Information Of The Invasion Of Privacy

Therefore this key will used for further more mode of communication in between both of them.

In the Code Book, by Simon Singh he talks about how the exchange of digital information over the internet has become the most used way to send messages and mail. The use of cryptography is being used to encrypt emails or important messages. Paper mail has slowly decreased because of everyone using the internet to do everything and making it easier for someone to intercept an important message . However, when sending the information or message thru paper mail it is more difficult for someone to intercept the message, but if using the internet if you don't send it encrypted it can be easy for the message to be read by someone else.

On June 6, 2013, The Guardian published a story about the National Security Agency's (NSA) secret Internet surveillance program, PRISM (Greenwald and MacAskill 2013). The story was based on documents leaked by one of the most successful whistle-blowers in American history, former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. The documents that Snowden has released up to this time have shown the NSA to be heavily engaged in the collection of personal Internet activity, bulk collection of telephone "metadata," and other forms of surveillance that have brought U.S. intelligence practices into question.

The National Security Agency over the past few years was revealed to have spied on American citizens under what can be considered illegal or unconstitutional circumstances which sparked concern and outrage across most of America. This was first recognized in 2013 when the whistleblower Edward Snowden or traitor as the United States government considers him, leaked

Surveillance and Intelligence skyrocketed due to the terrorist attack. This is a controversial topic because the intelligence agencies can break the 4th amendment or the right to privacy and spy on innocent Americans. The 4th amendment was broken by the NSA and was exposed on June of 2013, leaked NSA agent Edward Snowden. The leaked documents showed how the NSA was collecting phone records of millions of Americans and collected data on who has communicated with whom over the internet (bbc.com) making what the NSA was doing unconstitutional.

On September 11, 2001, acts of terror inflicted upon the United States influenced the federal government to take action and draft legislation to combat new terrorist threats (Patriot Act). Unfortunately, the federal government used this opportunity to turn the new grandiloquence legislation, known as the Patriot Act, against the common interest of the American people. The Patriot Act allowed government agencies, such as the NSA, to monitor the actions and conversations of personal communications (Snowden). Furthermore, the act allowed the massive amounts of information to be stored in the NSA database, and some of that information collected passed around washington. When the American public realized the foul the government was committing, they became very upset with the federal government, and the emotions caused a tension between the American people and the federal government. Although, when the patriot act was first written, stated that its purpose was to combat terrorism.

The American people, including many big corporations such as Apple, disagree with the government collecting the personal information of the American people. President, Barack Obama, stated that intelligence committees and all congress members were briefed on the Patriot Act and its contents (Obama). The congressmen knew what the Patriot Act did involving the personal commutations in the United States. Nevertheless, the Patriot act was voted into being a law almost unanimously in the senate, 98-1, and 357-66 in the House of Representatives (Patriot Act). When Ed Snowden leaked that the NSA was obtaining personal information and how it was handled, the American people became shocked and outraged towards the government, and created a tension from the American people towards the government.

Ever since the American public was made aware of the United States government’s surveillance policies, it has been a hotly debated issue across the nation. In 2013, it was revealed that the NSA had, for some time, been collecting data on American citizens, in terms of everything from their Internet history to their phone records. When the story broke, it was a huge talking point, not only across the country, but also throughout the world. The man who introduced Americans to this idea was Edward Snowden.

No embarrassment needed. Oddly enough it is one thing to share the screen with a vendor through the encrypted web meeting, the issue becomes sending through email in an unencrypted fashion. The simple truth is that email travels through the public Internet, think Central Expressway, in plain text.

For the reasons stated in Part I, supra, when the invasion of privacy torts were created, its promulgators went to great lengths to distinguish the interest protected by those causes of action as opposed to traditional causes of action for defamation and the like. Nevertheless, those distinctions have faded throughout the years, and in Maryland, “[a]n allegation of false light must meet the same legal standards as an allegation of defamation.” Piscatelli v. Van Smith, 424 Md. 294, 306 (2012). Accordingly, for the reasons stated in my prior memoranda, if it is determined that the plaintiff does not state a cause of action for defamation, so too must the false light claim fail. Stated differently, defamation is a necessary condition in order to achieve false light. See Id. (“We shall address in greatest detail [the plaintiff] 's defamation claim, but need not address the false light claim separately.”). Accordingly, all that follows assumes first that the plaintiff has made a claim for defamation.

The NSA has been using counterterrorism tactics to protect the United States from terrorism for a while. However, these methods utilized by the NSA has invaded the privacy of citizens without their consent. The movie “Enemy of State” focuses on the different ways that the NSA is invading our privacy. The NSA invades the privacy of citizens through communication methods such as email, phone, fax and many others. Many of the services that we use today such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo has aided government surveillance.

As citizens of America we are all entitled to our rights of privacy. When something threatens this guaranteed privacy we tend to take extra precautions to prohibit prolonged violation. As the advancing world of technology continues to grow and expand, so do the amount of cases involving privacy invasion. Technology drives these privacy-invading crimes; however, crime also drives technology, creating a vicious cycle. Without technology an invader could not enter that of a stranger’s life. Conversely, without technology that same criminal would evade the law enforcers. So does technology protect citizens’ privacy, or does it expose one’s entire life? In regards to this question, one must

We have all experienced it. The tingles down your spine while your sixth sense picks up someone’s harsh eyes scanning you. You are being watched. As the little hairs stand up on your neck and the chill of judgment floods your body, you choke on the insecurity that comes over you. Some break out in a nervous sweat and drown themselves in doubt; others do not hesitate to send beams of criticism back. Many stare with innocent intentions while others purposely hope to provoke anxiety. However, if you did not know that someone’s cruel eyes were on you, would it be just as bothersome? Since 2000, internet security has been an issue that many feel is a violation of their privacy. This controversial topic has hit almost all newspapers with

Two parties each create a public-key, private-key pair and communicate the public key to the other party. The keys are designed in such a way that both sides can calculate the same unique secret key based on each side's private key and the other side's public key.

Off The Record Messaging being a cryptographic protocol is the most commonly used and famous components of web systems. It works in the way like when two people chat with each other, new encryption keys are created and destroyed. The trend of instant messaging has developed since 1995. There is a great property of OTR i.e. ‘plausible deniability’ which states that after the chat among any two people is ended, a certain key (HMAC) is made public, which makes it impossible to prove that the messages were not gorged by someone else. Off the record messaging makes our conversations confidential. There are two separate conventions for informing secure content. First, it builds up a safe session on top of the short message service using a common mystery. The second one is utilized to build up that mutual mystery. OTR provides security by the following:-