexibility and creativity. With that in mind, teachers do not fit into the same mold either. Each teacher has their own style of teaching and should be given the flexibility to teach in a way that will inspire their students. Teachers are not able to be as creative in their teaching styles, when focused on test preparation. Many talented teachers leave the field of education when they lose the freedom to teach their own way. Teaching has gone from a creative art to a structured implementation as the focus shifts to standardized tests.
The debate on standardized tests and its adequacy in testing a student’s knowledge about a subject has been going on for many years. Tests, in general, has been around for centuries and without them there would not be progress and no gleams of progress. Students ranging from elementary school to high school have experienced standardized testing. Teachers, educators, and parents are also involved in the students’ lives, which revolves around the tests, one way or another. There are many views on standardized test. However, the three most common views are: educators who are for standardized test which benefits students, educators who are at the other extreme of opposing standardized tests, and educators who view tests are a benefit if done in appropriate amounts.