People move to places where they know is strong and independent, with strong and leading rulers. In 1806, Thomas Jefferson wanted to expand west to have more land and more people move there and start farming and making new products, etc… when Thomas Jefferson wanted a land, but some people were living there, so he said that Americans would move there, and as for the original residents, they will be independent, and uncivilized (Document 2). Later in 1829, Indian Removal Act happened, Andrew Jackson wanted the land so he offered to the Indians who lived there at the time, to take their land, and give them another piece of land where they can all move and live there, because he wanted to take the more fertile and better land (Documents 5). This
I disagree with the Indian Removal Act. One reason is while the Native Americans were being removed, they traveled on a path called the Trail of Tears, where many Native Americans died. Also, the Indian Removal Act took away most of the freedoms the Native Americans had. This is why I disagree with the Indian Removal Act.
What would you do if someone came to your home unexpectedly, and told you that you had to move whether you want to or not? That was the case for some Native Americans during the time of the Indian Removal Act. This act basically says that the Native Americans would be granted land, in exchange for their home territory, but many Native Americans disagreed with this act. The Indian Removal act that took place in 1830 was not justified, because the Cherokee tribe had to move even though the majority of them haven’t agreed to move, the Cherokee tribe helped the United States during the war of 1812, and the Americans treated the Native Americans unfair.
Politics, race, and medicine were all important factors during the Indian Removal of 1830, as they had convinced the people of the United States that removing the Natives from their land was the right step for the nation. Presidents Jefferson and Jackson main goals were to either force the Natives to migrate further away or to force them to assimilate to western culture.
The removal of the Creek Indians in the Indian Removal Act helped the development of the United States but in a cruel and harsh way. Without the Indian Removal Act, most of the land that is America today would be inhabited by indians. Although we were mostly at peace with the Creeks and had trading and housing arrangements, after the Indian Removal act was created, it all went downhill. There were wars, conflicts, and bribes for land and that just made the Creeks fall apart .
There were a variety of key factors that have led to the removal of the Cherokee Indians. One of the key factors that had promoted the removal of the Indians was the belief system of Manifest Destiney. The young colonists believed it was their mission from God to use the land given to them to the fullest. The colonists also believe they are to spread Democracy. This belief system caused the Cherokee Indians to lose most their land. The settlers annexed Florida from the Spanish not only because of their neglect, but they wanted to defeat the Native Americans. They wanted the large farmland they had in Florida. The Black Hawk War in the North caused the removal of many Sauk Indians to Kansas from Wisconsin and Minnesota. Regardless if the land was purchased Indians, the Americans believed they were entitled to all the land on the continent. They lost land through battle, treaties, and were forced to hand over land if they wanted the colonists support. A key factor of the Indian removal was the adoption of European culture. As many assimilated to the European culture, they were faced with prejudice
The Trail of exiles was a trail of death. The Indian Removal Act was a controversial idea which many people spoke out against. Many protested over the poor treatment of the Native Americans. On the other hand, settlers supporting the Indian Removal Act stated that this will be an advantage to America gaining more land and wealth.
If you were a Cherokee, would you want to give up everything you know to a total stranger? No because of the different grudges that would be held against them, how they were treated, and the Americans don’t and shouldn’t have the right to kick them of land that wasn’t theirs. In the past before this act the indians had helped the Americans achieve and conquer different things. Such as the Louisiana Purchase the indians had been there during the act for guidance and somewhat wisdom of what’ll be in there journey. The indian removal act wasn’t justified because the Cherokee had arrived before the georgians had, Americans were disrespectful towards the Cherokee, and had fought with/for the Americans during different wars but were still treated harshly.
When migrating there are many factors that attract different groups of people to move into different parts of land. The surplus of land made moving to Georgia or the Carolinas as well as Chesapeake and the middle colonies a desire for most people. No one lived in these really and it was under the radar. Moving there would help people get land and use it before someone else took it.
In the early 1800s, Americans and immigrants moved to the west for various reasons. These reasons includes rumors of gold and silver,the transcontinental railroad, and the Homestead Act. A tremendous reason is push-pull factors. Soon after moving to the west, settlers soon figure out moving was a not so good decision. In the west, there were prairie fires and unfarmable land. Disputes rang out between Plain Indians and settlers that were violent. Federal agents to make agreements/treaties that were considered misunderstanding and fraud. Native Americans forced onto reservations. The natural world of the American of the West was destroyed by new coming settlers. There were many hardships and motivations for moving West.
Under the patriarchal system, the European authorities continued to colonize the relationships between the Aboriginal women and members of the community. When the European colonizers passed the Indian Act in 1876, they decided to take full control of the power away from the Aboriginal people. According to Section 3 of the Indian Act, it stated that “[t]he term ‘Indian’ means “any male person of Indian blood reputed to belong to a particular brand,” “any child of such person,” “any women who is or was lawfully married to such person.” The Indian Act gave inclusive rights only to Aboriginal men to keep their Indian status, while women were in danger of losing their status and power. The act discriminated against women because "the Act specified
The Indian Removal Act was passed in congress on May 28, 1830, it was passed by only one vote in congress. The act was then signed by the president at that time Andrew Jackson. The Indian Removal Act gave Andrew Jackson the ability to negotiate with the Indian tribes for their removal from the southern United States to move to an area west of the Mississippi river. The Indian Removal Act was passed because of American settlers wanting to take Indians land, the discovery of gold in Cherokee territory, and the desire for moe land by the United States Government that believed the Indians land could be used to boost the economy. This act resulted in the removal of 5 major Indian tribes; the tribes affected were Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek,
The year is 1830. You are out in your farm, gathering food for your dinner. Suddenly, Cherokee Indians burst out of the nearby woods and drag you away by your hair. At their camp, they tied you to a wood pole and build a fire around your feet. The last sensation you feel is sweltering heat as a wave of black consumes you. This is a small taste of what it was like back in 1830. Before the United States was as large as it is now, the U.S. kept bumping elbows with its neighbors, the Indians. President Andrew Jackson introduced the Indian Removal Act to give the U.S. some room. The Creeks and Choctaw Indians already moved out, and only the Cherokee Indians remained. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 and withdrawal of the Cherokee was justified because they were bloodthirsty, the U.S. needed room to grow, and it’s not the worst thing in the world for them.
During the ninetieth century the United States began a policy to remove Indians in the lands east of the Mississippi. Under the Indian Removal Act of 1830 Indians were forced to give up their lands east of the Mississippi and forced to move west of the Mississippi. Indian removal did not actually begin there. Prior to the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the United States used treaties and other means to remove Indians from lands that white settlers wanted or moved into. Aside from treaties the United States waged wars on Indians that refused to leave their lands peacefully.
The early 1800’s was a very important time for America. The small country was quickly expanding. With the Louisiana Purchase and the Lewis and Clark expedition, America almost tripled in size by 1853. However, even with the amount of land growing, not everyone was welcomed with open arms. With the expansion of the country, the white Americans decided that they needed the Natives out.
One of the defining moments of President Andrew Jackson’s career, if not the most significant, was the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This was a controversial bill at the time and the impact from it is still felt today. The Indian Removal Act directly led to the displacement of thousands of Native Americans; including four thousand deaths during the Trail of Tears, the forced march from Georgia to Oklahoma. While overt racism played a clear role in relocating Native Americans past the Mississippi, it is possible that other factors were at play. The living conditions in many of the states were poor for Natives and Jackson hoped that giving them a new location to live could remedy these problems while opening the land up for white settlers.