IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ADAMS COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN CONSTANCE WOLF, f/k/a CONSTANCE WOLFGRAM Plaintiff, v. INTERROGATORIES Civil Action No. ________ LEWIS E. OLSON ALBERT DOBIASH (Note Send the Interrogatories separate) Defendants. In accordance with Rules _____________________________ of the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedures, Plaintiff requires that you answer the following Interrogatories in writing and under oath. DEFINITIONS As used herein below, the following words have the meaning hereafter set forth: 1. “Defendant”, “you”, and “your” refer to the party or parties to whom these Interrogatories are directed and all other persons acting on behalf of such party, including, but not limited to, …show more content…
1. Please identify the person or persons responding to these Interrogatories on behalf of the Defendant, and identify each person who has provided information in connection with these Interrogatories. 2. Identify any person not already named as a party to this lawsuit whom you contend caused or contributed to the occurrence complained of, including any architect, engineer, designer, contractor, subcontractor or others. 3. Identify each person (excluding your attorney) who provided you with information which enabled you to respond to this Interrogatory. 4. Identify the number of years you have been a licensed home inspector. 5. Please describe and provide documents that identify licenses that you presently hold (Real Estate, trades, mold, termite, thermography). 6. Provide a list of past customers who have used your home inspection services. 7. Identify your construction background and how are you formerly educated in construction sciences. 8. Identify and provide your membership of any related professional associations relating to home inspection and/or construction. 9. Identify and provide your credentials as a published writer or a speaker to establish credibility as a home inspector. 10. Provide information to show
Applicant’s attorney, Mr. Juan Vera, appeared representing the applicant’s interest. Court reporting duties were provided by Ms. Elizabeth Maeyama, License No. 12060. Interpreting services were provided by Ms. Berta ZeFrench, Certification No. 36353581. The deposition started at approximately 2:24 p.m. and lasted until 3:15 p.m. The applicant testified that she arrived at applicant’s attorney’s office at 1:00 p.m. to prepare for her deposition; therefore, I anticipate applicant’s attorney’s office’s §5710 invoice to be for no more than two hours and 15 minutes. I will make a more specific recommendation regarding the yet to
Complainant Dusenberry further stated that Investigator Higgins did not interview Witnesses Marisol Molina, Bernadette Talamantez, or Gibert Acquilar. Instead, Investigator Higgins interviewed “people in Respondent Evers’ inner circle.” Who are Diana Chavez and Denise Boles. Complainant Dusenberry stated that Investigator Higgins interviewed people who would not know how she feels and about her harassment.
Please state your full name, home address, each address at which you have resided for the past five (5) years, social security number, date of birth, marital status and your employer's name and address.
On June 22, 2016, your affiant spoke with the complainant via phone and she confirmed the facts of the case and provided your affiant with the defendant’s name and date of birth. Your
Defendant’s Statement: When asked about the offense, Da’Shaun reported he did not start his day planning to be involved in a burglary. He reported he was walking home with the codefendant who suggested that the pair get into something. Da’Shaun reported he was going to be the lookout, and he did not want anything from the home. Da’Shaun also reported feeling bad for the victims and ashamed.
Interrogatory No. 7: Do you admit that the scope of Tappe Construction’s work at the Cedar 28 building was limited to wood frame carpentry? If you do not admit this unequivocally, identify and describe in all possible detail the factual basis for your failure to admit; identify each person who will testify to this and identify and describe all documents relied upon to support your
Describe what the fundamental issue(s) were that formed the basis of this case from the point of view of the plaintiffs. For this assignment, please discuss this in humanistic terms – not legal technicalities – so that we may understand the dynamics that led L. C. and E. W. and their advocates to seek legal remedy in the first place.
1. Based on the information you have gathered during your first task, what discrepancies/irregularities exist in Shawn Davidson’s file?
1. The witness has first had an opportunity to explain or deny it and counsel for the other parties have had an opportunity to ask about it, and
The parties involved; Mrs. Bieber (appellant’s mother), Mr. Gary Lee Cassidy (the appellant), and the two officers.
Location of Interview: My partner and I will interview the suspect, Gavoni, at the procurement building in a traditional office setup. We will clearly communicate with his Supervisor, Carl Rodgers, and request an office to use. We will ask Rodgers not to tell Gavoni anything about the situation. After we arrive and preset the office space to our liking we will call Rodgers and request that he tell Gavoni to report to the designated office immediately and fully cooperate. We don’t want Gavoni to know about the suspect interview until the moment he walks into the designated office. This
2- Where, when, and how did you obtain your qualifications to become a home inspector?
There are three options available to address the request made by the Mr. McIntosh to be a character witness in his trial. The first option is to inform Mr. McIntosh that unfortunately I will not be able to honor his request to be a character witness. The second option is to inform Mr. McIntosh that I will be a character witness, but I can only do so by writing a letter to the court. The third option is to inform Mr. McIntosh I will honor his request to be present in person, but in accordance to the advice, I have received from my legal department and my GS at DHQ.
to submit material evidence that the alleged incident actually happened at the time and place stated in Plaintiff’s sworn Affidavit, January 28, 2016;
3. After interviewing the victim of a crime and two witnesses, and examining the crime scene and the physical evidence, you use all of this information as a basis for developing a unifying and