NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES
INSTITUTIONS AS THE FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF LONG-RUN GROWTH Daron Acemoglu Simon Johnson James Robinson Working Paper 10481 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10481 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2004
Prepared for the Handbook of Economic Growth edited by Philippe Aghion and Steve Durlauf. We thank the editors for their patience and Leopoldo Fergusson, Pablo Querubín and Barry Weingast for their helpful suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2004 by Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two
…show more content…
More recent incarnations of growth theory, following Romer (1986) and Lucas (1988), endogenize steady-state growth and technical progress, but their explanation for income differences is similar to that of the older theories. For instance, in the model of Romer (1990), a country may be more prosperous than another if it allocates more resources to innovation, but what determines this is essentially preferences and properties of the technology for creating ‘ideas’.1 Though this theoretical tradition is still vibrant in economics and has provided many insights about the mechanics of economic growth, it has for a long time seemed unable to provide a fundamental explanation for economic growth. As North and Thomas (1973, p. 2) put it: “the factors we have listed (innovation, economies of scale, education, capital accumulation etc.) are not causes of growth; they are growth” (italics in original). Factor accumulation and innovation are only proximate causes of growth. In North and Thomas’s view, the fundamental explanation of comparative growth is differences in institutions. What are institutions exactly? North (1990, p. 3) offers the following definition: “Institutions are the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, are the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction.” He goes on to emphasize the key implications of institutions since, “In consequence they structure incentives in human exchange, whether political, social, or economic.” Of
Economic Development: Growth is associated with structural, social change and change in the important institutions of the economy.
In the novel, Why Nations Fail, the authors Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson attempt to provide an alternative explanation to the economic disparities seen in the modern world. The authors argue throughout the book that political and economic institutions are the most important cause for differences in economic performances across nations. Developed countries like the United States and Great Britain took important steps in their history to move towards inclusive institutions, while nations like the Congo and North Korea continue to maintain extractive institutions. In order to support their argument, the authors cite numerous examples throughout history that demonstrate how the adoption of inclusive institutions created a virtuous cycle in developed nations, resulting in long-term prosperity. Nations with extractive institutions, however remain in a vicious cycle that inhibit their ability to prosper economically. Acemoglu and Robinson make many compelling points throughout the novel to support their claims regarding the importance of institutions by properly explaining the difference between inclusive and extractive, their importance for sustained economic growth, and using Great Britain as an example to cite institutions historical importance. The authors, however could have strengthened their arguments by addressing the difficulties in implementing institutions that are not suitable for the economic and political environments of certain nations. and the potential for
insights which have been neglected by the later literature of new growth theory and new trade
In the The Grapes of Wraith men are more stubborn and rigid in their roles as "men". Due mostly to the time in which the story takes place the common social norm is that the man must support his family leaving the men to support themselves and others leaving less room for adaptability and flexibility. The situation that many families similar to the Joads found themselves in means that both men and women must be able to adapt to new, nontraditional roles. When the crops started dying and the dust bowls became common it was the mean to reacted the loss, while wives had little to no say or involvement in the farming. Though out the story we see some women, primarily Mama Joad, take on a more traditionally masculine roles forcing the men to take
An institution is a society or organization founded for a religious, educational, social or similar purpose, and it is an established law, practice, or custom. Douglass North and Barry Weingast, economists, believe that innovation which fueled the Industrial Revolution was due in part by institutional changes. Institutions are influential because they have the ability to effect transaction costs and rates of return on investments, which influences economic growth. Before the Industrial Revolution, British reforms of 1689 created an institutional foundation that allowed the state to matter in economic development. Their fiscal system created an institution in which they could prosper.
Economic growth, put simply, is “an increase in the amount of goods and services produced per head of the population over a period of time”; development is inextricably linked with this economic growth. By utilising theories of economic growth and development we can see how the Chinese and Sub-Saharan African economies have emerged, but, more notably, we can use these to look at patterns from past and present to show their experience and the implications of this growth for the future.
Established Stanford University professor, economist, and political scientist Barry Weingast portrays the global impact of institutions in his work through a term he coins the “fundamental political dilemma.” The dilemma illustrates that any government that has the power to protect property rights, enforce contracts, and maintain basic stability also has the power to take away the wealth of its citizens. A major question to consider, then, is what actually determines why some nations choose one route instead of the other? Weingast believes that the answer to this question lies in institutions; he states that institutions allow countries to choose the “rules of the game” and organize society. Simply put, the carefully-crafted institutions of
The definition of economic growth is the amalgamation of labor, capital and technological change. As people living in modern societies, one can see that they contribute to this growth with their everyday economic decisions such as investing, consuming and saving. Although one can clearly see the way this affects microeconomics, it brings into the question how one's everyday decisions affect the larger scale of macroeconomics. Robert Gordon, an economist wrote in one of his highly acclaimed papers about the long history of U.S. economic growth, furthermore linking periods of slow and rapid growth to three industrial revolutions: steam and railroads; electricity and the internal combustion engine; and the recent advent of computers, the internet and mobile phones. Although modern society have grown economically, he claims that if we continue to innovate as rapidly we are, the total economic growth may be substantially lower than the average growth between 1860 and 2007. Although technology economically helps people dramatically, it is still not enough to offset the overall pullback from rising income inequality, falling labor force participation rates, lack of widespread education and changing demographic structures. Thus leading to those who are single having to work 2 times harder to simply survive in current and future
This theory emphasizes that technology change has a major influence on economic growth, and that technological advances happen by chance. The theory argues that econonomic growth will not continue unless there continues to be advances in technology.
In the Acemeglu, Johnson and Robinson article, “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long Term Growth”, the authors emphasize how institutions are the main determinant of economic development because stronger institutions allow for more growth in education, security, and health. To observe whether strong institutions determine economic growth it is important to mention the characteristics of a strong institution that allows for fast growth. Strong institutions are able to enforce property rights, a fair judiciary, efficient bureaucracies, intellectual property rights, corporation government bankruptcy laws, and democracy (e.g. “(Lecture 13)”). Going in depth
Economic growth is shaped by policy context and promoted most effectively when it is consistent with either liberal market or co-ordinated market ideal type varieties of Capitalism. Policy inconsistency dampers economic growth
There are great differences and inequality between countries around the world. Many countries don’t have access to basic needs such as education, health care, law and order, safety why is that? Why is there a gap between rich and poor? How did some countries manage to become rich while others remained poor? These are the regularly asked questions about the development of countries. There are different perspectives on the growth of countries; however the three main theories mentioned in the book are due to geography, culture, ignorance or institutions. The authors of “Why nations fail “Acemoglu and Robhinson have challenged these theories . They believe that political institutions are the main factors for development of a well-functioning nation and the determinants of economic institutions. "It's all about institutions," Daron Acemoglu, one of the authors, explained. "It's really about human-made systems, rules, regulations, formal or informal that creates different incentives."
Through our discussion this past week, we pondered the role of institutions in investment and the subsequent resulting growth. I hypothesize that institutional quality, measured through economic freedom, influences three separate mechanisms that determine the level of investment and its efficiency in creating growth. First, institutional quality determines how markets allocate investment capital, favoring both less risky and higher returning projects. Countries with institutions more consistent with economic freedom have lower taxation rates and less chance of asset seizure, making them more attractive destinations for investment capital. Secondly, prospective investment capital is less likely to be used to pay bribes or be confiscated by the governments of more economically free countries. Thus, the capital is more likely to create growth rather than be allocated towards unproductive means. Lastly, countries with more economic freedom should observe higher rates of return due to increased worker productivity and lower regulatory costs, creating more economic growth and allowing for further investment. In sum, investment in more likely to be allocated to countries with better quality institutions, the investment capital is more likely to be used towards productive projects in those countries, and finally, the investment capital should produce higher returns, leading to more economic growth. This is particularly relevant in the
February 10, 2009 The purpose of this note is to define the meaning of the term ‘inclusive’ growth. It is often used interchangeably with a suite of other terms, including ‘broad-based growth’, ‘shared growth’, and ‘pro-poor growth’. The paper clarifies the distinctions between these terms as well as highlights similarities.
My views concerning the growth of firms have changed after completing AP Macroeconomics. Previously, I did not recognize that there are differences between short-term and long-term benefits. I believed that there were many ways for a