Informative Essay: Does Protesting Really Work

When Society does not agree with a new policy that the Government put into place, it normally results in protests near Governmental Buildings with signs criticising the work of Government. However, protests are both

Protesting is extremely un-American. After all, this country was founded by people smiling and accepting their circumstances silently and hoping for the best. Said absolutely nobody ever. The basis of the American democracy is freedom of expression. From the Boston Tea Party and boycotts against the Quartering Act to the 2017 March for Science, the history of our nation is dotted with instances of peaceful resistance and protest that are, for the most part, viewed in an extremely favorable light.

Peaceful protests, that is a protest without violence, are a way to try and persuade those in power to enact or not enact a certain law. This is known as acts of civil disobedience. A typical example of this are rallies or protests against something, where people gather peacefully for or against the same thing. People engaging in civil disobedience could also engage in vows of silence, marching, fasting, and many other peaceful ways to stand up against the inequalities or injustices that they are experiencing. The reason that this is done and is important is because the other option is to violently protest or cause more problems. This is not a good way to go about it because even if it comes from a justified place of hurt or anger, it could result in more harm and arrests than are already happening. Even if theses protests or marches get intense, fights breaking out can happen but the goal is always to be nonviolent. The reasons that civil disobedience is seen in such a negative light is because many people equate it to the violent examples. They view it as the people who are violently protesting, getting pepper sprayed and arrested by cops. Even that isn’t a justified opinion because those people getting paper sprayed and arrested often times are

You have those people who want their voices heard in a positive way. You always have to cause destruction and chaos when you feel strong about something; because you think it will help. You can partake in your freedom of speech and peacefully protest. If you do this you do not have to worry about much because it’s your constitutional right to do so. Peaceful protesting in many cases can solve more problems than violence can. It is a simple and easy way to release your frustration in a calm peaceful manner.

Protesting has existed for decades as an option to get your voice heard. The problem is it cannot always be justify because of the occasional

When I think of protesting, I think of activists who want to make and see a change being made on a specific social issue. In regards to the “right” way to protest, I believe that less is more and simply getting together in a civilized matter is much more effective than causing chaos in the streets. Everybody handles things differently and some might find that being lawful is not the way to protest but in my point of view, I believe that risking you life or breaking the law is definitely not the way to get your voice heard clearly.

It is said that there is strength in numbers. This statement shows a lot of truth, as it has been probed time and time again throughout history that more can be accomplished together rather than separately. One way that people can work together to make a difference is through protesting.

Some people think that violent protest are the only way to promote change. They say nonviolent means of protesting does not gain enough media attention to

Languages are a major part of a cultural identity. Different cultures speak different ways. The Igbo people spoke differently than the missionaries. In the bible, at the tower of Babel everything got mixed up at some point. The languages that are spoken today can slowly fade away. Their culture is how they live their life. These texts that were examined had many different ways people lived their lives.

I feel that at this point in the presidential election process, the argument for Hillary Clinton is pretty simple and can be summed up as “the stakes are simply just too high.” However, I understand that many people feel differently about this issue. Throughout the primary election process, I know a lot of people have felt as though they must choose between the lesser of two evils. This sentiment has caused some to vote for a third party, and some to abstain from choosing a presidential candidate entirely. While I understand that this election has been trying, and that these feelings of disappointment are very real for several Americans, I hold the belief that the stakes are simply just too high to abstain from the vote. In this paper, I will attempt to demonstrate just how qualified Hillary Clinton is to be the President of the United States of America. She has 30 years of experience in government, and supports positions on issues that I feel all Americans should care about. These issues include children’s access to health care, education, and her economic plan. Foreign affairs are also increasingly important, and income inequality has been an issue for years. I hope to weigh the issues Hillary Clinton plans to take on if she is elected president against Donald Trump as a candidate. The two have vastly different experiences and qualifications, but as we have all likely noticed, they also have vastly different characters. I hope I can make a case for why you should vote for

In a dictionary the word ‘protest’ is explained as “an expression or declaration of objection, disapproval, or dissent, often in opposition to something a person is powerless to prevent or avoid” (dictionary.com, n.d.). As definitions have to be written in a formal style and to make sure they are often is used mitigation. In this case words (like ‘expression of disapproval’) also seem to imply that protest is a harmless action. In the reality though if talking about protest the most common associations would be about mass demonstrations, pickets, strikes or even blood and violence and no wonder as in most of the cases it really involves all of those things. As an example it is worth to mention recent riots taking place in London and

There are many different types and ways of protesting. For example, there are sit-ins, where you remain in one spot

One the flip side, however, some may argue that any form of civil disobedience can breed disrespect and an anarchical society. Also, there could be consequences to protesting high powers. Some people are physically harmed, threatened and even arrested for expressing their beliefs on political, economical or social issues. People who peacefully resist could also be seen as "traitors" to the general public. Another con to peaceful resistance is that often times, the results you are looking for aren't given as fast as they would going to the courts. It's about making sure your intended audience hears your

What is a protest and what is it good for? The definition of a protest is a complaint or objection against an idea, an act, or a way of doing things; an event in which people gather to show disapproval of something.

Not only protesters, but also civil people living in the country experience the condition of fear and fright in their lives when they hear that the authorities use violent force to end protests. After the manner of case in Cambodia, the authorities use wooden sticks, electric bars, tear guns, bullet guns, and even a fire truck to put a stop to the group of protesters. This operation is very aggressive, which people feel scared to gather for another time, and people cannot find any chance to express their ideas to the public for positive criticism on any problems they have found. More than that, not all the decisions made by the government are prefect and suited to all the people and every part of the country, and the government needs the majority of citizens to express their ideas on a certain problem. Therefore, if there is a huddle for citizens to come up with their ideas in the public, the country will face the lesson of worsening the