The world is full of millions of people who simply surf the web at their own will, checking their e-mail or even going on social networking sites. In Australia, however, this Internet freedom that we used to exercise is rapidly going down the drain. Ever since September 2013, the Abbott Government has enforced their policy on Internet censorship and since then, it has become a government-regulated activity. Internet Censorship is too pervasive – it invades privacy, problems are created abroad – after all, the Internet was made to be freely accessible by all and it should continue to be like that.
Whilst the majority of countries in the world are not Internet censored, some countries such as UK, Norway, India, Australia and China have already
…show more content…
We think that by going to Incognito Mode on Chrome or to a Private Browsing Window on Safari, all our browsing history will not be recorded. That seems a bit hard to believe – what stays on the net stays on the net. You have already made a digital footprint and you cannot erase it. Therefore the government will have the liberty to see what we have searched when really, we do not want that. These days, the Internet has heightened censorship than in previous years due to exponential growth in globalisation, enabled by communications technology, global markets and transport technology. Indubitably, cyber is integrated within our economy and consequently, it affects the political landscape. The government must regulate Internet traffic, but not without invading our privacy. Somehow, they need to be conscious of both parties. They cannot abolish our basic right of privacy but at the same time, they need to keep us citizens safe by monitoring the political landscape. Privacy is something that we all hope to seek, but there would be no ways of achieving this if they do not balance these two …show more content…
Essentially, what a nation’s Internet censorship scheme protects may not necessarily be the same as what other countries would censor. One could define the Internet as a network comprising of many other networks that are connected globally. Hence, there are no whereabouts to determine the exact start and end points of the Internet – it is just not possible. Nations have different views on what should be censored, depending on many factors such as past history as well as the political and economical situation. Moreover, even if the government of a country censors risqué material in their country, there would still be other business from overseas who will import this material into the nation and hence, the Internet censorship scheme would be rendered as a failure.
Furthermore, a recent poll led by Debate.org showed that 73 per cent of people disagree with the idea of Internet censorship. Their arguments mainly addressed the issue of how Internet censorship does not just block out sexually explicit content, but it also blocks out controversial websites, such as euthanasia. As a result, the blockage hinders our freedom of speech because in the case of euthanasia, we should have the freedom to die mercifully, yet we do not have the option to do
Censorship in China has gained much attention recently because of the conflict between Google and the Chinese government’s self-censorship policies. In fact, censorship has been practiced since ancient China and the intensity only increases by the years. Nowadays, the most notable measure of censorship is being done on the Internet. More and more restrictions have been put into actions by the Chinese government, which make the life of Chinese Internet users, the Chinese netizens, very inconvenient. With the intensity of censorship increasing and the censoring technology improving, Internet censorship has mainly negative effects on Chinese society.
In a world of ever evolving technology, it has become increasingly difficult for many leaders to censor and control the flow of information. The development of the Internet throughout the nineties has created a cosmopolitan world in which people from across the earth can communicate and share ideas and information. The development of Internet technology and social media web platforms have led to an increased desire for democracy in many areas of the world; however, some nations have worked to curtail the freedom of information flow by developing complex Internet censorship programs. While Internet censorship is a highly relevant topic in today’s society, it is mainly viewed as a problem in non-democratic countries. While at there is merit to this viewpoint, censorship is a much more universal obstacle than most people realize.
For this project, I will be comparing and contrasting the online censorship practices of Canada and Iran. To think of the two countries simply; Canada has a free market for online communication while Iran has one full of restrictions. From my research, I have found that the Canadian government encourages the free flow of online communication and as a result has very little modes of censorship. For example, Canada aims “to provide quality and accessible communications services…a target to provide 100 percent of Canadian households with access to internet connectivity and broadband speeds of at least 5 Mbps by the end of 2016” (“Canada”). This only proves that Canada is focused on empowering their people’s rights with the ease and capability of browsing the internet.
The government has been monitoring and regulating an every day’s persons website history and what we buy and look at on the Internet. With the Internet growing rapidly and the amount of users on the Internet increasing, the easier it is for the government to find out peoples’ interests. Many people argue whether or not we should have vigorous rules and regulations when it comes to the Internet. One of the main concerns people have when it comes to their Internet is their privacy. There are many people who want to do harm using the tools that the Internet provides us with. The Internet should be regulated but not as harsh as some
The Internet has incurred a tremendous amount of growth and opportunity for the country as well as the world; elevating communication, information, and commerce to a new level. With all this unprecedented innovation, the Internet has also brought controversy that challenges the very foundation of rights that countries like the United States were founded on. With countless websites containing unregulated and objectively offensive content, and the public having an ease of access to this content will result in severe damages to the development of the youth if no censorship is put in place for them to view this content. Additionally, markets are being exploited by piracy which has resulted in billions of dollars being lost by the domestic economy
On the other hand, the US does not actively regulate the internet, relying on the public to regulate content on the internet, with little government intervention. The internet in the US is relatively open, whereas in China, information on the internet is suppressed based on what the Chinese government deems appropriate or inappropriate. Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State, has stated, “Countries that heavily censor the ‘Net are creating a new ‘Information Curtain’ to rival the old Iron Curtain of the Cold War era.”(Anderson)
These days the internet has become an essential part to living for almost everyone but one of the controversial topics that people bring up is that whether or not the government should regulate information on the internet. Both sides have valid points which form a reasonable argument. Some people would say that they need to because of the dangers lurking around in the cyber world but the reasons for why the government shouldn’t regulate the Internet outnumber the reasons for why they should. The federal government should not regulate or censor information on the internet because doing so violates the first amendment and citizen’s right to privacy, degrades the educational value of the web, prevents the promotion and facilitation of
My research project explored the extent of internet censorship and its necessity to China as a form of societal protection. It discussed the advantages, disadvantages and impacts of censorship on Chinese society. As I researched the topic, I determined that censoring parts of the internet was more than just about protecting the young Chinese children from online predators and distressing content. My initial intention was to highlight the wrongfulness of widespread censorship however, as I researched, I was able to understand that censoring parts of the internet improved the Chinese economy, prevented cybercrimes from occurring while concurrently offering online safety. I discovered this by analysing several different websites, YouTube videos and conducting two interviews with people with expertise in the Chinese internet. My outcome, presented in the form of a feature article, explained that censoring parts of the internet benefits society more than it harms.
The most common censorship method used by the Chinese government is IP blocking. This means that when a user requests certain IP addresses, access is immediately denied. A Harvard study, discovered that more than 18,000 sites are blocked; many of them top websites in the United States. A government sponsored news organization states that only “superstitious, pornographic, violence-related, gambling, and other harmful information” are blocked but critics have been quick to point out that many sites that do not fall into these categories are also blocked. Another Harvard study found that 13% of social media posts were blocked. These were posts by political activists that promoted or could conceivably incite collective action (such as riots or protests). Popular American social media sites like Twitter, Instagram and Facebook have been completely blocked, as have news organizations such as the New York Times. These websites have been recreated for the Chinese internet with censorship restrictions put into place.
Given all that I have read in preparing this paper, I have come to the conclusion that without a set of globally-accepted rules, we should not be censoring the Internet except where these rules are being broken. We could perhaps get agreement for those things that are obviously illegal and unethical (child pornography), but what about other areas such as gambling (is it legal but
With Social Media being still a relatively young form of media, governments and corporations are still attempting to find a way to bring regulations to the internet. Many times, this comes in the form of Internet Censorship. According to IPLocation, internet censorship is when a government institution or organization restricts what is seen on the internet. Wikipedia elaborates on this, stating that many times websites will self-censor. There are several reasons that this practice may take place: to uphold societal norms, to lessen hate speech, to protect from the exploitation of children, to promote a set of religious beliefs, etc. However, this obviously raises ethical questions regarding censorship, and while the government or corporate institutions may argue that these are bans with good intentions, there is no doubt that it can be a detriment as well.
The Internet was made to be freely used so that anyone could share their ideologies without any censorship. But throughout history, different types of societies have practiced censorship in one way or another. Censorship is any action taken by society to control access to ideas and information. The issue is increasingly important due to the rapid development of new communication technology; that is easily accessible. With the increase in technology many people are arguing over the controversial issue of Internet censorship whether it should or should not be allowed.
There are lots of countries that use internet censorship. A few of them are China, North Korea, and Russia. China is one of the leaders in using and censoring the internet. They have the biggest internet censorship system on the globe. Their system grew rapidly compared to most of the other countries censorship systems.
Internet censorship is developing far and wide and influences us, regardless that as United States citizens, we have additional technological opportunities than what many other nations do. Numerous Americans underestimate the opportunities that living in the United States permits us. Whether we are sending electronic mail, posting on our social media pages, or seeking out the latest news, we are ensured the opportunity of self-expression and an inexhaustible amount of information right at our fingertips. Censorship takes control of people's expression, and many countries, governments, and leaders support it for this reason. Internet Censorship in the United States in comparison to different nations brings to light the global and ethical issue regarding the basic human rights of education, communication, and freedom.
The Internet’s continuous advancement has produced the need for an on-going debate on whether or not the government should have the power to control the Internet. The idea of the government having control over what each country’s citizens can see on the Internet is also called Internet Censorship. Internet Censorship “is the control or suppression of the publishing of, or access to information on the Internet.” Internet Censorship varies from country to country depending on each country’s current usage and philosophy of how it should be used. (toptenreviews.com) Currently, there are ten countries including