The documentary, “The Lottery” by Madeleine Sackler, is about a neighborhood in New York City called Harlem. Harlem is populated by a majority of low-income African-American residents. The documentary tries to inform us about how hard it is to get good education in a poor community like this one and how crucial it is for low-income parents to make it happen through a lottery in the Harlem Success Academy Charter School. Is this documentary an effective argument? An effective argument should be informative, persuasive, should have strong appeal, and strong evidence. Yes, I believe that this documentary is an effective argument because it has all the qualities required for an effective argument. To be informative means to impart knowledge or to educate (Merriam Webster Dictionary). This documentary is informative because it states the issues clearly and gives us good background information about the community and the oppositions against charter schools, specifically the Harlem Success Academy. Teachers’ Union thinks that charter schools are a threat to public schools because they are stealing their students and are splitting up their community into two. Also, the only way for students to enter into the …show more content…
Logical appeals should have credible expert interviews, statistics, observations, and acknowledgment of the opposition (University Writing Center). The Lottery is credible by interviewing experts as in the president/CEO of Harlem Children’s Zone- Geoffrey Canada, the Mayor of Newark- Cory Brooker, and the Founder/CEO of Success Academy of Charter Schools- Eva Moskowitz. The statistics show that 58% of fourth graders are functionally illiterate and that black 12th graders are equivalent to white 8th graders (Sackler, 2010). It shows the observations of both sides of the story (the Harlem Success vs the teachers’ union) and the struggle of the parents preparing their children at home for the lottery
I found the video and its materials to be very fascinating and ground-breaking. Teacher Jane Elliott thought of and carried out an exercise that left a permanent imprint on the mindset of the third graders. Her two-day experiment had the purpose of outlining a wide spectrum of challenges faced by folks of color in our country every day. She accomplished her lesson by asking the students whether they knew what it was like to live in a discriminatory society for someone who wasn't a part of the white supremacy. Little did they know how difficult and unjust their life would be with only one change - skin color.
Did you know that Shirley Jackson wrote “The Lottery” in less than two hours? That is incredible considering her story was so suspenseful and detailed. Shirley Jackson is the master of suspense because she used surprising symbolism and fantastic foreshadowing in “The Lottery.” She followed those writing techniques up with a creative cliffhanger to create a story that kept the reader on the edge of their seat.
While many corruptions in the world are fought against, people, such as Tessie Hutchinson, decide to make the issue unimportant unless it openly involves them. In “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, citizens of the town pay no mind to the issue at hand, rather than noticing the actual problem. Tessie Hutchinson’s extreme shift in emotion and behavior ties straight from the theme when her family is the so-called lucky family in the lottery.
Nebeker, Helen E. “The Lottery’: Symbolic Touch De Force” Short Story Criticism, edited by Jenny Cromie, vol. 39, Gale Group, 2000, 75 vols, pp. 187-90. Originally published in American Literature, vol. 46, no. 1, March, 1974, pp. 100-07.
In both stories, the innocent characters were fighting death at the hands of someone who found the idea of killing another human being to be a game. In “The Lottery” the game of death consumed an innocent life solely because a few individuals founded a tradition; and in “The Most Dangerous Game” the game of death consumed an innocent life solely because one person thought it was merely entertaining. Both authors portrayed the antagonist as friendly, warm and welcoming. In the Lottery, the antagonists were the families whom participated in the drawing of a name that lead to the stoning of another family member (which may or may not be their own family member). In “The Most Dangerous Game” the antagonist was a well-off general who opened his luxurious home to guests who have gone astray from their original destination. Death is the main theme of both short stories and both authors portrayed this dark and dreary idea as a game the characters are playing.
Over the years many critics have wrote articles on Shirley Jackson's numerous works. Many critics had much to say about Jackson's most famous short story, "The Lottery". Her insights and observations about man and society are disturbing; and in the case of "The Lottery," they are shocking. "The themes themselves are not new, evil cloaked in seeming good, prejudice and hypocrisy, loneliness and frustration, psychological studies of minds that have slipped the bonds of reality" (Friedman). Literary critic, Elizabeth Janeway wrote that, " 'The Lottery' makes its effect without having to state a moral about humanity's need to deflect the knowledge of its own death on a victim. That uneasy consciousness is
When “The Lottery” was first published in 1948, it created an enormous controversy and great interest in its author, Shirley Jackson.
In “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and the historical event of blacklisting Americans during the 1950s, the authors convey that loyalty causes us to turn against others around you through symbols. In “The Lottery”, loyalty to tradition caused a society to turn on one another. “The Lottery” was an annual tradition where each head of household (the dominant male in each home) picked a slip of paper. If the piece selected had a black dot on it, you had to go through the selection process again, but this time each individual member of your family had to choose a slip out of the box. Whoever chose the black dot out of there family had won the Lottery, and would be sacrificed for a good corn season. On the seventy-seventh lottery, the
Believing in a passion can be persuasive to others. If one has a passion for something, there is an uncontrollable emotion about it. Everyone in the world is different, if it was not that way, the world would not go around. Someone may have a passion for something that another person can not stand. In “The Lottery,” there was a negative passion for people getting stoned. The emotions of others that did not get stoned were horrific for the one getting stoned to death. The father in “Without Title,” had a huge passion for hunting buffalo. The only problem was that his wife did not let him, she made him work in the city while he would have worked otherwise in the woods. In “Texas vs. Johnson,” as a whole community and around the world, there
Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” is a story littered with warnings and subtext about the dangers a submissive society can pose. While the opening is deceptively cheery and light Jackson uses an array of symbols and ominous syntax to help create the apprehensive and grim tone the story ends with. Her portrayal of the town folk as blindly following tradition represents the world during World War II when people’s failure to not mindlessly accept and heed authority lead to disastrous consequences. . Shirley Jackson uses a large array of techniques to help convey the idea that recklessly following and accepting traditions and orders can lead to disastrous consequences.
During 1948, the United States used the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; it was devastating and killed many people. The Lottery by Shirley Jackson tells a story about how cruel people can be without feeling any remorse. The story is about a small town who has a yearly lottery and the winner gets stoned to death by their neighbors. The thought is that if you have a lottery, then you will have good crops that season. Written in 1948, the story tells the tale of poor Tessie Hutchinson, who is stoned by her own town for winning the lottery. In the short story The Lottery, Shirley Jackson argues that all people, regardless of how civilized they may seem, are capable of great evil by contrasting seemingly pleasant and relatable details of the town with the shocking barbarity of their tradition.
“The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson was written in 1948. The story takes place in a village square of a town on June 27th. The author does not use much emotion in the writing to show how the barbaric act that is going on is look at as normal. This story is about a town that has a lottery once a year to choose who should be sacrificed, so that the town will have a plentiful year for growing crops. Jackson has many messages about human nature in this short story. The most important message she conveys is how cruel and violent people can be to one another. Another very significant message she conveys is how custom and tradition can hold great power over people. Jackson also conveys the message of
The idea of winning a lottery is associated with luck, happiness and anticipation of good things. In Shirley Jackson's story, " The Lottery", this is not the case. The irony of the story is that the winner of the lottery gets stoned to death by everyone else in the town. The story is very effective because it examines certain aspects of human nature.
In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, the small village, at first, seems to be lovely, full of tradition, with the townspeople fulfilling their civic duties, but instead this story is bursting with contrast. The expectations that the reader has are increasingly altered. The title of this short story raises hope, for in our society the term “lottery” typically is associated with winning money or other perceived “good” things. Most people associate winning a lottery with luck, yet Jackson twists this notion around and the luck in this village is with each of the losers.
In the short story "The Lottery," author Shirley Jackson creates a very shocking and horrifying situation through the use of characterization, setting, and the theme of the individual versus society, which is portrayed in the story as scapegoating. She writes as if the events taking place are common to any town (Mazzeno 2). The story was very unpopular when first published, mostly because of the fact that people did not understand it. The story of the all-to-familiar town, ordinary in every way except for the ritualistic murder taking place has since grown great popularity, even being adapted for television, ballet, and radio (Lethem 1-2).